Abstract
The use of heuristics as an instructional strategy enable instructors to provide students with problem-solving strategies that can be adapted and modified for different contexts and experiences. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of heuristics by students and gain insight into the thought process behind their problem-solving skills. The study used an adaptive narrative as an information delivery medium. An adaptive narrative was chosen because it could be designed to simulate decision-making processes encountered in real-world situations. Students enrolled in an introductory biology major class were chosen for the study because their fields of interest all require complex problem solving and decision-making skills. It was of interest to investigate what decisions were made when heuristics were given and how that may influence their rationale in the decision-making process. The results of this study indicate that: heuristics can enable students to make correct decisions when the heuristics are based on already familiar concepts; although students self-reported low cognitive load challenges in the NASA TLX, most of the explanations were deemed poor when graded by rubrics; students had difficulty transferring information learned in the narrative and synthesizing a complete and complex explanation past three data points. This study provides evidence that greater practice in the transfer of information to novel settings is important in education for students to become proficient in complex decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Storytelling as a pedagogical tool in higher education. Education, 118(3), 440.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://visionandchange.org/files/2013/11/aaas-VISchange-web1113.pdf
Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695.
Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 505–518). New York: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39.
Betsch, C., Ulshöfer, C., Renkewitz, F., & Betsch, T. (2011). The influence of narrative v. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Medical Decision Making : An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 31(5), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X11400419.
Bowen, C. W. (1994). Think-aloud methods in chemistry education: Understanding student thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p184.
Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education : JUNE : A Publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 12(1), E6–E10.
Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., et al. (2009). Science communication reconsidered. Nature Biotechnology, 27(6), 514–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0609-514.
Campbell, T. A. (2012). Digital storytelling in an elementary classroom: Going beyond entertainment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.424.
Campbell, T. A., & Hlusek, M. (2015). Storytelling for fluency and flair: A performance-based approach. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 157–161.
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement_4), 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111.
de Lima, E. S., Feijó, B., Barbosa, S. D. J., Furtado, A. L., Ciarlini, A. E. M., & Pozzer, C. T. (2014). Draw your own story: Paper and pencil interactive storytelling. Entertainment Computing, 5(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2013.06.004.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215.
Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2000). Examining information processing on the world wide web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology, 2(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0203_2.
Fischer, M. A., Mazor, K. M., Baril, J., Alper, E., DeMarco, D., & Pugnaire, M. (2006). Learning from mistakes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(5), 419–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00420.x.
Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(Suppl), 13583–13584. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414635111.
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482.
Göbel, S., Wendel, V., Ritter, C., & Steinmetz, R. (2010). Personalized, adaptive digital educational games using narrative game-based learning objects. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on E-Learning and Games, Edutainment 2010, (August), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14533-9_45.
González, H. L., Palencia, A. P., Umaña, L. A., Galindo, L., & Villafrade, M. L. A. (2008). Mediated learning experience and concept maps: A pedagogical tool for achieving meaningful learning in medical physiology students. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(4), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00021.2007.
Herman, D. (2007). Storytelling and the sciences of mind: Cognitive Narratology, discursive psychology, and narratives in face-to-face interaction. Narrative, 15(3), 306–334. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2007.0023.
Hoonakker, P., Carayon, P., Gurses, A. P., Brown, R., Khunlertkit, A., McGuire, K., & Walker, J. M. (2011). Measuring workload of ICU nurses with a questionnaire survey: the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 1(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2011.609524.
Hopfer, S. (2012). Effects of a narrative HPV vaccination intervention aimed at reaching college women: A randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science : The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 13(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0254-1.
Hung, C. M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2011). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368–379 Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov.proxy.lib.odu.edu/?q=storytelling+and+science&ff1=pubJournal+Articles&id=EJ992969.
Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69(2), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.019.
Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J.-L., Huang, Y.-M., Hsu, G.-L., & Lin, Y.-C. (2016). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using Web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.927367.
Illes, J., Moser, M. A., McCormick, J. B., Racine, E., Blakeslee, S., Caplan, A., et al. (2010). Neurotalk: Improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2773.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613.
Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 95–119.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504994.
Kerski, J. J. (2015). Geo-awareness, geo-enablement, Geotechnologies, citizen science, and storytelling: Geography on the world stage. Geography Compass, 9(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12193.
King-Okoye, M., & Arber, A. (2014). “It stays with me”: the experiences of second- and third-year student nurses when caring for patients with cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 23(4), 441–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12139.
Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1187/05-06-0082.
Kreps Frisch, J., & Saunders, G. (2008). Using stories in an introductory college biology course. Journal of Biological Education, 42(4), 164–169.
Kreuter, M. W., Green, M. C., Cappella, J. N., Slater, M. D., Wise, M. E., Storey, D., et al. (2007). Narrative communication in cance0r prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02879904.
Lee, C.K., & Tseng, S.J. (2012). Strategies of implementing digital storytelling for improving English oral competence. INTED2012: International Technology, Education and Development Conference, 250–255.
Mazor, K. M., Baril, J., Dugan, E., Spencer, F., Burgwinkle, P., & Gurwitz, J. H. (2007). Patient education about anticoagulant medication: Is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective? Patient Education and Counseling, 69(1–3), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.010.
McClary, L., & Talanquer, V. (2011). Heuristic reasoning in chemistry: Making decisions about acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1433–1454. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.528463.
Mokhtar, N. H., Halim, M. F. A., & Kamarulzaman, S. Z. S. (2011). The effectiveness of storytelling in enhancing communicative skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.024.
Morais, C. (2015). Storytelling with chemistry and related hands-on activities: Informal learning experiences to prevent “chemophobia” and promote young children’s scientific literacy. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5002416.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2013). Designing effective instruction (7th ed). Wiley.
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032.
Plomer, M., Jessen, K., Rangelov, G., & Meyer, M. (2010). Teaching physics in a physiologically meaningful manner. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020116.
Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Sarsfield, E. (2014). Differences between novices’ and experts’ solving ill-structured problems. Public Health Nursing, 31(5), 444–453. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12100.
Simmons, B., Lanuza, D., Fonteyn, M., Hicks, F., & Holm, K. (2003). Clinical reasoning in experienced nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(6), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903253092.
Steiner, K. E., & Tomkins, J. (2004). Narrative event adaptation in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interface - IUI ‘04 (p. 46). New York, New York, USA: ACM press. https://doi.org/10.1145/964442.964453.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5.
Tan, M., Lee, S. S., & Hung, D. W. (2014). Digital storytelling and the nature of knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 19(3), 623–635.
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2005). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Understanding the wrong answers—Teaching toward conceptual change. Cell Biology Education, 4(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068.
Tawfik, A. A., Rong, H., & Choi, I. (2015). Failing to learn: towards a unified design approach for failure-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 975–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9399-0.
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Précis of simple heuristics that make us smarte. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 727–780.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
Vicary, A. M., & Fraley, R. C. (2007). Choose your own adventure: Attachment dynamics in a simulated relationship. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(9), 1279–1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207303013.
Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript. The authors obtained IRB approval and informed consent from participants prior to the commencement of data collection.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Csikar, E., Stefaniak, J. The Use of Heuristics in Adaptive Narratives to Inform Decision-Making Practices. TechTrends 65, 90–100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00558-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00558-5