Skip to main content
Log in

Empathy in Distance Learning Design Practice

TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

The notion of designer empathy has become a cornerstone of design philosophy in fields such as product design, human-computer interaction, and service design. But the literature on instructional designer empathy and learner analysis suggests that distance learning designers are generally quite removed from the learners with whom they could be empathizing. We describe a qualitative study conducted with practicing distance learning designers across the United States. We selected designers in varying sectors within the workforce, and interviewed our participants via videoconferencing. Our inquiry uncovered important tensions designers live with regarding empathy in practice. Designers struggle to know how much learner analysis is sufficient, which of many stakeholders to empathize with, and navigating constraints. Future work in this area could help designers practice more empathically and, in doing so, improve the learning environments they create for learners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baek, E. O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., & Frick, T. (2008). User-centered design and development. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 1, 660–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, B., & Levin, D. (2012). The softer side of innovation: The people. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 364–366. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00910.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(3), 381–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Button, G. (2000). The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Issues, 21(4), 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carolozzi, A. F., Bull, K. S., Eells, G. T., & Hurlburt, J. D. (1995). Empathy as related to creativity, dogmatism, and expressiveness. The Journal of Psychology, 129(4), 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y., Lim, Y., & Stolterman, E. (2008). Personas: From theory to practices. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction, Lund.

  • Cooper, B. (2010). In search of profound empathy in learning relationships: Understanding the mathematics of moral learning environments. Journal of Moral Education, 39(1), 79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B. (2011). Empathy in education: Engagement, values, and achievement. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation: Creating new thinking by design. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, V., Gaidys, U., & Robb, Y. (2003). Hermeneutic research in nursing: Developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry, 10(2), 113–120 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12755860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorry, G. A., & Westbrook, R. A. (2011). Once more, with feeling: Empathy and technology in customer care. Business Horizons, 54(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. M. (2015). Critiquing the role of the learner and context in aesthetic learning experiences. In B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. W. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience: Creating the future of educational technology (pp. 199–213). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, B. D., Mehta, R., Mishra, P., Holmes, S., Arthur, S., Coyle, C., & Root-Bernstein, R. (2015). Embodied thinking as a trans-disciplinary habit of the mind. TechTrends, 58(1), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herd, K. B., & Mehta, R. (2013). Heart versus head: Examining differential effects of empathy versus perspective taking on creative product design. NA-Advances in Consumer Research, 41.

  • Köppen, E., & Meinel, C. (2014). Empathy via design thinking: Creation of sense and knowledge. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research: Building innovators (pp. 15–28). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, I., & Battarbee, K. (2003). Introduction to user experience and empathic design. In K. Koskinen, K. Batterbee, & T. Mattelmäki (Eds.), Empathic design: User experience in product design. Helsinki: IT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyshon, C. (2012, September 16). This week in fiction: Mohsin Hamid. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1990). The origins and development of empathy. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neukrug, E., & Bayne, H. (2013). Creative and novel approaches to empathy: A neo-Rogerian perspective. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 35, 29–42 http://amhca.metapress.com/index/5Q375220327000T2.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osguthorpe, R. T., Osguthorpe, R. D., Jacob, W. J., & Davies, R. S. (2003). The moral dimensions of instructional design. Educational Technology, 43(2), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. (1985). Hermeneutic inquiry in the study of human conduct. American Psychologist, 40, 1081–1093. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.10.1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, P. (2006). Design as storytelling. TechTrends, 50(4), 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pole, C., & Morrison, M. (2003). Doing ethnography: Researching first-hand experience. In Ethnology for education (pp. 17–46). Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapanta, C., & Cantoni, L. (2013). Being in the users' shoes: Anticipating experience while designing online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(5), 765–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. C., Graham, C. R., & Mayes, C. T. (2007). Cultural competence and instructional design: Exploration research into the delivery of online instruction cross-culturally. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, E., & Tingley, K. (2008). Science and math teachers as instructional designers: Linking ID to the ethic of caring. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 34(1).

  • Segelström, F., & Holmlid, S. (2015). Ethnography by design: On goals and mediating artefacts. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(2), 134–149. doi:10.1177/1474022214560159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, S. W. (2012). Research-based personas: Teaching empathy in professional education. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 12(3), 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. S. (2016). Empathy and the instructional designer, Unpublished master’s thesis. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wöllner, C. (2012). Is empathy related to the perception of emotional expression in music? A multimodal time-series analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 214–223. doi:10.1037/a0027392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & McCarthy, J. (2008). Empathy and experience in HCI. Chicago: Paper presented at the Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yanchar, S. C., & Hawkley, M. (2014). “There’s got to be a better way to do this:” a qualitative investigation of informal learning among instructional designers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Matthews.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There was no grant funding supporting this research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthews, M.T., Williams, G.S., Yanchar, S.C. et al. Empathy in Distance Learning Design Practice. TechTrends 61, 486–493 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0212-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0212-2

Keywords

Navigation