Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Group Cohesion, Attitude, and Academic Achievement in Collaborative Learning Environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although collaborative-learning as an instructional method has shown promising results since the 1970’s, a number of significant problems within collaborative learning environments have been encountered. These problems relate to aspects of group dynamics including group cohesion, participation, communication, collaboration, and trust. Although the literature suggests various instructional techniques to increase group cohesion and learners’ attitudes towards group learning environments, new methods and techniques should be explored in order to address and eliminate these problems. Gamification, which is the use of game elements and techniques in non-gaming environments, can be leveraged as a new method in order to increase group cohesion and group performance within collaborative learning environments. The aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of gamification (both online and face-to-face) on the attitudes of students towards group learning environments, their course, group cohesion, and their academic achievement. The study aims to promote learners’ collaboration in groups utilizing gamification elements. In this quasi-experimental design study, gamified (44 students) and traditional (48 students) groups were compared. Although no significant difference was established between the gamified and traditional groups in terms of students’ attitudes towards group learning environments and the course, the gamified group outperformed the traditional group in terms of group cohesion scores and team member evaluation scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Abramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: It depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alsancak, D. (2010). The Investigation of the Relationship between Transactive Memory with Group Cohesion, Group Atmosphere and Performance in Computer Supported Collaboration Learning Environments (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.

  • Anbarli Kirkiz (2010). Öğrencilerin İngilizce Dersine ait Tutumlari ile Akademik Başarilari Arasindaki İlişki (Master Thesis). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.

  • Attali, Y., & Arieli-Attali, M. (2015). Gamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance? Computers in Education, 83, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Engaging engineering students with Gamification: An empirical study. In 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES). IEEE eXpress Conference Publishing.

  • Buckley, P., & Doyle, E. (2017). Individualising gamification: An investigation of the impact of learning styles and personality traits on the efficacy of gamification using a prediction market. Computers in Education, 106, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunchball. (2010). Gamification 101: An introduction to game dynamics [White paper]. Retrieved from http://jndglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/gamification1011.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2018.

  • Çakıroğlu, Ü., Başıbüyük, B., Güler, M., Atabay, M., & Yılmaz Memiş, B. (2017). Gamifying an ICT course: Influences on engagement and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open courses. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codish, D., & Ravid, G. (2014). Academic course gamification: The art of perceived playfulness. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10, 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A. S., & De Melo Filho, I. J. (2016). Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V. H. S., Reis, H. M., & Isotani, S. (2014). A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing - SAC ‘14 (Vol. 60, pp. 216–222). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2554850.2554956.

  • De-Marcos, L., Garcia-Lopez, E., & Garcia-Cabot, A. (2016). On the effectiveness of game-like and social approaches in learning: Comparing educational gaming, gamification & social networking. Computers in Education, 95, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘13 (pp. 763–772). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470763.

  • Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., OʼHara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non- gaming contexts. In Proceedings. CHI EA ‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2425–2428). New York: ACM.

  • Dickey, M. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers in Education, 63, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-Walter, Z., Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Tjondronegoro, D., & Scott-Parker, B. (2017). Driven to drive? Investigating the effect of gamification on learner driver behavior, perceived motivation and user experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flatla, D. R., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L. E., Bateman, S., & Mandryk, R. L. (2011). Calibration games: making calibration tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game elements. In Proceedings, 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST ‘11 (pp. 403–412). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2047196.2047248.

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenlee, B. J., & Karanxha, Z. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohort and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(11), 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277511000501101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakulinen, L., & Auvinen, T. (2014). The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. In Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, LATICE 2014 (pp. 9–16). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2014.10.

  • Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Empirical study on the effect of achievement badges in TRAKLA2 online learning environment. In Proceedings of Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) Conference (pp. 47–54). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.34.

  • Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In R. H. Sprague, Jr. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 3025–3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377.

  • Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Computers in Education, 80, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogveld, A., & Paas, F. (2002). Exploring teachers’ instructional design practices from a systems design perspective. Instructional Science, 30(43), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. Paper presented at the AAAI 19th National Conference On Artificial Intelligence (Workshop on Challenges in Game AI). San Jose, CA.

  • Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2011). "Gamification" from the perspective of service marketing. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Gamification workshop) Vancouver, Canada.

  • Jackson, G. T., & McNamara, D. S. (2013). Motivation and performance in a game-based intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 1036–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Song, K., Lockee, B., & Burton, J. (2018). Gamification in learning and education: Enjoy learning like gaming. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47283-6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knutas, A., Ikonen, J., Nikula, U., & Porras, J. (2014). Increasing collaborative communications in a programming course with gamification. In B. Rachev & A. Smrikarov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on computer systems and technologies - CompSysTech ‘14 (pp. 370–377). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2659532.2659620.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kouros C, Abrami PC (2006) How do students really feel about working in small groups? The role of student attitudes and behaviours in cooperative classroom settings. Paper presented 2006 The American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, April, 2006, San Fransisco, USA.

  • Ku, H.-Y., Tseng, H. W., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2000). Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 616–657. https://doi.org/10.1086/318965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaning, M. (2015). A study of the use of games and gamification to enhance student engagement, experience and achievement on a theory-based course of an undergraduate media degree. Journal of Media Practice, 16(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2015.1041807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, C., Dong, Z., Untch, R. H., & Chasteen, M. (2013). Engaging computer science students through gamification in an online social network based collaborative learning environment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijiet.2013.v3.237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marti-Parreño, J., Méndez-Ibáñez, E., & Alonso-Arroyo, A. (2016). The use of gamification in education: A bibliometric and text mining analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moccozet, L., Tardy, C., Opprecht, W., & Leonard, M. (2013). Gamification-based assessment of group work. In Proceedings of the 16thInternational Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL) (pp. 171–179). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICL.2013.6644565.

  • Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In Proc. 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, Vol. 1, 323–329.

  • Neeli, B. K. (2012). A method to engage employees using gamification in BPO Industry. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Services in Emerging Markets (pp. 142–146). IEEE.

  • Nicholson, S. (2012). A user-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. In C. Martin (Ed.), Proceedings of the games+learning+society 8.0 (pp. 223–230). Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 1–20). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, J. S., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., & Klevers, M. (2017). Fostering development of work competencies and motivation via gamification. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Competence-based vocational and professional education. Technical and vocational education and training: Issues, concerns and prospects (pp. 795–818). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2002). Organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaborn, K., & Deborah, I. F. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. H. (1995). Problems with collaborative learning. Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), 306–308. https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-43.4.306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353.

  • Su, C.-H., & Cheng, C.-H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, F., & Helms, N. H. (2017). Creating evaluation profiles for games designed to be fun: An interpretive framework for serious game mechanics. Simulation & Gaming, 48(5), 695–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878117709841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Philadelphia: Wharton Digital Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, I. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students’ attitudes toward lessons. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, T. K., Baydaş, Ö., & Kokoç, M. (2017). Grup çalışması ortamlarına karşı öğrenci tutumları ölçeğinin (GÇOÖT) Türkçeye uyarlanması. İlköğretim Online, 16(3). 1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2017.330241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design - implementing game mechanics in web and Mobile apps. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Education Faculty, Yildiz Technical University, 34220, Istanbul, Turkey

    Cigdem Uz Bilgin

  2. Education Faculty, Hakkari University, 30000, Hakkari, Turkey

    Abdulmenaf Gul

Authors
  1. Cigdem Uz Bilgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdulmenaf Gul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cigdem Uz Bilgin.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest on the development of this article.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uz Bilgin, C., Gul, A. Investigating the Effectiveness of Gamification on Group Cohesion, Attitude, and Academic Achievement in Collaborative Learning Environments. TechTrends 64, 124–136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00442-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00442-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation