Abstract
We determine size, shape and location for a territory that is optimal in the sense of minimizing defense costs, when a given proportion of the boundary is landmarked and its primary benefit in terms of fitness is greater ease of detecting intruders across it. Increasing the landmarked proportion of boundary causes the optimal configuration to be smaller and more elongated, and to be located with its center further from the nest, so that the nest is closer to the landmarked boundary. These predictions accord with observations in a recent study of the convict cichlid Amatitlania siquia. Our results thus confirm the consistency of the observed behavior with the hypothesis that A. siquia designs its territory to make intruders easier to spot. Our results also lead us to conjecture that moving the landmark proportionately closer to or further away from the nest would have yielded essentially the same outcome in this study, because the optimal configuration depends only on the angle subtended by the landmark at the nest and hence only on the length of the landmark relative to its distance from the nest, as opposed to its absolute value.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1978) Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. Theor Popul Biol 13:397–409
Baylis JR (1974) The behavior and ecology of Herotilapia multispinosa (Teleostei, Cichlidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 34:115–146
Bazaraa MS, Sherali HD, Shetty CM (2006) Nonlinear programming: theory and algorithms, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Eason PK (1998) Territorial defense. In: Greenberg G, Haraway MM (eds) Comparative psychology: a handbook. Garland Publishing Inc, New York, pp 771–776
Eason PK, Stamps JA (1992) The effect of visibility on territory size and shape. Behav Ecol 3(2):166–172
Eason PK, Cobbs GA, Trinca KG (1999) The use of landmarks to define territorial boundaries. Anim Behav 58:85–91
Ford RG (1983) Home range in a patchy environment: optimal foraging predictions. Am Zool 23:315–326
Hancock H (1917) Elliptic integrals. Wiley, New York
Hazlett B (1978) Individual distance in crustacea II. The mantis shrimp Gonodactylus oerstedii. Mar Behav Physiol 5:243–254
Heap SM, Byrne P, Stuart-Fox D (2012) The adoption of landmarks for territorial boundaries. Anim Behav 83:871–878
Kodric-Brown A (1978) Establishment and defence of breeding territories in a pupfish (Cyprinodontidea: Cyprinodon). Anim Behav 26:818–834
Krebs JR (1982) Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): Do residents always win? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:185–194
Kruuk H (1978) Spatial organization and territorial behaviour of the European badger Meles meles. J Zool 184:1–19
LaManna JR, Eason PK (2003) Effects of landmarks on territorial establishment. Anim Behav 65:471–478
Lojewski JA, Switzer PV (2015) The role of landmarks in territory maintenance by the black saddlebags dragonfly, Tramea lacerata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:347–355
Macdonald DW (1979) The flexible social system of the golden jackal, Canis aureus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:17–38
Mesterton-Gibbons M, Adams ES (2003) Landmarks in territory partitioning: a strategically stable convention? Am Nat 161:685–697
Miller RJ (1964) Studies on the social behavior of blue gourami, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pisces, Belontiidae). Copeia 1964:469–496
Nursall JR (1977) Territoriality in redlip blennies (Ophioblennius atlanticus-Pisces: Blenniidae). J Zool 182:205–223
Reid ML, Weatherhead PJ (1988) Topographical constraints on competition for territories. Oikos 51:115–117
Smith C (2011) Good fences make good neighbours: the role of landmarks in territory partitioning in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Behaviour 148:233–246
Suriyampola PS (2013) Territoriality and landscape of aggression, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Louisville
Suriyampola PS, Eason PK (2014) A field study investigating effects of landmarks on territory size and shape. Biol Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0009
Suriyampola PS, Eason PK (2015) The effects of landmarks on territorial behavior in a convict cichlid, Amatitlania siquia. Ethology 121:785–792
Tupper M, Boutilier RG (1995) Size and priority at settlement determine growth and competitive success of newly settled Atlantic cod. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 118:295–300
Watson A, Miller GR (1971) Territory size and aggression in a fluctuating red grouse population. J Anim Ecol 40:367–383
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by a grant from the Simons Foundation (#274041 to Mike Mesterton-Gibbons) and a COFRS award from Florida State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mesterton-Gibbons, M., Dai, Y. An Effect of Landmarks on Territory Shape in a Convict Cichlid. Bull Math Biol 77, 2366–2378 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0130-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-015-0130-4