Three Cases of Hashtags Used as Learning and Professional Development Environments
Hashtags offer exciting opportunities for professional development, teaching, and learning. However, their use reflects users’ needs and desires. To illustrate and problematize the ways hashtags are used in professional development settings, this study reports on users’ participation patterns, users’ roles, and content contributed to three unique hashtags. This mixed methods research employs data mining techniques to retrieve data. Using a collective case study methodology, the study compares and contrasts the use of three hashtags and offers insights into the use of hashtags as emerging learning and professional development environments. Results show that hashtags exhibit similarities, such as unequal user participation. Findings also reveal differences between hashtags. For instance some hashtags are used on an ongoing basis while others have well-defined start and end dates. Ultimately, these results question deterministic thinking with respect to emerging technologies and novel professional development environments.
KeywordsSocial Media Hashtag Professional development Collective case study Social media participation Emerging technologies
- Cooper, T. (2014). Educator learning 2.0: exploring educators’ use of twitter to support professional learning (Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary).Google Scholar
- Couros, A., & Hildebrandt, K. (2016). Designing for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning (pp. 147–165). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology 1980–2000. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Forte, A., Humphreys, M., & Park, T. (2012). Grassroots professional development: How teachers use Twitter. Proceedings of the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 106–113). Retrieved from http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM12/paper/download/4585/4973.
- Gao, F., & Li, L. (2016). Examining a one-hour synchronous chat in a microblogging-based professional development community. British Journal of Educational Technology.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Greenhow, C. (2011). Learning and social media: What are the interesting questions for research? International Journal of Cyber Behavior. Psychology and Learning, 1(1), 36–50.Google Scholar
- Junco, R. (2014). Engaging students through social media: evidence based practices for use in student affairs. San Francisco: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Kimmons, R. & Veletsianos, G. (2016). Education scholars’ evolving uses of twitter as a conference backchannel and social commentary platform. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(3), 445–464.Google Scholar
- Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Kang, J., Harron, J., & Liu, S. (2016). Examining the Use of Facebook and Twitter as an Additional Social Space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 14–26.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. (2006). Participation inequality: Encouraging more users to contribute. Retrieved on Apr 27, 2016 from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/.
- Olmstead, K., Lampe, C. & Ellison, N. B. (2016). Social media and the workplace. Pew Research Center. Retrieved on June 24, 2016 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/06/22/social-media-and-the-workplace/.
- Rutherford, C. (2013). Facebook as a source of informal teacher professional development. In Education, 16(1), 60–74.Google Scholar
- Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- TAGS (n.d.). Twitter Archiving Google Sheet. Retrieved on May 20, 2016 from https://tags.hawksey.info/
- Trinkle, C. (2009). Twitter as a professional learning community. School Library Monthly, 26(4), 22–23.Google Scholar
- Twitter API (n.d.). API overview. Twitter Developers. Retrieved from https://dev.twitter.com/overview/api.Google Scholar
- Veletsianos, G. (2016). Digital Learning Environments, In Rushby, N. & Surry D. (Eds) Handbook of Learning Technologies (pp. 242–260). Wiley.Google Scholar
- Veletsianos, G. (in press). Toward a generalizable understanding of twitter and social media use across MOOCs: who participates on MOOC hashtags and in what ways? Journal of Computing in Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Whitworth, A., & Benson, A. D. (2010). Learning, design and emergence: Two case studies of Moodle in distance education. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 195–213). Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Zheng, S., Han, K., Rosson, M.B., & Carroll, J.M. (2016). The role of social media in MOOCs: How to use social media to enhance student retention. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, 419–428.Google Scholar