Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The Embedded Lesson Approach to Social Media Research: Researching Online Phenomena in an Authentic Offline Setting

Abstract

For American teenagers, social media participation has become a routine feature of everyday life, with ready access to their online networks via smartphones, tablets, and computers. Despite questions and concerns about its effects, relatively few educational researchers have qualitatively explored how students use social media. Complexities such as parental consent, unintended access to non-consented peers, and privacy rights may be deterrents to this research. In this paper, we describe our embedded lesson approach to studying teenagers’ social media use in a high school setting. We designed and delivered three consecutive lessons about social media to two classes. Embedded within these lessons were opportunities to collect data via surveys, focus groups, and observations, along with member checking as a form of quality assurance. This approach rapidly yielded a rich data set, while also giving students the opportunity to articulate and reflect on their social media activities and experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bagdy, L. M., Dennen, V. P., Rutledge, S. A., Rowlett, J. T., & Burnick, S. (2018). Teens and social media: A case study of high school students’ informal learning practices and trajectories. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217920.

  2. Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. 2006. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1394.

  3. Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Children and Youth Services Review, 41, 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001.

  4. boyd, d. m. (2007). Why youth ♥ social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. Mac Arthur Foundation series on digital media and learning: Youth, identity and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  5. boyd, d. m. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  6. Brady, G. (2017). 5 social media uses we must teach in schools. Retrieved from https://medium.com/digital-learning/5-social-media-uses-we-must-teach-in-schools-acd10f1626a3

  7. Choi, Y. H., & Bazarova, N. N. (2015). Self-disclosure characteristics and motivations in social media: Extending the functional model to multiple social network sites. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12053.

  8. Cicourel, A. V. (1982). Interviews, surveys, and the problem of ecological validity. The American Sociologist, 17(1), 11–20.

  9. Cicourel, A. V. (2007). A personal, retrospective view of ecological validity. Text & Talk, 27(5–6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.033.

  10. Dennen, V. P. (2014). Becoming a blogger: Trajectories, norms, and activities in a community of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.028.

  11. Dennen, V. P. (2015). Technology transience and learner data: Shifting notions of privacy in online learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 45–60.

  12. Dennen, V. P., & Burner, K. J. (2017). Identity, context collapse, and Facebook use in higher education: Putting presence and privacy at odds. Distance Education, 38(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1322453.

  13. Dennen, V. P., Rutledge, S. A., Bagdy, L. M., Rowlett, J. T., Burnick, S., & Joyce, S. (2017). Context collapse and student social media networks: Where life and high school collide. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097286.3097318.

  14. Dennen, V. P., Rutledge, S. A., Bagdy, L. M., Rowlett, J. T., & Burnick, S. (2018a). Avoiding drama: Student and teacher positioning within a school’s social media ecosystem. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217927.

  15. Dennen, V. P., Rutledge, S. A., Bagdy, L. M., Rowlett, J. T., Burnick, S., & Joyce, S. (2018b). Social networking sites, teen identity, and high schools: Unregulated social spaces in formal learning environments Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  16. Elm, M. S. (2009). How do various notions of privacy influence decisions in qualitative internet research. In A. M. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 69–87). Los Angeles: Sage.

  17. Georgalou, M. (2016). ‘I make the rules on my wall’: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook. Discourse & Communication, 10(1), 40–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315600304.

  18. Golder, S., Ahmed, S., Norman, G., & Booth, A. (2017). Attitudes toward the ethics of research using social media: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(6), e195. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7082.

  19. Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954.

  20. Halverson, R., & Shapiro, R. B. (2013). Technologies for education and technologies for learners. In D. Anagnostopoulos, S. A. Rutledge, & R. Jacobsen (Eds.), The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of american education (pp. 163–180). Boston: Harvard Education Press.

  21. Hemmi, A., Bayne, S., & Land, R. (2009). The appropriation and repurposing of social technologies in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00306.x.

  22. Hewson, C. (2017). Research design and tools for online research. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 57–75). London: SAGE.

  23. Hine, C. (2009). How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In A. N. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1–25). London: Sage Publications.

  24. Janetzko, D. (2017). Nonreaactive data collection online. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research (pp. 76–91). London: SAGE.

  25. Jelenchick, L. A., Eickhoff, J. C., & Moreno, M. A. (2013). "Facebook depression?" social networking site use and depression in older adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(1), 128–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.008.

  26. Josefsson, P., Hrastinski, S., Pargman, D., & Pargman, T. C. (2016). The student, the private and the professional role: Students’ social media use. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1583–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9403-7.

  27. Junco, R. (2012a). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004.

  28. Junco, R. (2012b). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026.

  29. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x.

  30. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage Publications.

  31. Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media and technology overview 2015: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf.

  32. Lieber, A. (2010). A virtual veibershul: Blogging and the blurring of public and private among orthodox Jewish women. College English, 72(6), 621–637.

  33. Mao, J. (2014). Social media for learning: A mixed methods study on high school students’ technology affordances and perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.002.

  34. Meyer, K. (2010). The role of disruptive technology in the future of higher education. Educause Quarterly, 33(1).

  35. Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0334.

  36. Orgad, S. (2005). From online to offline and back: Moving from online to offline relationships with research informants. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 51–65). Oxford: Berg.

  37. Orgad, S. (2009). How can researchers make sense of the issues involved in collecting and interpreting online and offline data? In A. M. Markham & N. K. Baym (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 33–53). Los Angeles: SAGE.

  38. Rosen, L. D., Mark Carrier, L., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.001.

  39. Rutledge, S. A., & Cannata, M. (2016). Identifying and understanding effective high school practices. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(6), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721716636876.

  40. Rutledge, S. A., Cohen-Vogel, L., Osborne-Lampkin, L. T., & Roberts, R. L. (2015). Understanding effective high schools: Evidence for personalization for academic and social emotional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1060–1092. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215602328.

  41. Scott, C. F., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Prince, M. A., Nochajski, T. H., & Collins, R. L. (2017). Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults' social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.05.026.

  42. Vitak, J., Blasiola, S., Patil, S., & Litt, E. (2015). Balancing audience and privacy tensions on social network sites: Strategies of highly engaged users. International Journal Of Communication, 9(20). Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3208/1382

  43. Yonker, L. M., Zan, S., Scirica, C. V., Jethwani, K., & Kinane, T. B. (2015). “Friending” teens: Systematic review of social media in adolescent and young adult health care. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3692.

  44. Zdravkova, K., Ivanovic´, M., & Putnik, Z. (2012). Experience of integrating web 2.0 technologies. Educational Technology Research & Development, 60, 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-011-9228-z.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Vanessa P. Dennen.

Ethics declarations

This study was not funded. This study was approved by the researchers’ Institutional Review Board, and all procedures involving human participants were in accordance with these ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Vanessa Dennen declares that she has no conflicts of interest. Stacey Rutledge declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dennen, V.P., Rutledge, S.A. The Embedded Lesson Approach to Social Media Research: Researching Online Phenomena in an Authentic Offline Setting. TechTrends 62, 483–491 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0315-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Embedded research
  • Social media
  • Students
  • Teachers
  • Research design