Abstract
A multipatch model is proposed to study the impact of travel on the spatial spread of disease between patches with different level of disease prevalence. The basic reproduction number for the ith patch in isolation is obtained along with the basic reproduction number of the system of patches, ℜ0. Inequalities describing the relationship between these numbers are also given. For a two-patch model with one high prevalence patch and one low prevalence patch, results pertaining to the dependence of ℜ0 on the travel rates between the two patches are obtained. For parameter values relevant for influenza, these results show that, while banning travel of infectives from the low to the high prevalence patch always contributes to disease control, banning travel of symptomatic travelers only from the high to the low prevalence patch could adversely affect the containment of the outbreak under certain ranges of parameter values. Moreover, banning all travel of infected individuals from the high to the low prevalence patch could result in the low prevalence patch becoming diseasefree, while the high prevalence patch becomes even more disease-prevalent, with the resulting number of infectives in this patch alone exceeding the combined number of infectives in both patches without border control. Under the set of parameter values used, our results demonstrate that if border control is properly implemented, then it could contribute to stopping the spatial spread of disease between patches.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arino, J., Jordan, R., van den Driessche, P., 2005. Quarantine in a multi-species epidemic model with spatial dynamics. Math. Biosci.
Arino, J., van den Driessche, P., 2003. A multi-city epidemic model. Math. Popul. Stud. 10, 175–193.
Arino, J., van den Driessche, P., 2006. Disease spread in metapopulations. In: Nonlinear Dynamics and Evolution Equations. Vol. 48. Fields Institute Communications.
Berman, A., Plemmons, R. J., 1979. Non-negative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences. Academic, New York.
Butler, D., 2006. Doubts hang over source of bird flu spread, Nature 439, 772.
Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C., 2003. Spatial Ecology via Reaction-Diffusion Equations. Wiley, New York.
Chowell, G., Rivas, A.L., Hengartner, N.W., Hyman, J.M., Castillo-Chavez, C., 2006. The role of spatial mixing in the spread of foot-and-mouth disease. Prev. Vet. Med. 73, 297–314.
Ferguson, N.M., Cummings, D.A.T., Cauchemez, S., Fraser, C., Riley, S., Meeyai, A., Iamsirithaworn, S., Burke, D. S., 2005. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in southeast Asia. Nature 437, 209–214.
Ferguson, N.M., Cummings, D.A.T., Fraser, C., Cajka, J.C., Cooley, P.C., Burke, D.S., 2006. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature 442, 448–452.
Fulford, G.R., Roberts, M.G., Heesterbeek, J.A.P., 2002. The metapopulation dynamics of an infectious disease: Tuberculosis in possums. Theor. Popul. Biol. 61, 15–29.
Germann, T.C., Kadau, K., Longini, I.M. Jr., Macken, C.A., 2006. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. PNAS 103, 5935–5940.
Hastings, A., 1983. Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theor. Popul. Biol. 24, 244–251.
Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R., 1985. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R., 1991. Topics in Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Hyman, J.M., LaForce, T., 2003. Modeling the spread of influenza among cities. In: Banks, H.T., Castillo-Chavez, C. (Eds.), Bioterrorism. SIAM, New York, pp. 211–236.
McPeek, M.A., Holt, R.D., 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140, 1010–1027.
Ruan, S., Wang, W., Levin, S.A., 2006. The effect of global travel on the spread of SARS. Math. Bios. Eng. 3, 205–218.
Salmani, M., van den Driessche, P., 2006. A model for disease transmission in a patchy environment. Disc. Cont. Dyna. Syst. Ser. B 6, 185–202.
Sattenspiel, L., Herring, D.A., 2003. Simulating the effect of quarantine on the spread of the 1918–1919 flu in central Canada. Bull. Math. Biol. 65, 1–26.
Smith, H.L., Waltman, P., 1995. The Theory of the Chemostat. Cambridge University Press, New York.
van den Driessche, P., Watmough, J., 2002. Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Math. Biosci. 180, 29–48.
Wang, W., Mulone, G., 2003. Threshold of disease transmission in a patchy environment. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 285, 321–335.
Wang, W., Zhao, X.-Q., 2004. An epidemic model in a patchy environment. Math. Biosci. 190, 97–112.
Wang, W., Zhao, X.-Q., 2006. An epidemic model with population dispersal and infection period. SIAM J. Appl. Math.
Summary of WHO measures related to international travel. Available at: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/travelupdate/en/. Accessed August 8, 2006.
World Health Organization (WHO), 2006. Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of Avian influenza A/(H5N1) reported to WHO. Available at: http://www. who. int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/country/cases_table_2006_08_08/en/index.html. Accessed August 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsieh, YH., van den Driessche, P. & Wang, L. Impact of Travel Between Patches for Spatial Spread of Disease. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 1355–1375 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9169-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9169-6