Skip to main content

Using screen capture feedback to improve academic performance


Feedback is an effective instructional practice for improving achievement. The importance of feedback has been understood by teachers for many years, yet recent research has elevated its status. One characteristic of effective feedback is personalized comments, which assist students in understanding their performance. Most research analyzes the effects of written feedback. Some current studies have examined the effects of alternative delivery methods, such as audio. One new approach for creating and delivering feedback is through screen capture technology. A case study was conducted to examine the effects of this method on the academic performance of 36 undergraduate students in a teacher education course. Results showed that screen capture feedback is effective for guiding corrections on a writing assignment. Students also reported that feedback was useful for knowing what they were doing right or wrong and that they would prefer more feedback of this type.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Andrade, H. L. & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of formative assessment. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Association of American Colleges and Universities (2012). Valid assessment of learning in undergraduate education. Retrieved from

  3. Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, N. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ views: How did e-feedback through assessment facilitate their learning? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 16-33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analysis using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analysis. The Psychonomic Society, 41, 1149-1160.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harlen, W., & James, M. (1996, April). Creating a positive impact of assessment on learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

  8. Hattie, J. & Timperley, N. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students’ sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, N., Georghiades, P., & Gunson, J. (2012). Student feedback via screen capture digital video: Stimulating student’s modified action. Higher Education, 64, 593-607. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karat, C. M., Halverson, C., Horn, D., & Karat, J. (1999). Patterns of entry and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. Proceedings of the CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery

  12. Kim, E. (2005). The effects of digital audio on social presence, motivation and perceived learning in asynchronous learning networks (Doctoral dissertation, New Jersey Institute of Technology). Retrieved from

  13. McGrath, A. L., Taylor, A., & Pychyl, T. A. (2011). Writing helpful feedback: The influence of feedback type on students’ perceptions and writing performance. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 1-16. Retrieved from

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mellen, C., & Sommers, J. (2003). Audio-taped responses and the two-year-campus writing classroom: The twosided desk, the guy with the ax, and the chirping birds. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 31(1), 25-39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merry, S. & Orsmond, P. (2008). Students’ attitudes to and usage of academic feedback provided via audio files. Bioscience Education, 11, 1-11. Retrieved from

  16. Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen, G. A. (1982). Beyond evaluation: The recorded response to essays. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 8(2), 121-123.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Page, E. B. (1958). Teacher comments and student performance: A seventy-four classroom experiment in school motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49(4), 173-181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science 28(1), 4-13. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830280103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart, L., & White, M. (1976). Teacher comments, letter grades, and student performance: What do we really know? Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 488-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhai, S., Hunter, M., & Smith, B. A. (2002). Performance optimization of virtual keyboards. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 229-269. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI172&3_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. Denton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denton, D.W. Using screen capture feedback to improve academic performance. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 58, 51–56 (2014).

Download citation


  • case study
  • feedback
  • formative assessment
  • revision
  • screen capture
  • teacher education