Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What’s in a Name? The Meaning of “Learning, Design, and Technology”

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The educational/instructional technology field has used several names throughout its history in an effort to communicate the focus of teaching and scholarship in the field. This qualitative study explored the thought process of four faculty members whose programs adopted the name “Learning, Design, and Technology.” Findings indicate the meaning, order, and grouping of words was the subject of careful thought, with an overarching goal of communicating the values and identity of their programs and the wider field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AECT (n.d.). The Definition and Terminology Committee. https://aect.org/news_manager.php?page=17578. Accessed 21 Oct 2022

  • Branch, R. M., & Deissler, C. H. (2008). Processes. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 195–211). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R. M., Lee, H. & Tseng, S. S. (2019). Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, Vol. 42. Springer International.

  • Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational Technology a Primer for the 21st century. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Januszewski, A., & Molenda, M. (2008). Educational technology: A definition with commentary. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, P., & Wilson, B. G. (2010). Labels DO matter! A critique of AECT’s redefinition of the field. TechTrends, 54(1), 38–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M., & Boling, E. (2008). Creating. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 81–139). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M., & Robinson, R. (2008). Values. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (pp. 241–258). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A. (2001). A History of Instructional Design and Technology: Part II: A History of Instructional Design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(2), 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. A., & Ely, D. P. (1997). The field of educational technology as reflected through its definitions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seels, B. B., & Richey, R. C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition of the field. Association for Educational Communications and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2015). Introduction. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of educational technology. Sage

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penny Thompson.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflicts of interests/Competing interests

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Interview Questions

  1. 1.

    Please describe the organizational structure of your institution and how your LDT program or department fits?

  2. 2.

    Can you tell me a little bit about the process for how you made the change from your previous name to LDT

  3. 3.

    Do you think the name change had an influence on the development of your program or any program changes that occurred after the name change? Are you a different program now than you would have been if you’d kept the old name?

  4. 4.

    Do you think the name change has changed in any way the type of students you recruit to your program?

  5. 5.

    Have you noticed any difference in the type of positions your students are hired into after graduation?

  6. 6.

    Have you noticed any difference since the name change in the faculty your recruit when you are hiring?

  7. 7.

    Is there anything else you think is important about the use of the LDT name in our field that we haven’t talked about yet?

In addition to these standard prompts, each participant was asked a question to follow up on something specific they included in their response to the online questionnaire.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thompson, P. What’s in a Name? The Meaning of “Learning, Design, and Technology”. TechTrends 67, 277–284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00814-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00814-w

Keywords

Navigation