Abstract
This study examined how 30 minutes of search time on the Web affected students’ essay scores in response to a writing prompt. Expository essays were obtained from 49 fourth- and fifthgrade students enrolled in an elementary school in Virginia, in the United States. Students were placed by random assignment into three groups with the same writing prompt for all three groups. Data analyses using ANOVA indicate that there was statistical significance in two components of writing. The group that received instruction on using the Internet to conduct research in the prewriting phase outperformed the control group in two areas: the total essay score (p=.053) and usage/mechanics (p=.028). The study also produced effect sizes ranging from small to large when the Internet users were compared to the control group. Implications for the future of Internet use in the school system are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbas, J., Kimball, M., Bishop, K., D’Elia, G. (2008). Youth, public libraries, and the Internet: Part four: Why youth do not use the public library. Public Libraries, 47(1), 80-85.
Barone, D. (2012). Exploring home and school involvement of young children with Web 2.0 and social media. Research in the Schools, 19(1), 1-11.
Blake, C. (2009). Potential of text-based internet chats for improving oral fluency in a second language. Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 227-240.
Boxie, P. & Maring, G.H. (2002). Using Web-based activities to enhance writing in science: The dynamic Earth project. The Teacher Educator, 38(2), 99-111.
Bromann-Bender, J. (2013). You can’t fool me: Website evaluation. Library Media Connection, 31(5), 42-45.
Bruce, H. W. (1999). Perceptions of the Internet: What people think when they search the Internet for information. Internet Research, 9(3), 187-199.
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D.F., Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C. (2013). Examining dimensions of selfefficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25-38.
Chen, S. Y. & Fu, Y.C. (2009). Internet use and academic achievement: Gender differences in early adolescence. Adolescence, 44(126), 797-812.
de Kunder, M. (2011). The size of the world wide web. Retrieved June 4, 2011 from http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/
DeSilver, D. (2013). Few students likely to use print books for research. A Report from the Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/07/30/few-students-likely-to-use-printbooks-for-research/
Desjarlais, M. & Willoughby, T. (2007). Supporting learners with low domain knowledge when using the Internet. Journal of Educational Computing Research,37(1), 1-17.
D’Esposito, J. E. & Gardner, R.M. (1999). University students’ perception of the Internet: An exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(6), 456-461.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149-164.
Hansen, J. (2001). When writers read. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Heyman, G.D., & Legare, C.H. (2005). Children’s evaluation of sources of information about traits. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 636–647.
Ketter, J. & Pool, J. (2001). Exploring the impact of a highstakes direct writing assessment in two high school classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(3), 344-393.
Kral, J. (2007). The necessity of website evaluation. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 23(7), 12-15.
Larsen, K. (2005). How to analyze online resources: Library lessons. Library Sparks, 3(4), 17-23.
Lenhart, A., Arafah, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. R. (2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf.pdf
Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and technology, 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teens-and-Tech.aspx
Mandalios, J. (2013). RADAR: An approach for helping students evaluate Internet sources. Journal of Information Science, 39(4) 470–478.
Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38(6), 607-633.
Meyers, B.J.F., Middlemiss, W., Theodorou, E., Brezynski, K.L., & McDougall, J. (2002). Effects of structure strategy instruction delivered to fifth-grade children using the Internet with and without the aide of older adult tutors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 486-519.
Mobley, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Cultural aspects of Internet usage: A preliminary study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 46(3), 109-113.
Mostow, J., Nelson-Taylor, J., & Beck, J. (2013). Computerguided oral reading versus independent practice: comparison of sustained silent reading to an automated reading tutor that listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 249-276.
Myers & Savage (2005). Enhancing student comprehension of social studies material. Social Studies, 96(1), 18-23.
Pajares, F., & Johnson, M.J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: the role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28, 313-331.
Pieper, J. & Mentzer, N. (2013). High school students’ use of paper-based and Internet-based information sources in the engineering design process science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Technology Education, 24(2), 78-95.
Priemer, B. & Ploog, M. (2007). The influence of text production on learning with the Internet. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 613-622.
Ritchie, M., & Black, C. (2012). Public internet forums: can they enhance argumentative writing skills of second language learners? Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 349-361.
Schultz, K., & Fecho, B. (2000). Society’s child: Social context and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 51–62.
Stevens, K. E., & Stevens, R. E,(1996). Use of the world-wide web in lower-division chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(10), 923.
Takeuchi, L. (2011). Families matter: Designing Media for a Digital Age. A report produced for the Joan Ganz Cooney Center. Retrieved from http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/publication/families-matter-designingmedia-for-a-digital-age/
Thompson, B. (2007). Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and confidence intervals for effect sizes. Psychology in the Schools, 44(5), 423-32.
Van Gundy, K., Morton, B.A., Liu, H. Q., & Kline, J. (2006). Effects of web-based instruction on math anxiety, the sense of master, and global self-esteem: A quasi-experimental study of undergraduate statistics students. Teaching Sociology, 34(4), 370-388.
Walton, M. (2006). Web reaches new milestone: 100 million sites. Retrieved February 16, 2008 from http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/11/01/100millionwebsites/index.html
Willoughby, T., Anderson, A. S., Wood, E., Mueller, J., & Ross, C. (2009). Fast searching for information on the Internet to use in a learning context: The impact of domain knowledge. Computers & Education, 52(3), 640-648.
Young, K. (2008). Toward a model for the study of children’s informal Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 173-184.
Zhou, L., Griffin-Shirley, N., Kelley, P., Banda, D. R., Lan, W. Y., Parker, A. T., & Smith, D. W. (2012). The relationship between computer and internet use and performance on standardized tests by secondary school students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 106(10), 609-621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doan, K., Bloomfield, A. The effects of browse time on the Internet on students’ essay scores. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 58, 63–72 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0805-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0805-y