Building a Better Mousetrap: How Design-Based Research was Used to Improve Homemade PowerPoint Games
This paper is a review of a three-cycle, design-based research study that explored the relationship between the pedagogical research and the actual implementation of a game design project using Microsoft PowerPoint. Much of the initial literature on using homemade PowerPoint games showed no significant improvement in test scores when students created these low-tech games, despite the fact that the game project was grounded in sound pedagogical strategies. After each iteration changes were made to better reflect the recommendations from the literature, and at the end of the study, students creating games were performing statistically higher on tests than their counterparts who did not create games. Limitations of the study are discussed, as well as ideas for future research in the area of student-generated games as an instructional approach.
KeywordsGaming Homemade PowerPoint games Design research Design-based research
- American Chemical Society. (2008). Chemistry in the Community (ChemCom): Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from http://portal.acs.org/portal/acs/corg/content?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=PP_ARTICLEMAIN&node_id=557&content_id=CTP_005518&use_sec=true&sec_url_var=region1&__uuid.
- Barbour, M. K., Thomas, G., Rauscher, D., & Rieber, L. (2010). Homemade PowerPoint games. In A. Hirumi (Ed.), Playing games in schools (pp. 333–347). Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
- Barbour, M. K., Clesson, K., & Adams, M. (2011a). Game design as an educational pedagogy. Illinois English Bulletin, 98(3), 7–28.Google Scholar
- Barbour, M. K., Kinsella, J., & Rieber, L. (2011b). Secondary students, laptops and game design: Examining the potential of homemade PowerPoint games in a blended learning environment. Georgia Social Studies Journal, 1(2), 31–44.Google Scholar
- Collins, M. A. J. (2000). Do microthemes improve student learning of biology. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association National Convention, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y., Peppler, K. A., & Chiu, G. M. (2007). High tech programmers in low-income communities: Creating a computer culture in a community technology center. In C. Steinfield, B. T. Pentland, M. Ackerman, & N. Contractor (Eds.), Communities and technologies 2007 (pp. 545–563). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kenny, R., & Gunter, G. (2011). Factors affecting adoption of video games in the classroom. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 22(2), 259–276.Google Scholar
- Lotherington, H., & Ronda, N. S. (2010). Gaming geography: Educational games and literacy development in the Grade 4 classroom. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 35(3).Google Scholar
- Maloney, J. H., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., Rusk, N. (2008). Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
- Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Parker, J. S. (2004). Evaluating the impact of project based learning by using student created PowerPoint games in the seventh grade language arts classroom. Instructional Technology Monographs, 1. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/itm/archives/fall2004/JPARKER.HTM.
- Prensky, M. (2010). Educating the millennial generation. In A. Hirumi (Ed.), Playing games in school (pp. 7–32). Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
- Ritzhaupt, A., Poling, N., Frey, C., & Johnson, M. (2014). A synthesis on digital games in education: what the research literature says from 2000 to 2010. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(2), 261–280.Google Scholar
- Rodger, S. H., Bashford, M., Dyck, L., Hayes, J., Liang, L., Nelson, D., Qin, H. (2010). Enhancing K-12 education with alice programming adventures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifteenth annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Bilkent, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
- Sheridan, K., Clark, K. C., Peters, E. (2009). How scientific inquiry emerges from game design. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2009, Charleston, SC, USA. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/30835.
- Siko, J. P. (2013). Is it the intervention or just the students themselves? The influence of a game design project on student performance. EdTechnology Ideas, 1(2). Retrieved from http://edtechnologyideas.com/education-technology-journal-issue-2/
- Siko, J.P., & Barbour, M.K. (2013). Game design and homemade PowerPoint games: an examination of the justifications and a review of the research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22(1), 335–362.Google Scholar
- Siko, J. P., & Barbour, M. K. (2014). Design research using game design as an instructional strategy. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 427–448.Google Scholar
- Siko, J. P., & Barbour, M. K. (2015). The sum is greater than the parts: deconstructing homemade PowerPoint games. Computers in the Schools, 32(3/4), 167–182.Google Scholar
- Siko, J., Barbour, M. K., & Toker, S. (2011). Beyond Jeopardy and lectures: using Microsoft Power Point as a game tool to teach science. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(3), 303–320.Google Scholar
- Yu, F. Y., & Pan, K. J. (2014). The effects of student question-generation with online prompts on learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(3), 267–279.Google Scholar