Exploring the Use of Interactive Digital Storytelling Video: Promoting Student Engagement and Learning in a University Hybrid Course
- 886 Downloads
This study explores interactive digital storytelling in a university hybrid course. Digital stories leverage imagery and narrative-based content to explore concepts, while appealing to millennials. When digital storytelling is used as the main source of course content, tensions arise regarding how to engage and support student learning while holding them accountable for watching the video. We explore interactive video as a way to mitigate and engage with these issues. The context is a hybrid sustainability course for preservice teachers that used digital stories in a conventional format in which students could start, stop, and pause the video at will, as well as an interactive format with all the same features, plus programmed pauses for required understanding checks. A survey of students (n = 223) indicated they believed interactive digital stories supported engagement, scaffolded learning, and increased learning gains, but did not increase accountability. Evaluation of quiz performance indicated they recalled significantly more with interactive videos, compared to conventional videos. Implications for practice are discussed.
KeywordsDigital storytelling Higher education Hybrid Interactive video Student engagement Sustainability education
The authors and the research development team at the Biodesign Institute thank Arizona State University (ASU) for the generous Strategic Initiative Funds (SIF) provided to form the Sustainability Science Education Project, to develop the Sustainability Science for Teachers course, and other related projects at ASU. The Project was developed under the leadership of Dr. Lee Hartwell. We thank the Center for Sustainable Health at the Biodesign Institute, the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, the School of Sustainability, and the Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes located at Arizona State University for advice and many experienced students who helped with the project. A special heartfelt thank you to all current and past Sustainability Science Education Project team members, colleagues, instructors, students, participants, and friends.
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf.
- Burmark, L. (2004). Visual presentations that prompt, flash & transform here are some great ways to have more visually interesting class sessions. Media and Methods, 40, 4–5.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge: Academic Press. Retrieved 10 January 2016, from http://www.myilibrary.com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu?ID=493929Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Foley, R. W., Archambault, L. M., Warren, A. E. (2015). Building Sustainability Literacy Among Preservice Teachers: An Initial Evaluation of a Sustainability Course Designed for K-8 Educators. In Educating Science Teachers for Sustainability (pp. 49-67). New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
- Fowler, J. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hannafin, M. J. (1985). Empirical issues in the study of computer-assisted interactive video. Educational Communication and Technology, 33(4), 235–247.Google Scholar
- Hibbing, A. N., & Rakin-Erikson, J. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: using visual images to improve comprehension in middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56(8), 758–770.Google Scholar
- Hung, C.-M., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, I. (2012). A project-based digital storytelling approach for improving students’ learning motivation, problem-solving competence and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 368–379.Google Scholar
- Kajder, S., & Swenson, J. (2004). Digital images in the language arts classroom. Learning and Leading with Technology, 31(8), 18–22.Google Scholar
- Lambert, J. (2013). Digital storytelling: Capturing lives, creating community (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. Learning with print: the role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21, 687–704.Google Scholar
- Project Tomorrow (2015). Flipped learning report. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/2015_FlippedLearningReport.html.
- Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: from new media to communication. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science, 16, 110–134.Google Scholar
- Robin, B. R. (2006). The educational uses of digital story telling. Society for information technology and teacher education conference, Orlando Florida. 978-1-8800094-58-7. Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.), The Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Schwan, S. & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293–305.Google Scholar
- Turrión, C. (2014). Multimedia book apps in a contemporary culture: commerce and innovation, continuity and rupture. BLFT-Nordic Journal of ChildLit Aesthetics, 5. doi: 10.3402/blft.v5.24426.
- Warren, A. E., Archambault, L. M., & Foley, R. W. (2014). Sustainability education framework for teachers: developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking. Journal of Sustainability Education, 6, 1–14.Google Scholar