Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 344–349 | Cite as

A Framework for Open Textbooks Analytics System

  • Deepak PrasadEmail author
  • Rajneel Totaram
  • Tsuyoshi Usagawa
Original Paper

Abstract

In the last few years, open textbook development has picked up dramatically due both to the expense of commercially published textbooks and the increasing availability of high-quality OER alternatives. While this offers a tremendous benefit in terms of lowering student textbook costs, the question remains, to what extent (if any) do open textbooks influence the amount and method in which students engage with their open textbooks. The answers to these questions should provide useful new insights for all involved in open textbooks and aid in their continued development and propagation. Despite seeming difficulty in gathering data to answer these questions, the digital nature of open textbooks, makes it possible to enable a learning analytics system for open textbooks to track how exactly students are interacting with their open textbooks. To date learning analytics for open textbooks has received relatively little attention. To this end, this paper proposes a framework that can act as a useful guide for setting up learning analytics system for open textbooks also applicable to other digital textbooks. The paper concludes by outlining directions for future work.

Keywords

Data synchronization EPUB Learning analytics Offline access Online access Textbook analytics Web-based EPUB reader 

References

  1. Adobe Systems Incorporated. (2014). Adobe digital publishing suite and ePub3. Retrieved from http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/devnet/digitalpublishingsuite/pdfs/DPS_and_ePub_FAQ.pdf.
  2. Baker, R., & Siemens, G. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 253–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker, J., Thierstein, J., Fletcher, K., Kaur, M., & Emmons, J. (2009). Open textbook proof-of-concept via connexions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/633/1387
  4. Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3972/3383.
  5. Brown, M. (2011). Learning analytics: The coming third wave (pp. 1–4). Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELIB1101.pdf.
  6. Campbell, J. P., & Oblinger, D. G. (2007). Academic Analytics. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/PUB6101.pdf.
  7. Cavanaugh, T. (2002). Ebooks and accommodations: is this the future of print accommodation? Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(2), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chatti, M. A., Dyckhoff, A. L., Schroeder, U., & Thüs, H. (2012). A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 318–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clow, D. (2012). The learning analytics cycle: Closing the loop effectively. In LAK12: 2nd international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 134–137). Vancouver.Google Scholar
  10. Clow, D. (2013). An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(6), 683–695. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daniel, B. (2014). Big data and analytics in higher education: opportunities and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12230.Google Scholar
  12. Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (LAK ‘14) (pp. 231–240). Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  13. Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58–76.Google Scholar
  14. Feldstein, A., Martin, M., Hudson, A., Warren, K., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2012). Open textbooks and increased student access and outcomes. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: a generic framework for learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 42–57.Google Scholar
  16. Haythornthwaite, C., de Laat, M., & Dawson, S. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on learning analytics. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1371–1379. doi: 10.1177/0002764213498850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. (2011). Open-access textbooks and financial sustainability: a case study on Flat World Knowledge. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/960/1860.
  18. Hilton, J., Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1523/2652.
  19. Kallenborn, M. (2014). Learning analytics whitepaper (pp. 1–32). Retrieved from http://www.im-c.de/en/products/imc/software-solutions/learning-suite/whitepaper-learning-analytics/.
  20. Larusson, J. A., & White, B. (2014). Introduction. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 1–12). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Okamoto, K. (2013). Making higher education more affordable, one course reading at a time: academic libraries as key advocates for open access textbooks and educational resources. Public Services Quarterly, 9(4), 267–283. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2013.842397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Detzner, C. M., Walling, J., & Weiss, S. (2011). Open textbook adoption and use: implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2011.538563.Google Scholar
  23. Prasad, D., & Usagawa, T. (2014). Towards development of OER derived custom-built open textbooks: A baseline survey of university teachers at the University of the South Pacific. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4).Google Scholar
  24. Ream, D. K. (2012). Anatomy of an EPUB e-book. Key Words, 20(3), 85–106.Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, T. J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. (2014). The impact of open textbooks on secondary science learning outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899. doi: 10.1177/0038038507080443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Senack, E. (2014). Fixing the broken textbook market: How students respond to high textbook costs and demand alternatives. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.washpirg.org/sites/pirg/files/reports/1.27.14FixingBrokenTextbooksReport.pdf
  28. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: the emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–40.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepak Prasad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajneel Totaram
    • 1
  • Tsuyoshi Usagawa
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of the South PacificSuvaFiji
  2. 2.Kumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations