Abstract
Design involves solving complex, ill-structured problems. Design tasks are consequently, appropriate contexts for children to exercise higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills. Although creating engaging and authentic design contexts for young children is difficult within the confines of traditional schooling, recently, game-design has emerged as an alternative context to provide young children with opportunities to practice design and thinking skills. Despite the increasing interest from educators and researchers to use game-design as a platform to teach young students higher-order thinking skills, literature documenting design and development of such learning experiences has been scarce. This paper provides a detailed account of how a complex network of pedagogies, theories, and technologies were brought together to design and develop the Game Design and Learning (GDL) program, with the purpose of teaching students basics of computer programming, and to give them hands-on experiences in game-design, and teach them complex problem-solving skills. The GDL program can serve as an example for efforts aiming to create similar technology-rich environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference? Future of Learning Group Publication, 5(3), 1–11.
Akcaoglu M. (2014) Learning problem-solving through making games at the game design and learning summer program. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(5), 583-600. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9347-4.
Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72–81. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.003.
Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2010). A case study of educational game design by kids and for kids. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5242–5246. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.853.
Bonnardel, N., & Zenasni, F. (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in design: an enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 180–191. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x.
Denner, J., Werner, L., & Ortiz, E. (2012). Computer games created by middle school girls: can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education, 58(1), 240–249.
Eseryel, D., Ifenthaler, D., & Ge, X. (2013). Towards innovation in complex problem solving research: an introduction to the special issue. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 359–363. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9299-0.
Fowler, A., & Cusack, B. (2011). Enhancing introductory programming with Kodu Game Lab: An exploratory study. In M. Lopez & M. Verhaart (Eds.), Proceedings from 2nd Annual Conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand (CITRENZ2011) (pp. 69–79). New Zealand: Christchurch.
Fullerton, T. (2008). Game design workshop. Boston, MA: Elsevier.
Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: a case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133–142.
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355.
Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395–429.
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–32.
Hwang, G.-J., Hung, C.-M., & Chen, N.-S. (2013). Improving learning achievements, motivations and problem-solving skills through a peer assessment-based game development approach. Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9320-7.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.
Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ke, F. (2014). An implementation of design-based learning through creating educational computer games: a case study on mathematics learning during design and computing. Computers & Education, 73(1), 26–39. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.010.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. doi:10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Kurland, D. M., Pea, R. D., Clement, C., & Mawby, R. (1986). A study of the development of programming ability and thinking skills in high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(4), 429–458.
Li, Q. (2010). Digital game building: learning in a participatory culture. Educational Research, 52(4), 427–443. doi:10.1080/00131881.2010.524752.
MacLaurin, M. B. (2011). The design of Kodu: a tiny visual programming language for children on the Xbox 360. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 46(1), 241–246.
Mayer, R. E. (1977). Thinking and problem solving: An introduction to human cognition and learning. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26(1), 49–63.
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. The American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14.
Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (1996). Problem-solving transfer. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 47–62). New York, NY: Macmillan Library Reference.
Mayer, R. E., & Wittrock, M. C. (2006). Problem solving. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 287–303). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Microsoft Kodu. (2012). Microsoft Research. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/kodu/.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S., & Harel, I. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (Vol. 36, pp. 1–11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE). Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=950596.
Resnick, L. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.
Robertson, J. (2012). Making games in the classroom: benefits and gender concerns. Computers & Education, 59(2), 385–398. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.020.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1987). Transfer of cognitive skills from programming: when and how? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 149–169.
Scratch. (2012). Retrieved from http://scratch.mit.edu/.
Simon, H. A. (1995). Problem forming, problem finding, and problem solving in design. In A. Collen & W. W. Gasparski (Eds.), Design and systems: General applications of methodology (Vol. 3)ems (Vol. 3, pp. 245–257). Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Smith, K., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17.
Stolee, K. T., & Fristoe, T. (2011). Expressing computer science concepts through Kodu Game Lab. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 99–104).
Touretzky, D. S., Marghitu, D., Ludi, S., Bernstein, D., & Ni, L. (2013). Accelerating K-12 computational thinking using scaffolding, staging, and abstraction. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 609–614). ACM.
Weintrop, D., & Wilensky, U. (2012). RoboBuilder: Video game program-to-play constructionist. In Constructionism 2012 (pp. 1–5). Athens, Greece.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akcaoglu, M. Design and Implementation of the Game-Design and Learning Program. TechTrends 60, 114–123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0022-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0022-y