Skip to main content
Log in

Resource Consumption, Sustainability, and Cancer

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preserving a system’s viability in the presence of diversity erosion is critical if the goal is to sustainably support biodiversity. Reduction in population heterogeneity, whether inter- or intraspecies, may increase population fragility, either decreasing its ability to adapt effectively to environmental changes or facilitating the survival and success of ordinarily rare phenotypes. The latter may result in over-representation of individuals who may participate in resource utilization patterns that can lead to over-exploitation, exhaustion, and, ultimately, collapse of both the resource and the population that depends on it. Here, we aim to identify regimes that can signal whether a consumer–resource system is capable of supporting viable degrees of heterogeneity. The framework used here is an expansion of a previously introduced consumer–resource type system of a population of individuals classified by their resource consumption. Application of the Reduction Theorem to the system enables us to evaluate the health of the system through tracking both the mean value of the parameter of resource (over)consumption, and the population variance, as both change over time. The article concludes with a discussion that highlights applicability of the proposed system to investigation of systems that are affected by particularly devastating overly adapted populations, namely cancerous cells. Potential intervention approaches for system management are discussed in the context of cancer therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brauer F, Castillo-Chavez C (2012) Mathematical models in population biology and epidemiology. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brauer F, Castillo-Chavez C (2013) Mathematical models for communicable diseases. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell RA, McGranahan N, Bartek J, Swanton C (2013) The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Nature 501(7467):338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Chavez C (2013) The control, dynamics and evolution of emergent and re-emergent diseases in the context of sustainability. http://www.mathaware.org/mam/2013/essays/

  • Castillo-Chavez C, Levin SA, Gould F (1988) Physiological and behavioral adaptation to varying environments: a mathematical model. Evolution 42(5):986–994

  • Chow K, Wang X, Curtiss R III, Castillo-Chavez C (2011) Evaluating the efficacy of antimicrobial cycling programmes and patient isolation on dual resistance in hospitals. J Biol Dyn 5(1):27–43

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, New York

  • Darwin C (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. J. Murray

  • Davies J, Davies D (2010) Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74(3):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T (2009) Q’s next: the diverse functions of glutamine in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene 29(3):313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denholm I, Rowland MW (1992) Tactics for managing pesticide resistance in arthropods: theory and practice. Annu Rev Entomol 37(1):91–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer G, Levin SA, Buttel L (1990) A simulation model of the population dynamics and evolution of myxomatosis. Ecol Monogr 60:423–447

  • Elser JJ, Kyle MM, Smith MS, Nagy JD (2007) Biological stoichiometry in human cancer. PloS One 2(10):e1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenichel EP, Castillo-Chavez C, Ceddia MG, Chowell G, Parra PAG, Hickling GJ, Holloway G, Horan R, Morin B, Perrings C et al (2011) Adaptive human behavior in epidemiological models. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(15):6306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1999) The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Gatenby RA, Silva Ariosto S (2009) Adaptive therapy. Cancer Res 69(11):4894–4903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies RJ, Robey I, Gatenby RA (2008) Causes and consequences of increased glucose metabolism of cancers. J Nucl Med 49(Suppl 2):24S–42S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point: how little things can make a big diflerence. Little, Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorban AN, Smirnova EV, Tyukina TA (2010) Correlations, risk and crisis: from physiology to finance. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 389(16):3193–3217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahnfeldt P, Folkman J, Hlatky L (2003) Minimizing long-term tumor burden: the logic for metronomic chemotherapeutic dosing and its antiangiogenic basis. J Theor Biol 220(4):545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebeler DE, Morin BR (2007) The effect of static and dynamic spatially structured disturbances on a locally dispersing population. J Theor Biol 246(1):136–144

  • Hooper DU, Chapin Iii FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S et al (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75(1):3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen Marco A, Anderies John M (2007) Robustness trade-offs in social-ecological systems. Int J commons 1(1):43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Karev GP (2010) On mathematical theory of selection: continuous time population dynamics. J Math Biol 60(1):107–129

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I (2011) What can ecology teach us about cancer? Transl Oncol 4(5):266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I, Berezovskaya F, Castillo-Chavez C (2012) Transitional regimes as early warning signals in resource dependent competition models. Math Biosci 240(2):114–123

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kareva I, Morin B, Karev GP (2013) Preventing the tragedy of the commons through punishment of over consumers and encouragement of under-consumers. Bull Math Biol 75(4):565–588

  • Kareva I (2013) Biological stoichiometry in tumor micro-environments. PloS One 8(1):e51844

  • Kerbel RS, Klement G, Pritchard KI, Kamen B (2002) Continuous low-dose anti-angiogenic/metronomic chemotherapy: from the research laboratory into the oncology clinic. Ann Oncol 13(1):12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kermark MD, Mckendrick AG (1927) Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Part i. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol 115, pp 700–721

  • Krakauer DC, Page KM, Erwin DH (2009) Diversity, dilemmas, and monopolies of niche construction. Am Nat 173(1):26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance J (2012) Health chief warns: age of safe medicine is ending. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/health-chief-warns-age-of-safe-medicine-is-ending-7574579.html

  • Levin S, Castillo-Chavez C (1990) Topics in evolutionary ecology. In: Mathematical and statistical developments of evolutionary theory. Springer Netherlands, Chicago, pp 327–358

  • Lewontin RC (1970) The units of selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitch M, Cohen T, Murray M, Levin BR (2007) Antiviral resistance and the control of pandemic influenza. PLoS Med 4(1):e15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy M (2013) 800 samples showed antibiotic resistance last year, says agency as it backs Chief Medical Officer’s warning. The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/800-samples-showed-antibiotic-resistance-last-year-says-agency-as-it-backs-chief-medical-officers-warning-8530086.html

  • Meyer GA, Root RB (1996) Influence of feeding guild on insect response to host plant fertilization. Ecol Entomol 21(3):270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin BR, Fenichel EP, Castillo-Chavez C (2013) SIR dynamics with economically driven contact rates. Nat Resour Model 26(4):505–525

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Muneepeerakul R, Qubbaj MR, Aggarwal RM, Anderies JM, Janssen MA (2012) Critical transition between cohesive and population-dividing responses to change. J R Soc Interface 9(77):3303–3311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pasquier E, Kavallaris M, André N (2010) Metronomic chemotherapy: new rationale for new directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7(8):455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1970) On r- and K-selection. Am Nat 104(940):592–597

  • Rankin DJ, López-Sepulcre A (2005) Can adaptation lead to extinction? Oikos 111(3):616–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Armando A, Oguzhan Cifdaloz, Martin Anderies John, Jeffrey Dickeson (2011) Confronting management challenges in highly uncertain natural resource systems: a robustness-vulnerability trade-off approach. Environ Model Assess 16(1):15–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root BR (1965) The guild concept and community analysis. Bull Ecol Soc Am 46:177

    Google Scholar 

  • Root BR (2001) The guild concept. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 295–302

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg SA, Hellman S, DeVita VT (2005) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Dayan T (1991) The guild concept and the structure of ecological communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 22:115–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AT, Foggin JM (1999) The plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) is a keystone species for biodiversity on the Tibetan plateau. Anim Conserv 2(4):235–240

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN (2003) The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Prolif 36(3):131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by Grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF-Grant DMPS-0838705), the National Security Agency (NSA-Grant H98230-09-1-0104), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Office of the Provost of Arizona State University and Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCBI. This publication was made possible in part by Grant No. 1R01GM100471-01 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) at the National Institutes of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIGMS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Kareva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kareva, I., Morin, B. & Castillo-Chavez, C. Resource Consumption, Sustainability, and Cancer. Bull Math Biol 77, 319–338 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-9983-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-014-9983-1

Keywords

Navigation