TechTrends

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 65–70 | Cite as

Employee Perspectives on MOOCs for Workplace Learning

Original Paper

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) can be considered a rather novel method in digital workplace learning, and there is as yet little empirical evidence on the acceptance and effectiveness of MOOCs in professional learning. In addition to existing findings on employers’ attitudes, this study seeks to investigate the employee perspective towards MOOCs in professional contexts and to further explore the acceptance of MOOCs for workplace learning. In a survey study, N = 119 employees from a wide range of enterprises were questioned with regard to motivation, credentials, and incentives related to participation in MOOCs. Findings indicate a high importance of on-the-job and career development learning purposes as well as a general interest in MOOC topics. Credentials are deemed necessary, yet their acceptance among the relevant stakeholders is considered rather low. Implications for design and implementation of MOOCs in digital workplace learning and for further research are discussed.

Keywords

MOOC Workplace learning Vocational education Professional learning Employee 

References

  1. Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Bilkstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220. doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookshire, R. G., Lybarger, K. M., & Keane, L. B. (2011). Virtual workplace learning: Promises met? In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. O’Connor (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of workplace learning (pp. 331–340). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castaño Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., & Punie, Y. (2016). Influence of employer support for professional development on MOOCs enrolment and completion: Results from a cross-course survey. In M. Khalil, M. Ebner, M. Kopp, A. Lorenz, & M. Kalz (Eds.), Proceedings of the EUROPEAN STAKEHOLDER SUMMIT on experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs - EMOOOCS 2016 (pp. 251–263). Graz: University of Graz.Google Scholar
  4. Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1996). The expert Lerner: strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischer, G. (2014). Beyond hype and underestimation: identifying research challenges for the future of MOOCs. Distance Education Journal, 35(2), 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Learning analytics. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 447–451). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Udacity. In S. Danver (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of online education (pp. 1149–1151). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Ifenthaler, D., & Widanapathirana, C. (2014). Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: two case studies using support vector machines. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 221–240. doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D.-K. (2015). Internet: Its impact and its potential for learning and instruction. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (Vol. 1, pp. 416–422). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Ifenthaler, D., Bellin-Mularski, N., & Mah, D.-K. (Eds.). (2016). Foundations of digital badges and micro-credentials. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Jovanovic, J., & Devedzic, V. (2015). Open badges: novel means to motivate, scaffold and recognize learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(1), 115–119. doi:10.1007/s10758-014-9232-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kalz, M. (2015). Lifelong learning and its support with new technologies. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 14, pp. 93–99). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lehmann, T., Haehnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, N., Kidziński, Ł., Jermann, P., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). MOOC video interaction patterns: What do they tell us? In G. Conole, T. Klobučar, C. Rensing, J. Konert, & É. Lavoué (Eds.), Design for teaching and learning in a networked world (Vol. 9307, pp. 197–210). Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2014). Technology-enhanced professional learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 1187–1212). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Mah, D.-K. (2016). Learning analytics and digital badges: potential impact on student retention in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(3), 285–305. doi:10.1007/s10758-016-9286-8.
  18. Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 197–213.Google Scholar
  19. Noe, R. A., Clarke, A. D. M., & Klein, H. J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olsson, U. (2016). Open courses and MOOCs as professional development – is the openness a hindrance? Education and Training, 58(2), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pardos, Z. A., Whyte, A., & Kao, K. (2016). moocRP: an open learning analytics platform. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Radford, A. W., Robles, J., Cataylo, S., Horn, L., Thornton, J., & Whitfield, K. (2014). The employer potential of MOOCs: a mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seel, N. M., Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2013). Mental models and their role in learning by insight and creative problem solving. In J. M. Spector, B. B. Lockee, S. E. Smaldino, & M. Herring (Eds.), Learning, problem solving, and mind tools: Essays in honor of David H. Jonassen (pp. 10–34). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Tu, C.-H., & Sujo-Montes, L. E. (2015). MOOCs. In R. Papa (Ed.), Media rich instruction (pp. 287–304). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning in the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3, 130–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tynjälä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Hämäläinen, R. (2014). TEL@work – towards integration of theory and practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 990–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. White, B. (2014). Is “MOOC-Mania” over? In S. S. Cheung, J. Fong, J. Zhang, R. Kwan, & L. Kwok (Eds.), Hybrid learning. Theory and practice (Vol. 8595, pp. 11–15). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning, Design and TechnologyUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  2. 2.Curtin UniversityBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations