, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 98–101 | Cite as

What’s Cooking in the MOOC Kitchen: Layered MOOCs

  • Matt CrosslinEmail author
  • Jenny S. Wakefield
Column: Graduate Member Musings


During several panel presentations at the AECT Annual Convention in Indianapolis in November 2015, concerns with MOOCs were raised. In this paper the authors discuss a few of those concerns of extra interest, and explain the relatively new customizable dual-layer MOOC course design. This new paradigm of MOOC design holds promise to alleviate some of the concerns with open global MOOCs.


MOOC Open education Instructional design Dual-layer course design 


  1. Abas, Z. W. (2015). The glocalization of MOOCs in southeast Asia. In Bonk, Lee, Reeves, & Reynolds (Ed.), MOOCs and open education: Around the world (pp. 232–242). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56–71.Google Scholar
  3. Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reynolds, T. H., & Reeves, T. C. (2015a). Preface to MOOCs and open education special issues: the power of four. MOOCs and open education. Special Issue of International Journal on E-Learning, 14(3), 265–277.Google Scholar
  4. Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (2015b). MOOCs and open education around the world. NY: Routledge. ISBN-10: 1138807419.Google Scholar
  5. Crosslin, M. (2014). Designing a dual-layer cMOOC/xMOOC [weblog post]. Retrieved from
  6. Crosslin, M. (2015). Digging into what “choice” is in customizable modality/dual-layer [weblog post]. Retrieved from
  7. Crosslin, M., & Dellinger, J. (2015). Lessons learned while designing and implementing a multiple pathways xMOOC+ cMOOC. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2015(1), 7760–7765.Google Scholar
  8. Dawson, S., Joksimović, S., Kovanović, V., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2015). Recognizing learner autonomy: lessons and reflections from a joint x/c MOOC. Proceedings of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia 2015.Google Scholar
  9. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80(2015), 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Merrill, D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(3), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Merrill, D. (2015). Addressing the elephant: using systems thinking to address the MOOCs and social media in design & development. [AECT Presidential Panel Discussion]. Association of Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, 2015.Google Scholar
  12. Rosé, C. P., Ferschke, O., Tomar, G., Yang, D., Howley, I., Aleven, V., et al. (2015). Challenges and opportunities of dual-layer MOOCs: Reflections from an edX deployment study. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2015), 2 (pp. 848–851). Gothenburg: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  13. Siemens, G. (2014). Multiple pathways: Blending xMOOCs & cMOOCs [weblog post]. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications & Technology 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North TexasDentonUSA
  2. 2.LINK Research LabUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations