, Volume 58, Issue 6, pp 42–50 | Cite as

Emerging instructional technologies: Exploring the extent of faculty use of web 2.0 tools at a midwestern community college



The purpose of this research is to provide insight into the several aspects of instructional use of emerging web-based technologies. The study first explores the extent of Web 2.0 technology integration into face-to-face classroom activities. In this phase, the main focus of research interests was on the types and dynamics of Web 2.0 tools used by community college instructors. In the second phase, we were predominantly interested in instructors’ preferences toward tools and the major barriers instructors confront in integrating these tools in a traditional educational setting. The study reveals the extent of instructors’ use of Web 2.0 tools in the classroom relates to a) their level of education and b) training on the tools. Results clearly indicate that level of education and current use of web 2.0 technologies in instruction are major determinants of the instructors’ preferences toward different groups of Web 2.0 tools. Finally, lack of faculty training opportunities was identified as the main barrier for using Web 2.0 technologies. The study offers research based evidence which undoubtedly represent the current trends and issues in the process of technology integration into course curriculum at a community college level. Considering obtained findings, we suggest implementation of an institutional and systematic approach to reinforce inclusion of Web 2.0 technologies in traditional teaching and learning.


web 2.0 technologies traditional instruction community college faculty development and curriculum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cannon, D, (2006). Web 2.0 is branding Web 2.0: How businesses can leverage web technologies to increase brand preferences. Movio Integrated Branding,11,1. Retrieved Sept 6, from
  2. Chih-Hsiung, T., Blocher, M., & Ntoruru, J. (2008). Integrate Web 2.0 technology to facilitate online professional community: EMI special editing experiences. Educational Media International, 45(4), 335-341. doi: 10.1080/09523980802588634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dede C., Breit L., Ketelhut D. J., McCloskey, E., & Whitehouse P. (2005). An overview of current findings from empirical research on online teacher professional development. Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  4. Drexler, W., Baralt, A., & Dawson, K. (2008). The teach web 2.0 consortium: A tool to promote educational social networking and web 2.0 use among educators. Educational Media International, 45(4), 271-283. doi: 10.1080/09523980802571499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dusick, D. M. & Yildirim, S. (2000). Faculty computer use and training: Identifying distinct needs for different populations. Community College Review, 27(4), 33-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Handsfield, L.J., Dean, T.R., & Cielocha, K.M. (2009). Becoming critical consumers and producers of text: Teaching literacy with web 1.0 and web 2.0. The Reading Teacher, 63(1), pp. 40-50. DOI: 10.1598/RT.63.1.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackowski, M. B. (2005). An examination of factors that affect community college faculty’s use of technology for teaching: A comparison of full-time and part-time faculty. North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  8. Kenney, B. (2007). You 2.0. School Library Journal, 53(1), 11Google Scholar
  9. Maduakolam, I., & Bell, E. (2003). A product-based faculty professional development model for infusing technology into teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 3(3), pp. 340-352.Google Scholar
  10. Olaniran, B. A. (2009, December). Culture, learning styles, and Web 2.0. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 261-271.Google Scholar
  11. O’Reilly, T. (2005, September). What Is Web 2.0. Retrieved from O’Reilly, Spreading the knowledge of innovators:
  12. Surry, D.W., Land, S.M. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education & Training International, 37(2), 145-153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nebraska LincolnLincolnUSA
  2. 2.Mount Saint Mary CollegeNewburghUSA

Personalised recommendations