TechTrends 2010–2015: A Content Analysis


This study is a content analysis of articles published within the journal TechTrends from 2000 to 2015. The study reveals that the publication TechTrends has increased the overall number of peer reviewed original papers over the last 6 years. The author describes the proportion of these original papers per volume and analyzes the content of these papers by author, author-provided key words, EBSCOHost assigned subject words, research method, and number of citations as reported by Google Scholar. The most frequent method of research within the 229 original articles is theoretical research and the most common keywords include learning, technology, and education. Content analysis was found to be the least frequently used research method and there has been only one original paper that has focused on corporate environments and no articles that have concentrated on military training within the 6 year period. The two most frequently sited articles focused on the use of iPads.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1


  1. About this journal. (2015). Retrieved December 4, 2015, from

  2. Brown, A., & Boling, E. (2011). Editor’s notes. TechTrends, 55(1), 2–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. EBSCO Support: What are Major Subject Headings and Minor Subject Headings? (2015). Retrieved December 16, 2015, from

  4. Fine, B. (2012). A corporate partnership to enhance teacher training. TechTrends, 56(6), 27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, L. S. (Ed.). (2015). School media and technology [Special edition]. TechTrends, 59(3).

  6. Green, T., & Donovan, L. (Eds.). (2013). California State University at Fullerton [Special issue]. TechTrends, 57(6).

  7. Kowch, E. W. (Ed.). (2013). Leadership [Special issue]. TechTrends, 57(5).

  8. Kumar, S., & Antonenko, P. D. (Eds.). (2014). Hybrid and online doctoral programs in educational technology [Special issue]. TechTrends, 58(4).

  9. Land, S. M., & Zimmerman, H. T. (Eds.). (2014). Augmented reality and mobile learning [Special issue]. TechTrends, 58(1).

  10. Luterbach, K. (Ed.). (2012). East Carolina University [Spotlight issue]. TechTrends, 56(6).

  11. McClanahan, B., Williams, K., Kennedy, E., & Tate, S. (2012). A breakthrough for josh: How use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends, 56(3), 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mishra, P., Terry, L., & Henriksen, D. (Eds.). (2013). Michigan State University [Spotlight issue]. TechTrends, 57(3).

  13. Murray, O. T., & Olcese, N. R. (2011). Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or Not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42–48. 10.1007/s11528-011-0540-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ross, J., & Bayne, S. (Eds.). (2015). University of Scotland, Ediburgh [Spotlight issue]. TechTrends, 59(1).

  15. Rourke, L., & Szabo, M. (2002). A content analysis of the journal of distance education 1986–2001. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 63–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. West, R. E. (2010). A Student’s guide to strengthening an online community. TechTrends, 54(5), 69–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. West, R. E. (2014). Communities of innovation: individual, group, and organizational characteristics leading to greater potential for innovation. TechTrends, 58(5), 53–61. 10.1007/s11528-014-0786-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Young, E. H., Griffiths, T., Luke, B., & West, R. E. (2014). Educational technology research journals: journal of distance education, 2003–2012. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 54(5), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Stauffer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stauffer, E. TechTrends 2010–2015: A Content Analysis. TechTrends 61, 147–154 (2017).

Download citation


  • TechTrends 2010–2015
  • Research trends
  • Content analysis