Bulletin of Mathematical Biology

, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 344–357 | Cite as

A Simple Unforced Oscillatory Growth Model in the Chemostat

Original Article

Abstract

In a chemostat, transient oscillations in cell number density are often experimentally observed during cell growth. The aim of this paper is to propose a simple autonomous model which is able to generate these oscillations, and to investigate it analytically. Our point of view is based on a simplification of the cell cycle in which there are two states (mature and immature) with the transfer between the two dependent on the available resources. We use the mathematical global properties of competitive differential systems to prove the existence of a limit cycle. A comparison between our model and a more complex model consisting of partial differential equations is made with the help of numerical simulations, giving qualitatively similar results.

Keywords

Biochemical mechanisms Structured model Ordinary differential equations Chemostat Competitive system Oscillations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arino, J., Pilyugin, S., Wolkowicz, G., 2003. Considerations on yield, cellular growth, and competition in chemostat models. Can. Appl. Math. Q. 11, 107–141. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Cazzador, L., 1991. Analysis of oscillations in yeast continuous cultures by a new simplified model. Bull. Math. Biol. 53, 685–700. MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. de Roos, A.M., 1988. Numerical methods for structured population: the escalator boxcar train. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 4, 173–195. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hofbauer, J., Sigmund, K., 1988. The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems: Mathematical Aspects of Selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Lemesle, V., 2004. Modélisation structurée de la croissance cellulaire en chemostat: analyse et estimation. PhD Thesis, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University. http://tel.ccsd.cnrs.fr/documents/archives0/00/00/65/02/.
  6. Lemesle, V., Gouzé, J.-L., 2005. A biochemically based structured model for phytoplankton growth in the chemostat. Ecol. Complex. 2, 21–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Metz, J.A.J., Diekmann, O., 1986. The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations. Springer, New York. MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Monod, J., 1942. Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes. Herman, Paris. Google Scholar
  9. Nisbet, R., Gurney, W., 1982. Modelling Fluctuating Populations. Wiley, New York. MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Parulekar, S.J., Semones, G.B., Rolf, M.J., Lievense, J.C., Lim, H.C., 1986. Induction and elimination of oscillations in continuous cultures of Saccharomyces Cervisae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28, 700–710. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pascual, M., Caswell, H., 1997. From the cell cycle to population cycles in phytoplankton-nutrient interactions. Ecology 3, 897–912. Google Scholar
  12. Porro, D., Martegani, E., Ranzi, B.M., Alberghina, L., 1988. Oscillations in continuous cultures of budding yeast: a segregated parameter analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 32, 411–417. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sciandra, A., Harlay, J., Lefèvre, D., Lemée, R., Rimmelin, P., Denis, M., Gattuso, J.-P., 2003. Response of coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi to elevated partial pressure of CO2 under nitrogen limitation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 261, 111–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith, H., Waltman, P., 1995. The Theory of the Chemostat. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith, H., 1995. Monotone Dynamical Systems. An Introduction to the Theory of Competitive and Cooperative Systems. American Mathematical Society, Providence. MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Webb, G.F., 1995. Periodic and Chaotic Behavior in Structured Models of Cell Population Dynamics. Pitman Research Notes on Mathematical Series, vol. 324, pp. 40–49. Google Scholar
  17. Zhu, H.-R., Smith, H., 1994. Stable periodic orbits for a class of three dimensional competitive systems. J. Differ. Equ. 110, 143–156. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Mathematical Biology 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COMORE Project-teamINRIA Sophia AntipolisSophia Antipolis CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations