(Re)Imagining an Undergraduate Integrating Technology with Teaching Course


The purpose of this article is to provide information from a research study that looked at the (re)imagining of a learning technologies course, Integrating Technology with Teaching (ITT). The course was (re)imagined to meet the needs of students who will be preservice and future teachers. Course design for the (re)imagined course was based on 1) current literature related to TPACK, ISTE Standards and current issues in classroom technology integration and 2) a design framework including ADDIE principles and blended learning. The study was conducted during Spring 2018 in a face-to-face (F2) version of the ITT course at a Southwestern university in the US. Evaluation and feedback were collected from twenty-two students who completed the course. In addition to providing study findings, the article concludes with recommendations for the next course iteration and faculty members interested in (re)imagining learning technology courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Baran, E., Chuang, H. H., & Thompson, A. (2011). TPACK: An emerging research and development tool for teacher educators. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 370–377.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner, A. M., & Brill, J. M. (2016). Investigating practices in teacher education that promote and inhibit technology integration transfer in early career teachers. TechTrends, 60(2), 136–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM.

  5. Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freire, P. (2009). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach with new commentary by Peter McLaren, Joe L. Kincheloe. Hachette UK.

  7. Frenzel, S. (2018). 4 proven ways to get teachers to use technology. Retrieved from https://www.eschoolnews.com/2018/04/05/4-proven-ways-get-teachers-use-technology/. Accessed 29 Nov 2018.

  8. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

  9. Gee, M. K., & Ullman, C. (1998). Teacher/ethnographer in the workplace: Approaches to staff development.

  10. Graziano, K. J., Foulger, T. S., Schmidt-Crawford, D. A., & Slykhuis, D. (2017). Technology integration and teacher preparation: The development of teacher educator technology competencies. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2336–2346). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  11. Hargrave, C. P., & Hsu, Y. S. (2000). Survey of instructional technology courses for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4, 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hodell, C. (2011). ISD from the ground up: A no-nonsense approach to instructional design. American Society for Training and Development.

  13. Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope (Vol. 36). New York, NY: Routledge.

  14. ISTE (2016). ISTE standards for students. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Retrieved May 10, 2018 from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students

  15. Katz, M. S., Noddings, N., & Strike, K. A. (1999). Justice and caring: The search for common ground in education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

  16. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for quality in qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mai, J. (2009). Ethnographic interviews - Interviewing and observing users. Retrieved May 12, 2018 from https://confluence.sakaiproject.org/display/UX/Ethnographic+Interviews+-+Interviewing+and+Observing+Users. Accessed 29 Nov 2018.

  19. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. In Revised and expanded from "Case study research in education". San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

  20. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Kereluik, K. (2009). Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends, 53(5), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Noddings, N. (1995). Teaching themes of care. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 675.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parra, J. (2016). Moving beyond MOOC mania: Lessons from a faculty-designed MOOC. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning (CIEE), 3(1), 173–204.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwartz, D. L., Tsang, J. M., & Blair, K. P. (2016). The ABCs of how we learn: 26 scientifically proven approaches, how they work and when to use them. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

  24. Trust, T. (2018). 2017 ISTE standards for educators: From teaching with technology to using technology to empower learners.

  25. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2017). Reimagining the role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. Washington, D.C.

  26. University of Michigan, School of Education. (2018). High-leverage practices. Teaching Works. Retrieved November 29, 2018 from http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices. Accessed 29 Nov 2018.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Parra.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. J. Parra is a member of the board of directors for Online Learning Consortium. C. Raynor, M.A. declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. A. Osanloo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. R.O. Guillaume declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Appendix 1: Course Map

Table 1 ITT Course map

Appendix 2: Authors’ Biographical Information

Dr. Julia Parra is an assistant professor at New Mexico State University in the College of Education. She is the director for NMSU’s Online Teaching and Learning Graduate Certificate Program and is the coordinator for the Learning Design & Technology programs. Dr. Parra’s teaching and research interests include the interactions between learning design, technology, innovation and culturally relevant teaching in the context of TPACK, online/blended learning, emerging technologies and social media. For more about Julia, see her website at http://juliaparra.com.

Carolyn Raynor, M.A., is a doctoral student at New Mexico State University concentrating in Learning Design and Technology and Online Teaching and Learning. She teaches courses in Sociology and Learning Design and Technology. Her research interests include society and technology, integrating technology into preservice teaching, addressing conceptual gaps, innovation, emerging technology and online/blended teaching and learning. Connect with Carolyn through LinkedIn (/in/carrietrussell) or by email at ctrussel@nmsu.edu.

Dr. Azadeh Osanloo, Ph.D., M.P.A., is currently an Associate Professor and the Stan Fulton Endowed Chair for the Improvement of Border and Rural Schools at New Mexico State University. Her research agenda focuses on issues of educational equity; educational leadership and policy; the philosophical foundations of education; diversity, multiculturalism and human rights; bullying interventions; and social justice. Her interconnected lines of inquiry are underscored by four co-edited books and over 30 publications which cover the topics of urban school leadership, diversity-based bullying interventions, student and parent perceptions of bullying and international and national social justice work. In addition, she works to increase marginalized student representation in the STEM fields via school-community garden projects with K-12 students in low-income/under-resourced areas. She is a 2015 recipient of the American Graduate Champion Award – an award bestowed by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Connect with Dr. Osanloo at azadeh@nmsu.edu.

Dr. Rene O. Guillaume is an Assistant Professor at New Mexico State University in the Department of Educational Leadership and Administration, where he teaches dynamic educational leaders for a diverse society to serve as catalysts in creating socially-just educational systems. His research interests include social justice issues in education; racial and ethnic identity development; and faculty teaching, life and culture. Connect with Dr. Guillaume at reneog@nmsu.edu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parra, J., Raynor, C., Osanloo, A. et al. (Re)Imagining an Undergraduate Integrating Technology with Teaching Course. TechTrends 63, 68–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0362-x

Download citation


  • Blended learning
  • Educational technology
  • Learning design
  • Preservice teachers