Video-Based Teaching Playgrounds: Designing Online Learning Opportunities to Foster Professional Noticing of Teaching Practices
In this article, we share design guidelines for the development and use of online, video-based teaching playgrounds, which provide opportunities for prospective teachers to engage in professional noticing of teaching practices. Through teaching playgrounds, we provide an instantiation of the Presence+Experience framework, which combines the Community of Inquiry model with Kolb’s experiential learning cycle. Teaching playgrounds offer a viable mechanism for instructors and designers to incorporate high touch learning experiences into high tech online teacher preparation courses. Using quantitative methods, we demonstrate the efficacy of online content methods courses incorporating teaching playgrounds. We address implications for the incorporation of online content methods courses in mathematics and science teacher education programs.
KeywordsMathematics teacher education Online learning Science teacher education Teacher preparation Teacher noticing
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Heather Lynn Johnson declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Joanna C. Dunlap declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Geeta Verma declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Evan McClintock declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Dennis J. DeBay declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Brandy Bourdeaux declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Blomberg, G., Renkl, A., Sherin, M. G., Borko, H., & Seidel, T. (2013). Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education. Journal for Educational Research Online, 5(1), 90.Google Scholar
- Collopy, R. M., & Arnold, J. M. (2009). To blend or not to blend: online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 85.Google Scholar
- Council of Independent Colleges. (2016). High-tech or high-touch? Online learning and independent higher education. Retrieved from http://www.cic.edu/Programs-and-Services/Programs/Documents/CICBrief5-OnlineLearning.pdf
- Draus, P. J., Curran, M. J., & Trempus, M. S. (2014). The influence of instructor-generated video content on student satisfaction with and engagement in asynchronous online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 240–254.Google Scholar
- Dunlap, J. C. (2006). The effect of enculturation on doctoral students’ self-efficacy through the development of and contributing to an online journal. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(2), 19–48.Google Scholar
- Dunlap, J. C., Verma, G., & Johnson, H. L. (2016). Presence+Experience: A framework for the purposeful design of presence in online courses. Tech Trends, 60(2), 145–151.Google Scholar
- Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105.Google Scholar
- Gibbons, J. D., & Chakraborti, S. (2011). Nonparametric statistical inference. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (pp. 977–979). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Hibbert, M. (2014). What makes online instructional video compelling? EDUCAUSE review online. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/4/what-makes-an-online-instructional-video-compelling
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles (pp. 227–247). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2010). From pixel on a screen to real person in your students' lives: Establishing social presence using digital storytelling. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 70–72.Google Scholar
- Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Moloney, J. F., Hickey, C. P., Bergin, A. L., Boccia, J., Polley, K., & Riley, J. E. (2010). Characteristics of successful local blended programs in the context of the Sloan-c pillars. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
- Sánchez, M. (2011). A review of research trends in mathematics teacher education. PNA, 5(4), 129–145.Google Scholar
- Sherin, M., Jacobs, V., & Philipp, R. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Shnaikat, K., & Ahmed, A. A. (2015). High-tech human-touch for online courses: rules and principles for humanizing your online course. European Scientific Journal, 11(16), 114–133.Google Scholar
- Sobel, D. M., Sands, D., & Dunlap, J. C. (2009). Teaching intricate content online: It can be done and done well. Action in Teacher Education, 30(4), 28–44.Google Scholar
- van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596.Google Scholar