This study was conducted to examine the design of a face-to-face undergraduate educational technology course for preservice teachers. The design of the course used Grossman et al.’s (2009) pedagogies of practice to emphasize the blended teaching practices of teachers in the university’s nine placement districts and designing instruction for technology-rich and blended environments. Using Schmidt et al.’s (2009) technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) survey, Harris et al.’s (2010) Technology Integration Assessment Rubric, lesson plan reflections, and course reflections, this study investigates using the pedagogies of practice to design a course that prepares preservice teachers to teach with technology in technology-rich and blended environments. Results indicate statistically significant growth in preservice teachers’ teaching and technology self-perceptions, technological pedagogical knowledge, and overall TPACK application after the completion of the course. Suggestions for research and practice are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological and pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
Archambault, L. (2011). The practitioner's perspective on teacher education: Preparing for the K-12 online classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(1), 73–91. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/31410/
Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1) https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/examining-tpack-among-k-12-online-distance-educators-in-the-united-states
Archambault, L., DeBruler, K., & Freidhoff, J. (2014). K-12 online and blended teacher licensure: Striking a balance between policy and preparedness. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 83–106 https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/112361/
Arnesen, K. T., Graham, C. R., Short, C. R., & Archibald, D. (2019). Experiences with personalized learning in a blended teaching course for preservice teachers. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(3), 251–274.
Auerbach, C. F., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.
Bakir, N. (2015). An exploration of contemporary realities of technology and teacher education: Lessons learned. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(3), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1040930
Betrus, A. (2012). Historical evolution of instructional technology in teacher education programs: A ten-year update. TechTrends, 56(5), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0597-x
Bolick, C. M., & Cooper, J. M. (2015). Classroom management and technology. In E. Emmer & E. J. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed., pp. 479–495). Routledge.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy of Sciences.
Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782615
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Britten, J. S., & Cassady, J. C. (2005). The technology integration assessment instrument: Understanding planned use of technology by classroom teachers. Computers in the Schools, 22(3–4), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v22n03_05
Buss, R. R., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Lindsey, L. (2015). Preparing teachers to integrate technology into K-12 instruction: Comparing a stand-alone course with a technology infused approach. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(4), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1055012
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73 https://www.learntechlib.org/p/52307/
Consortium for School Networking. (2020). The state of ed tech leadership in, 2020. https://www.ed-fi.org/assets/2020/05/CoSN_EdTechLeadership_2020.pdf
Darling-Hammond, L., Banks, J., Zumwalt, K., Gomez, L., Gamoran Sherin, M., Griesdorn, J., & Finn, L. (2005). Educational goals and purposes: Developing a curricular vision for teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 169–200). Jossey-Bass.
Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: The question of effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49–64.
Foulger, T. S., Buss, R. R., Wetzel, K., & Lindsey, L. (2012). Preservice teacher education: Benchmarking a stand-alone ed tech course in preparation for change. Journal of Digital Learning Teacher Education, 29(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784704
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions (pp. 3-21). In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer.
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.
Graham, C. R. (2019). Current research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 173–188). Routledge.
Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x
Graham, C. R., Borup, J., Pulham, E., & Larsen, R. (2019). K–12 blended teaching readiness: Model and instrument development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1586601
Graham, C. R., Borup, J., Jensen, M. A., Arnesen, K. T., & Short, C. R. (2021). K-12 blended teaching competencies. In C. R. Graham, J. Borup, M. A. Jensen, K. T. Arnesen, & C. R. Short (Eds.), K-12 blended teaching (Vol. 2): A guide to practice within the disciplines. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/k12blended2/competencies
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100 http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15018
Hall, J. A. (2018). Flipping with the first principles of instruction: An examination of preservice teachers’ technology integration development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1494520
Hall, J. A., Lei, J., & Wang, Q. (2020). The first principles of instruction: An examination of their impact on preservice teachers’ TPACK. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(6), 3115–3142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09866-2
Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. J. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In C. D. Maddux, D. Gibson, & B. Dodge (Eds.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2010 (pp. 323–331). Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education.
Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to example teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328533
Hofer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a secondary M.a.Ed. program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782598
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
International Society for Technology in Education (2016). ISTE standards for students. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students
International Society for Technology in Education (2017). ISTE standards for educators. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators
Janssen, F., Grossman, P., & Westbroek, H. (2015). Facilitating decomposition and recomposition in practice-based teacher education: The power of modularity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.009
Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782466
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 101–111). Springer.
Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers’ lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.228
Kopcha, T. J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Jung, J., & Baser, D. (2014). Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures. Computers & Education, 78, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.003
Lee, C., & Kim, C. M. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(4), 437–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9335-8
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Sage.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054 https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=12516
Mouza, C., Karchmer-Klein, R., Nandakumar, R., Ozden, S. Y., & Hu, L. (2014). Investigating the impact of an integrated approach to the development of preservice teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 71, 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.020
Nelson, M. J., & Hawk, N. A. (2020). The impact of field experiences on prospective preservice teachers’ technology integration beliefs and intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103006
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C. R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227–233.
Ozgun-Koca, S. A. (2009). The views of preservice teachers about the strengths and limitations of the use of graphing calculators in mathematics instruction. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(2), 203–227 https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26268/
Prescott, J. E., Bundschuh, K., Kazakoff, E. R., & Macaruso, P. (2018). Elementary school-wide implementation of a blended learning program for reading intervention. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1302914
Project Tomorrow (2021). Education leadership brief: Examining the evolving digital responsibilities of school principals: findings and insights from the Speak Up Research Project. https://tomorrow.org/speakup/evolving-digital-leadership.html
Sanders, R. K., Kopcha, T. J., Neumann, K. L., Brynteson, K., & Bishop, C. (2019). Maker’s workshop: A framework to support learning through making. Tech Trends, 63(4), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0328-z
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
Shambaugh, N., & Magliaro, S. G. (2006). Instructional design: A systematic approach for reflective practice. Pearson.
Shand, K., & Farrelly, S. G. (2017). Using blended teaching to teach blended learning: Lessons learned from preservice teachers in an instructional methods course. Journal of Online Learning Research, 3(1), 5–30 https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/172566/
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1183
tpack.org. (2012). Using the TPACK image. http://matt-koehler.com/tpack2/using-the-tpack-image/
U.S. Department of Education (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education: 2017 national education technology plan update. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1498039
Willingham, D. T. (2002). Allocating student study time: “Massed” versus “distributed” practice. American Educator, 26(2), 37–39 https://www.aft.org/periodical/american-educator/summer-2002/ask-cognitive-scientist
Wolff, C. E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2015). Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549810
Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 376–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112445789
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the researchers’ institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. It was approved by the researchers’ institutional review board.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to Publish
Participants signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Neumann, K.L., Alvarado-Albertorio, F. & Ramírez-Salgado, A. Aligning with Practice: Examining the Effects of a Practice-Based Educational Technology Course on Preservice Teachers’ Potential to Teach with Technology. TechTrends 65, 1027–1041 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00672-y
- Practice-based teacher education
- Teacher preparation
- Pedagogies of practice
- Blended learning