Abstract
The radial distribution function (RDF) approach has been applied to the study of the A1 adenosine receptors agonist effect of 32 adenosine analogues. A model able to describe more than 79% of the variance in the experimental activity was developed with the use of the mentioned approach. In contrast, none of the three different approaches, including the use of 2D autocorrelations, BCUT and 3D-MORSE descriptors were able to explain more than 72% of the variance in the mentioned property with the same number of variables in the equation. In addition, we established a comparison with other models reported by us for this receptor subtype using this data set, and the RDF descriptors continue getting the best results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, H., 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov, B.N., Csaki, F. (Eds.), Second International Symposium on Information Theory, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267–281.
Akaike, H., 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-19, 716–713.
Baraldi, P.G., Cacciari, B., Pineda de Las Infantas, M.J., Romagnoli, R., Spalluto, G., Volpini, R., Costanzi, S., Vittori, S., Cristalli, G., Melman, N., Park, K.S., Ji, X.D., Jacobson, K.A., 1998. Synthesis and biological activity of a new series of N6-arylcarbamoyl, 2-(Ar)alkynyl-N6-arylcarbamoyl, and N6-carboxamido derivatives of adenosine-5’-N-ethyluronamide as A1 and A3 adenosine receptor agonists. J. Med. Chem. 41(17), 3174–3185.
Bhattacharya, P., Leonard, J.T., Roy, K., 2005. Exploring QSAR of thiazole and thiadiazole derivatives as potent and selective human adenosine A3 receptor antagonists using FA and GFA techniques. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13(4), 1159–1165.
Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F., Stewart, J.J.P., 1985. AM1: A new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3902–3909.
Dhalla, A.K., Shryock, J.C., Shreeniwas, R., Belardinelli, L., 2003. Pharmacology and therapeutic applications of A1 adenosine receptor ligands. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 3(4), 369–385.
Frank, J., 1993. MOPAC, Seiler Research Laboratory. US Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, CO.
Fredholm, B.B., Ap, I.J., Jacobson, K.A., Klotz, K.N., Linden, J., 2001. International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 53(4), 527–552.
Fredholm, B.B., Arslan, G., Halldner, L., Kull, B., Schulte, G., Wasserman, W., 2000. Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 362(4–5), 364–374.
Gasteiger, J., Sadowski, J., Schuur, J., Selzer, P., Steinhauer, L., Steinhauer, V., 1996. Chemical Information in 3D Space. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 36, 1030–1037.
Gasteiger, J., Schuur, J., Selzer, P., Steinhauer, L., Steinhauer, V., Fresenius, J., 1997. Anal. Chem. 359, 50–59.
González, M.P., Teran, C., 2004a. QSAR study of N6-(substituted-phenylcarbamoyl) adenosine-5’-uronamides as agonist for A1 adenosine receptors. Bull. Math. Biol. 66(4), 907–920.
González, M.P., Teran, C., 2004b. A TOPS-MODE approach to predict adenosine kinase inhibition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14(12), 3077–3079.
González, M.P., Teran, C., 2004c. A TOPS-MODE approach to predict affinity for A1 adenosine receptors. 2-(Arylamino)adenosine analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12(11), 2985–2993.
González, M.P., Teran, C., Fall, Y., Teijeira, M., Besada, P., 2005. A radial distribution function approach to predict A(2B) agonist effect of adenosine analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13(3), 601–608.
González, M.P., Teran, C., Teijeira, M., Besada, P., 2005. Geometry, topology, and atom-weights assembly descriptors to predicting A1 adenosine receptors agonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15(10), 2641–2645.
Hawkins, D.M., 2004. The problem of overfitting. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44(1), 1–12.
Hemmer, M.C., Steinhauer, V., Gasteiger, J., 1999. The prediction of the 3D structure of organic molecules from their infrared spectra. Vibrat. Spectrosc. 19, 151–164.
Kiec-Kononowicz, K., Drabczynska, A., Pekala, E., Michalak, B., Muller, C.E., Schumacher, B., Karolak-Wojciechowska, J., Duddeck, H., Rockitt, S., Wartchow, R., 2001, New develoments in A1 and A2 adenosine receptor antagonists. Pure. Appl. Chem. 73(9), 1411–1420.
Klein, D.J., Randić, M., Babić, D., Lučić, B., Nikolić, S., Trinajstić, N., 1991. Hierarchical orthogonalization of descriptors. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 63(1), 215–222.
Kubinyi, H., 1994. Variable Selection in QSAR Studies. I. An evolutionary algorithm. Quant. Struct. Act. Relat. 13, 285–294.
Lučić, B., Nikolić, S., Trinajstić, N., Jurić, D., 1995. The Structure–property models can be improved using the orthogonalized descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 35, 532–538.
Muller, C.E., 2000. Adenosine receptor ligands—Recent developments. Part I. Agonists. Curr. Med. Chem. 7(12), 1269–1288.
Pearlman, R.S., Smith, K.M., 1997. In: H., Martin, Y., Folkers, G. (Eds.), 3D-QSAR and Drug Design: Recent Advances Kubinyi. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 339–353.
Poulsen, S.A., Quinn, R.J., 1998. Adenosine receptors: New opportunities for future drugs. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 6(6), 619–641.
Randić, M., 1991a. Orthogonal molecular descriptors. New J. Chem. 15(7), 517–525.
Randić, M., 1991b. Resolution of ambiguities in structure–property studies by use of orthogonal descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 31, 311–320.
Soudijn, W., van Wijngaarden, I., Ap, I.J., 2003. Medicinal chemistry of adenosine A1 receptor ligands. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 3(4), 355–367.
Statsoft, I., 2002. STATISTICA (data analysis software system).
Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., 2000. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Wiley-VCH, Mannheim, pp. 667.
Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., Pavan, M., 2002. Dragon Software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González, M.P., Terán, C., Teijeira, M. et al. QSAR Studies Using Radial Distribution Function for Predicting A1 Adenosine Receptors Agonists. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 347–359 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9127-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-006-9127-3