Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) language model, holds significant promise for improving the quality and efficiency of teaching and learning. However, its potential challenges and disruptions in education systems require further investigation for a deeper understanding and mitigation. Given that ChatGPT is already being utilized and complete prohibition is unlikely, it becomes crucial to consider how educators can harness its potential to enhance teaching and learning experiences, assuming successful implementation. This article explores the potential benefits and disruptions within the current education system, and proposes strategies for integrating ChatGPT into educational settings from a constructivist learning perspective. It focuses on four educational system attributes: context, collaboration, conversation, and construction. The article particularly emphasizes the utilization of ChatGPT as a means, rather than an end, to enhance student learning within a constructivist learning environment. This approach aims to address present concerns and challenges effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023). Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), Article 429.

  • Alshater, M. M., (2022). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Academic Performance: A Case Study of ChatGPT. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312358

  • Başer, V. G., & Mutlu, N. (2011). Analyzing pre-service elementary teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2(4), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture (Vol. 3). Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, L., & Dede, C. (2023). Navigating a world of generative AI: Suggestions for educators. The Next Level Lab at Harvard Graduate School of Education. President and Fellows of Harvard College: Cambridge.

  • Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y

  • Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

  • Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis and systematic review of the effect of Chatbot technology use in sustainable education. Sustainability, 15(4), Article 2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042940

  • D'Mello, S., Olney, A., Williams, C., & Hays, P. (2012). Gaze tutor: A gaze-reactive intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(5), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (2013). Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–15.

  • Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, C. A., Howard, F. M., Markov, N. S., Dyer, E. C., Ramesh, S., Luo, Y., & Pearson, A. T. (2022). Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610

  • Hu, G. (2023). Challenges for enforcing editorial policies on AI-generated papers. Accountability in Research, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2184262

  • Huang, K. (2023). Alarmed by A.I. chatbots, universities start revamping how they teach. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/16/technology/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-universities.html

  • Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615

  • Jain, M., Kumar, P., Bhansali, I., Liao, Q., Truong, K., & Patel, S. (2018). FarmChat: A conversational agent to answer farmer queries. Proceedings of ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 215–239). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. B. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap, R. (2023). A first chat with ChatGPT: The first step in the road-map for AI (Artificial Intelligence). https://doi.org/10.32388/DFE2XG

  • Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

  • Kim, H. S., Cha, Y., & Kim, N. Y. (2021). Effects of AI chatbots on EFL students’ communication skills. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21, 712–734. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.21..202108.712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023). Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 973–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, G. R. (2020). Constructivism and its risks in artificial intelligence. Prometheus, 36(4), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.36.4.0322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makewa, L. N. (2019). Constructivism theory in technology-based learning. In Technology-Supported Teaching and Research Methods for Educators (pp. 268–287). IGI Global.

  • Mann, D. L. (2023). Artificial intelligence discusses the role of artificial intelligence in translational medicine: A JACC: Basic to translational science interview with ChatGPT. Basic to Translational Science, 8(2), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.01.001

  • Miller, J., White, S., & Johnson, D. (2019). OCLC research works in progress webinar: Deakin Genie [Webinar]. Deakin University. https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/presentations/2019/Deakin-Genie.pdf

  • Naumova, E. N. (2023). A mistake-find exercise: A teacher’s tool to engage with information innovations, ChatGPT, and their analogs. Journal of Public Health Policy, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-023-00400-1

  • OpenAI. (2022). ChatGPT: Optimizing language models for dialogue. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/

  • Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

  • Owston, R (2023). Contact North | Contact Nord to launch two new AI-powered tools at OEB Berlin, Online Educa Berlin (OEB) Insight. https://oeb.global/oeb-insights/contact-north-contact-nord-to-launch-two-new-ai-powered-tools-at-oeb-berlin/

  • Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

  • Reigeluth, C.M. (2012). Instructional theory and technology for the new paradigm of education. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 32, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/50/1b

  • Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

  • Sallam, M. (2023). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research and practice: Systematic review on the future perspectives and potential limitations. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19.23286155

  • Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective. Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2019). Systems thinking for principals of learning-focused schools. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 4(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v4i1.1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology, 307(2), e230163. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163

  • Supiano, B. (2023). Will ChatGPT change how professors assess learning? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 69(18), 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terwiesch, C. (2023). Would Chat GPT3 get a Wharton MBA? A prediction based on its performance in the operations management course. Mack Institute for Innovation Management at the Wharton School: University of Pennsylvania.

  • Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879

  • Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R., & Söllner, M. (2018). Unleashing the potential of chatbots in education: A state-of-the-art analysis. Academy of management annual meeting (AOM). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15903abstract

  • Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet?-A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924

  • Wu, E. H. K., Lin, C. H., Ou, Y. Y., Liu, C. Z., Wang, W. K., & Chao, C. Y. (2020). Advantages and constraints of a hybrid model K-12 E-learning assistant chatbot. Ieee Access, 8, 77788–77801. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN, Article 4312418. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4312418

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA

    Minkyoung Kim & Lauren Adlof

Authors
  1. Minkyoung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lauren Adlof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minkyoung Kim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Adlof, L. Adapting to the Future: ChatGPT as a Means for Supporting Constructivist Learning Environments. TechTrends 68, 37–46 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00899-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00899-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation