Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Embracing Collaboration and Social Perspective Taking Using Interactive Tabletops

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a contemporary multicultural classroom in which students from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds learn together, it becomes necessary to embrace collaboration, social perspective-taking, and understanding of the other to help students comprehend classmates’ values and perspectives. Based on the already researched affordances of interactive tabletops in education, as well as promising empirical results from their limited application in multicultural settings, the authors present a case of practical and impactful technology research in a culturally diverse classroom. The study was conducted with 44 students as part of their formal, socio-emotional education course in a public school in Cyprus. The study presents evidence of perceived collaborative learning around the tabletop, as well as gains in social perspective-taking propensity from pre- to post-test, demonstrating a promising use of interactive tabletops and related technologies in the field of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basheri, M., Burd, L., Munro, M., & Baghaei, N. (2013). Collaborative learning skills in multi-touch tables for UML software esign. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(3), 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, A., Jensen, K. E., Kristensen, D. H., & Kjeldskov, J. (2017). Escaping the trough: Towards real-world impact of tabletop research. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 33(2), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1206764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buisine, S., Besacier, G., Aoussat, A., & Vernier, F. (2012). How do interactive tabletop systems influence collaboration? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carano, K. T., & Berson, M. J. (2007). Breaking stereotypes: Constructing geographic literacy and cultural awareness through technology. The Social Studies, 98(2), 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., Horn, M., Block, F., Phillips, B., Evans, E. M., Diamond, J., & Shen, C. (2015). “Whoa! We’re going deep in the trees!”: Patterns of collaboration around an interactive information visualization exhibit. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., Chernobilsky, E., & Beitzel, B. (2006). Cognitive transfer revisited: Can we exploit new media to solve old problems on a large scale? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9127-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340701845219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dottin, E., & Weiner, M. (2001). Enhancing effective thinking and problem solving for preservice teacher education candidates and inservice professionals. London: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggum, N. D., Eisenberg, N., Kao, K., Spinrad, T. L., Bolnick, R., Hofer, C., Kupfer, A. S., & Fabricius, W. V. (2011). Emotion understanding, theory of mind, and prosocial orientation: Relations over time in early childhood. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A., & Rick, J. (2014). Supporting learning with interactive surfaces and spaces. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 689–701). New York: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, K. M., & Smith, R. L. (2017). The effects of age, gender, and gender role ideology on adolescents’ social perspective-taking ability and tendency in friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(5), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516650942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, H. (2011). A Closer Look at Social Perspective Taking. Retrieved August 2017, from https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/11/10/closer-look-social-perspective-taking

  • Gehlbach, H. (2017). Learning to walk in another’s shoes. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(6), 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach, H., Brown, S. W., Ioannou, A., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Niv-Solomon, A., & Janik, L. (2008). Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 894–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S. E., Mercier, E., Burd, E., & Hatch, A. (2011). Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 515–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9131-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., & Hutchins, E. (2009). Opportunities and challenges for augmented environments: A distributed cognition perspective. Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments (pp. 237–259). London: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-84800-098-8_9

  • Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13, 590–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A., & Antoniou, C. (2016). Tabletops for peace: technology enhanced peacemaking in school contexts. Educational Technology and Society, 19(2), 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou A., & Antoniou C. (2017). Peacemaking affordances of shareable interfaces: A provocative essay on using technology for cocial change. Proceedings of HCII 2017.

  • Ioannou, A., Zaphiris, P., Loizides, F., & Vasiliou, C. (2013). Let’s talk about technology for peace: A systematic assessment of problem-based group collaboration around an interactive tabletop. Interacting with Computers, 27(2), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A., Brown, S. W., & Artino, A. R. (2015a). Wikis and forums for collaborative problem-based activity: a systematic comparison of learners’ interactions. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannou, A., Loizides, F., Vasiliou, C., Zaphiris, P., & Parmaxi, A. (2015b). Tabletop support for collaborative design: an initial evaluation of IdeaSpace. Educational Media International, 52(4), 296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabali, E. H. (2015). The effects of perspective-taking on perceptual learning. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 48, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCroy, C. W., & Krysik, J. (2007). Understanding and interpreting effect size measures. Social Work Research, 31(4), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. (Ed.). (2014). Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments (Vol. 135). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J., & Hoadley, C. M. (2006). Ugly in a world where you can choose to be beautiful: Teaching and learning about diversity via virtual worlds. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on learning sciences, 383–389.

  • Lee, J. J., & Hoadley, C. M. (2007). Leveraging identity to make learning fun: Possible selves and experiential learning in massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs). Innovate Journal of Online Education, 3(6), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linda, R., Strong, B., Foss, P., Yager, M., Gehlbach, H., & Metcal, K. (2009). Social Perspective Taking (technical report 1259). Arlington: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P., Hornecker, E., Morris, R., Dalton, N. S., & Rogers, Y. (2008). When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface. In: 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems (pp. 33–40). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TABLETOP.2008.4660181.

  • Nardi, B. A., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In J. P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83–110). London: MIT Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, A. M., O’Brien, E., Morris, M. R., & Winograd, T. (2006). SIDES. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW ‘06 (p. 1). New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180877.

  • Rector-Aranda, A., & Raider-Roth, M. (2015). “I finally felt like I had power”: Student agency and voice in an online and classroom-based role-play simulation. Research in Learning Technology, 23.

  • Rogers, Y., & Lindley, S. (2004). Collaborating around vertical and horizontal displays: Witch way is best. Interacting with Computers, 16, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh, A., Danish, J., Enyedy, N., & Lee, C. (2015). Assessing young Children’s cognition through multi-modal interviews. In: Lindwall, O., Häkkinen, P., Koschmann, T., Tchounikine, P., Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) conference 2015, volume 2. Gothenburg, Sweden: The International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from https://repository.isls.org/handle/1/471

  • Soland, J., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. M. (2013). Measuring 21st-century competencies: Guidance for educators. Los Angeles: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Koren, C., Rocchi, C., Eisikovits, Z., Goren-bar, D., Tomasinin, D., & Weiss, P. T. (2008). A co-located interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict. In: Chi ‘08, proceedings of the SIGGHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1583–1592). New York, New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357302.

  • Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(03), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., Dunning, D., & Nordgren, L. F. (2013). Changing places: A dual judgment model of empathy gaps in emotional perspective taking. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 117–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Eliadou, A. (2009). Conceptualizing the use of technology to foster peace via adventure learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, M. G., & Crooke, P. J. (2009). Social thinking: A training paradigm for professionals and treatment approach for individuals with social learning/social pragmatic challenges. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 16(2), 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, S., Taylor, P., & Kulski, M. (2006). Internationalising a learning environment instru-ment for evaluating transnational online university courses. Learning Environments Research, 9, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zancanaro, M., Stock, O., Eisikovits, Z., Koren, C., & Weiss, P. L. (2012). Co-narrating a conflict. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme through the NOTRE project (H2020-TWINN-2015, Grant Agreement Number: 692058) as well as funding from project (ΥΕ/ΥΑ/ΤΑΜΕ/02.2015-2016) awarded to the Limassol municipality and other local authorities in Cyprus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andri Ioannou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ioannou, A., Constantinou, V. Embracing Collaboration and Social Perspective Taking Using Interactive Tabletops. TechTrends 62, 403–411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0271-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0271-z

Keywords

Navigation