, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 64–70 | Cite as

Transparency in the ePortfolio Creation Process

  • Stephanie A. JonesEmail author
  • Elizabeth Downs
  • Stephen J. Jenkins


This paper presents the findings of a study examining the effect of transparency on the ePortfolio creation process. The purpose of the study was to examine whether increased awareness of other students’ ePortfolios through the implementation of transparency and peer review would positively affect the quality of performance of school library media candidates’ ePortfolios


ePortfolios instructional strategies instructional technology school library media transparency Web 2.0 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bollinger, D.U. & Shepherd, C.E. (2010). Student perceptions of eportfolio integration in online courses. Distance Education, 31(3), 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Conrad, R., & Donaldson, J. A. (2011). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. Updated edition. Jossey-Bass, an imprint of Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Dalsgaard, C & Paulsen, M.F. (2009). Transparency in cooperative online education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3). Available at
  4. Dow, M. J. (2008). Implications of social presence for online learning: A case study of MLS students. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 49(4), 231–242.Google Scholar
  5. Jones, E. (2010). A professional practice portfolio for quality learning. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 292–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones, S. A., Downs, E., & Repman, J. (2012). The evolution of ePortfolios for school library education: A case study. School Libraries Worldwide, 18(2), 12–20.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, S. A., Green, L., Hodges, C. B., Kennedy, K. M., Downs, E., Repman, J. L., Clark, K. F. (2012). Supplementing the course management system: Using Web 2.0 for collaboration, communication, and productivity in the preparation of school technology leaders. In D. Polly, C. Mims, & K. Persichitte (Ed.), Developing Technology- Rich Teacher Education Programs (pp. 118–134). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI:  10.4018/978-1-4666-0014-0.ch009
  8. Lieberman, A., & Mace, D.P. (2010). Making practice public: Teacher learning in the 21st century. Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1–2), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lowenthal, P.R., & Thomas, D. (2010). Death to the digital dropbox: Rethinking student privacy and public performance. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 33(3). Available at
  10. Pecheone, R. L., Pigg, M. J., Chung, R. R., & Souviney, R. (2005). Performance assessment and electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education. Clearing House, 78(4), 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schofield, J. W., & Davidson, A. L. (2002). Bringing the internet to school: Lessons from an urban district. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Tucker, P. D., Stronge, J. H., Gareis, C. R., & Beers, C. S. (2003). The efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional development: Do they make a difference?. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 572–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Waycott, J., Sheard, J., Thompson, C., & Clerehan, R. (2013). Making students’ work visible on the social web: A blessing or a curse?. Computers & Education, 6886–95. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.026

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie A. Jones
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elizabeth Downs
    • 1
  • Stephen J. Jenkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Georgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations