Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Different Grouping Methods in Asynchronous Online Instruction: Social Presence and Student Satisfaction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Improving social presence has long been a goal for online instruction; with the shift to emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus on improving social presence has only become more imperative. In asynchronous online courses, social interaction typically relies on discussion groups. Despite this, little research has been done on student grouping practices in these courses and existing research focusing on grouping methods and social presence has yielded contradictory results. This study examines peer and instructor social presence in a fixed discussion group (Permanent Small Group) compared to groups that frequently changed in size and membership (Variably-Sized Group) at a large southeastern state university. Quantitative and qualitative analysis methods were used to track the number of posts from each group and to determine the perception of peer and instructor social presence among members of each group. Findings indicate that no statistical significance exits in terms of social presence between the two grouping methods. In addition, this research indicates that correlation between the social presence and student satisfaction is low, though it was observed that the Permanent Small Groups yielded more discussion posts than the Variably-Sized Groups. While this empirical study did not conclusively justify its hypotheses, it reveals the complex relationship between social presence and grouping methods. Furthermore, it contributes to the scarce research in this field and highlights further research opportunities focused on the impacts of social presence and grouping for online teaching in the pandemic and post-pandemic eras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Afify, M. K. (2019). The influence of group size in the asynchronous online discussions on the development of critical thinking skills, and on improving students’ performance in online discussion forum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(5), 132–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2016). Increasing social presence in online learning through small group discussions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Mulhim, E., & Eldokhny, A. (2020). The impact of collaborative group size on students’ achievement and product quality in project-based learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(10), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bristol, T. J., & Kyarsgaard, V. (2012). Asynchronous discussion: A comparison of larger and smaller discussion group size. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(6), 386–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Li, M., Chang, W., & Chen, X. (2021). Developing a Topic Analysis Instant Feedback System to facilitate asynchronous online discussion effectiveness. Computers & Education, 163, 104095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104095

  • Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3), 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann, J., Rummel, N., Christmann, N., Elson, M., Hecking, T., Herrmann, T., & Wichmann, A. (2017). Challenges in implementing small group collaboration in large online courses. International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flener-Lovitt, C., Bailey, K., & Han, R. (2020). Using structured teams to develop social presence in asynchronous chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2519–2525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. R., Calzo, J. P., Eiduson, R., Sharp, K., Silverstein, S., Lopez, E., & Reisner, S. L. (2021). Asynchronous online focus groups for health research: Case study and lessons learned. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921990489

  • Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International journal of educational telecommunications, 1(2), 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2011). Higher-level knowledge construction in asynchronous online discussions: An analysis of group size, duration of online discussion, and student facilitation techniques. Instructional Science, 39(3), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbeck, R., & Hartman, J. (2018). Efficient strategies for maximizing online student satisfaction: Applying technologies to increase cognitive presence, social presence, and teaching presence. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), n3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2013). Influence of group size on students’ participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 62, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E., & Akcaoglu, M. (2017). Sociability of online learning environments: Examining discussion group sizes and social network sites. In M. Spector, B. Lockee, & M. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology (pp. 1–16). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_39-2

  • Liaw, S., & Huang, H. (2000). Enhancing interactivity in web-based instruction: A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2020). Social presence and online discussions: A mixed method investigation. Distance Education, 41(4), 490–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano Jr, N. C., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, 37(6), 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcelrath, K. (2020). Schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic. Census.gov (August 26). Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2020/08/schooling-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.html

  • Natarajan, J., & Joseph, M. A. (2022, January). Impact of emergency remote teaching on nursing students’ engagement, social presence, and satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Forum, 57(1), 42–48.

  • Öztok, M., & Kehrwald, B. A. (2017). Social presence reconsidered: moving beyond, going back, or killing social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, C. W., Guffey, S. K., Williams, D. S., Estis, J. M., & Lewis, D. (2021). Fostering cognitive presence, social presence and teaching presence with integrated online: Team-based learning. TechTrends, 65(4), 473–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2011). Learning through discussions: Comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, B., Wang, M., & Guo, W. (2018, July). The influence of grouping/non-grouping strategies upon student interaction in online forum: A social network analysis. In 2018 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp.173–177). IEEE.

  • Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Does mobile instant messaging facilitate social presence in online communication? A two-stage study of higher education students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltonen-Moore, S., Stuart, D., & Newton, E. (2006). From virtual strangers to a cohesive online learning community: The evolution of online group development in a professional development course. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 14(2), 287–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, A. L. (2015). Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Online Learning, 19(2), n2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., & Rosé, C. P. (2013, December). Turn on, tune in, drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the 2013 NIPS Data-driven education workshop (Vol. 11, p. 14).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Libraries, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA

    Celia Shi, Kelly Diamond & Miranda Smith

Authors
  1. Celia Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelly Diamond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miranda Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Celia Shi.

Ethics declarations

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the West Virginia University (WVU) Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Ethics approval number is 2010138063).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1: Social Presence and Students Satisfaction Survey

Appendix 1: Social Presence and Students Satisfaction Survey

figure a

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, C., Diamond, K. & Smith, M. Different Grouping Methods in Asynchronous Online Instruction: Social Presence and Student Satisfaction. TechTrends 67, 637–647 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00876-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00876-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation