Environmental and economic comparison of waste solvent treatment options
The sustainable development and consumption need more efficient use of natural resources. As a consequence, the use of industrial solvents demands their recovery instead of end-of-pipe treatment. It is not always clear, however, which treatment alternative should be applied. Based on an industrial case study, the environmental and economic evaluation and comparison of the treatment alternatives of a non-ideal solvent mixture containing azeotropes is investigated for determining the preferable option. For the recovery of the industrial solvent mixture, two different separation alternatives are evaluated: a less effective alternative and a novel design based on hybrid separation tools. An end-of-pipe treatment alternative, incineration, is also considered and the split of the solvent mixtures between recovery and incineration is investigated. The environmental evaluation of the alternatives is carried out using ‘Eco-indicator 99 life-cycle impact assessment methodology’. Economic investigation is also accomplished. The economic features clearly favour the total recovery, however, the environmental evaluation detects that if a recovery process of low efficiency is applied, its environmental burden can be similar or even higher than that of the incineration. This motivates engineers to design more effective recovery processes and reconsider the evaluation of process alternatives at environmental decision making.
KeywordsWaste solvent treatment life cycle assessment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- World Commission on Environment and Development (“Brundtland Committee”): Our Common future, Oxford Univ. Press., 1987.Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards Program, EPA 744-K-96-001, 1996.Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards Program, EPA 744-S-97-001, 1997.Google Scholar
- T.B. Hofstetter, C. Capello, K. Hungerbühler: “Environmentally preferable treatment options for industrial waste solvent management — A Case Study of a Toluene Containing Waste Solvent”, Trans I. Chem. E, Vol. 81, Part B, (2003), pp. 189–202.Google Scholar
- M. Goedkoop and R. Spriensma: The Eco-indicator 99, a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Assessment, Methodolgy Report, Pre Consultants, the Netherlands, 2000, www.pre.nl.Google Scholar
- ISO 14040: Life cycle assessment-principles and framework, 1997.Google Scholar
- H. Wenzel, M. Hauschild and L. Alting: Environmental Assessment of Products-Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development, Chapman & Hall, London, 1997.Google Scholar
- T. Hofstetter: Abfalösunsmittelbewirtschaftung in der chemischen Industrie, Forschungsprogramm UAW, Bundesamtes für Energie, 2002.Google Scholar
- Sima Pro 5.1, more details at http://www.pre.nl/simapro/default.htm.
- P. Mizsey, A. Raab, J. Manczinger, A. Szanyi and Z. Fonyo: Intensification of a Solvent Recovery Technology Through the Use of Hybrid Equipment, Oral lecture on ESCAPE 12, Danemark, Haag, 2002.Google Scholar
- A. Raab: Separation of a Highly Nonideal Mixture for Solvent Recovery, Thesis (Diploma), Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hungary, Budapest 2001.Google Scholar
- P.T. Anastas and J.C. Warner: Green Chemistry, Theory and Praxis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
- Ch. Seyler: Ein inputabhängiges Ökoinventar-Modell für die thermische Verwertung von Abfall-Lösungsmittel in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie, Thesis (PhD), Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, 2003.Google Scholar
- J.M. Douglas: Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
- “Economic indicators”, Chemical Engineering, Vol. 111, (2004), pp. 79–80.Google Scholar