Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 61, Issue 3, pp 246–252 | Cite as

Enriching Professional Learning Networks: A Framework for Identification, Reflection, and Intention

  • Daniel G. KrutkaEmail author
  • Jeffrey Paul Carpenter
  • Torrey Trust
Original Paper

Abstract

Many educators in the 21st century utilize social media platforms to enrich professional learning networks (PLNs). PLNs are uniquely personalized networks that can support participatory and continuous learning. Social media services can mediate professional engagements with a wide variety of people, spaces and tools that might not otherwise be available. Teachers who once might have had access to only a handful of colleagues can now employ Facebook, Twitter and other mediums to learn from peers across the globe at any time. However, educators face numerous challenges building and enhancing their PLNs for professional growth. To support educators in the development of their PLNs, we present a framework for PLN enrichment. Rooted in our research and experiences with PLNs, this flexible framework is designed to help educators reflect upon how they might continuously improve their PLN experiences and outcomes.

Keywords

Professional learning networks Social media Professional development Participatory media Teacher education 

References

  1. Berry, B. (2015). The dynamic duo of professional learning = collaboration and technology. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(4), 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X033008003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boston Consulting Group. (2014). Teachers know best: Teachers’ views on professional development. Retrieved from: http://collegeready.gatesfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Gates-PDMarketResearch-Dec5.pdf.
  4. Carpenter, J. P. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ micro-blogging: professional development via Twitter. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(2), 209–234.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2014). How and why educators use Twitter: a survey of the field. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 414–434. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2014.925701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, J. P., & Krutka, D. G. (2015). Engagement through microblogging: educator professional development via Twitter. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 707–728. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.939294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter, J. P., & Linton, J. N. (2016). Edcamp unconferences: Educators’ perspectives on an untraditional professional learning experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the U.S. & abroad (technical report). Oxford, OH: Learning Forward; Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.Google Scholar
  9. Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08331140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Boston, MA: Heath & Co.Google Scholar
  11. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hur, J. W., & Brush, T. A. (2009). Teacher participation in online communities: Why do teachers want to participate in self-generated online communities of K-12 teachers? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(3), 279–303. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robinson, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45–60. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00047-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelly, N., & Antonio, A. (2016). Teacher peer support in social network sites. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Advance online publication. Review of Educational Research. doi: 10.3102/0034654315626800.Google Scholar
  17. Langer, E. J. (2016). The power of mindful learning. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: a sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Matzat, U. (2013). Do blended virtual learning communities enhance teachers’ professional development more than purely virtual ones? A large scale empirical comparison. Computers & Education, 60(1), 40–51. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rentner, D. S., Kober, N., & Frizzel, M. (2016). Listen to us: Teacher views and voices [report]. Center for Education Progress. Retrieved from http://www.cep-dc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=1456#sthash.ULhb9iBQ.dpuf.
  21. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Seo, K., & Han, Y. K. (2013). Oteanline cher collaboration: A case study of voluntary collaboration in a teacher-created online community. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 10(2).Google Scholar
  23. Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
  24. Timperley, H., & Alton-Lee, A. (2008). Reframing teacher professional learning: an alternative policy approach to strengthening valued outcomes for diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 328–369. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07308968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 133–138. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trust, T. (2013). Beyond school walls: teachers’ use of professional learning networks to receive help on a global scale. International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments, 1(3), 270–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: professional learning networks for whole teachers. Computers & Education, 102(1), 15–34. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van den Bergh, L., Ros, A., & Beijaard, D. (2014). Improving teacher feedback during active learning effects of a professional development program. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 772–809. doi: 10.3102/0002831214531322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Visser, R. D., Evering, L. C., & Barrett, D. E. (2014). #TwitterforTeachers: the implications of twitter as a self-directed professional development tool for K–12 teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 396–413. doi: 10.1080/15391523.2014.925694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel G. Krutka
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeffrey Paul Carpenter
    • 2
  • Torrey Trust
    • 3
  1. 1.Teacher EducationTexas Woman’s UniversityDentonUSA
  2. 2.Elon UniversityElonUSA
  3. 3.Teacher Education & Curriculum StudiesUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations