, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 14–17 | Cite as

Conversations with innovators in learning and technology

By Fredrick W. Baker III


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker III, F.W. (2014). Policies related to the implementation of openness at research intensive universities in the united states: A descriptive content analysis (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from
  2. Hart, J (2015). Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies. [Website]. Retrieved from
  3. Joosten, T., Pasquini, L. A., & Harness, L. (2013). Guiding social media in our institutions. Planning for Higher Education, 41(2), 125135.Google Scholar
  4. Pasquini, L. A. (2014). Organizational identity and community values: Determining meaning in post-secondary education social media guidelines and policy documents. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.Google Scholar
  5. Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning theory or pastime of the selfamused. Manitoba, Canada: University of Manitoba -Learning Technologies Centre. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Creative Commons License at
  6. Smith, B. (2015, February 27). PIE chat: George Siemens, University of Texas Arlington. tte PIE News. Retrieved from Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.Google Scholar
  8. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2015

Personalised recommendations