TechTrends

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 95–101

A professional development framework for online teaching

Article

Abstract

The quality of online programs in higher education is strongly correlated with how the professional development approaches respond to the needs of online teachers. These approaches are critical in helping online teachers adopt online pedagogical practices and reconstruct their teacher persona in an online environment. This study proposes a nested professional development framework for online teaching. The proposed framework intends to recognize successful online teaching in higher education as an outcome of the interaction of support activities at teaching, community, and organization levels.

Keywords

professional development online online teaching higher education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2013). Tracing succesfull online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3). p.-. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org.
  2. Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011).Transforming online teaching practice: A critical analysis of the online teaching literature. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, T., & Chen, T. (2006). Examination of attitudes towards teaching online courses based on theory of reasoned action of university faculty in Taiwan. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 683-693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conceicao, S. (2006). Faculty lived experiences in the online environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(1), 26-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook, R. G., Ley, K., Crawford, C., & Warner, A. (2009). Motivators and inhibitors for university faculty in distance and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 149-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coppola, N., Hiltz, S., & Rotter, N. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 169-189.Google Scholar
  8. Correia, A.-P., & Yusop, F. (2010). Teaching Online: A Quick Reference for Online Instructors. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Seed Science Center.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, N. E. (2009). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In Joke Voogt & Gerald Knezek (Eds.) International handbook of information technology in education (pp. 507-542). Amsterdam: Kluwer Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dawley, L. (2007). The tools for successful online teaching. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feist, L. (2003). Removing barriers to professional development. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 30(11), 30-36.Google Scholar
  14. Gorsky, P., & Blau, I. (2009). Online teaching effectiveness: A tale of two instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,10 (3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/712
  15. Howell, S., Saba, F., Lindsay, N., & Williams, P. (2004). Seven strategies for enabling faculty success in distance education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 33-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Inan, F. & Lowther, D. (2009). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King, K. P. (2002). Educational technology professional development as transformative learning opportunities. Computers & Education, 39(3), 283-297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kopcha, T. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreber, C., & Kanuka, H. (2006). The scholarship of teaching and learning and the online classroom. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, 32(2), 109-131.Google Scholar
  20. Lao, T., & Gonzales, C. (2005). Understanding online learning through a qualitative description of professors and students’ experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 459-474.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, J. (2001). Instructional support for distance education and faculty motivation, commitment, and satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 153-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, Q., & Akins, M. (2005). Sixteen myths about online teaching and learning in higher education: Don’t believe everything you hear. TechTrends, 49(4), 51-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lowenthal, P.R., Thomas, D., Thai, A., & Yuhnke, B. (Eds.) (2009). The CU Online Handbook: Teach differentlyCreate and collaborate. University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado. Retrieved from http://ucdenver.edu/academics/CUOnline/FacultyResources/additionalResources/Handbook/Documents/CU_Online_Handbook_2009.pdf Google Scholar
  24. Maguire, L. (2005). Literature review – faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/maguire81.htm
  25. Major, C. (2010). Do virtual professors dream of electric students? College faculty experiences with online distance education. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2154-2208.Google Scholar
  26. Milheim, W. (2001). Faculty and administrative strategies for the effective implementation of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 535-542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oblinger, D., Barone, C., & Hawkins, B. (2001). Distributed education and its challenges: An overview. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  28. Poe, M. & Stassen, M.L.A. (Eds) (2002). Teaching and Learning Online: Communication, Community, and Assessment. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. Retrieved from http://www.umass.edu/oapa/oapa/publications/online_handbooks/Teaching_and_Learning_Online_Handbook.pdf Google Scholar
  29. Restauri, S. (2004). Creating an effective online distance education program using targeted support factors. TechTrends, 48(6), 32-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.Google Scholar
  31. Rovai, A., & Downey, J. (2009). Why some distance education programs fail while others succeed in a global environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 141-147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Samarawickrema, G., & Stacey, E. (2007). Adopting web-based learning and teaching: A case study in higher education. Distance Education, 28(3), 313-333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandholtz, J. H., & Reilly, B. (2004). Teachers, not technicians: Rethinking technical expectations for teachers. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 487-512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tallent-Runnels, M., Thomas, J., Lan, W., Cooper, S., Ahern, T., Shaw, S., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taylor, A., & McQuiggan, C. (2008). Faculty development programming: If we build it, will they come? Educause Quarterly, 31(3), 28-37.Google Scholar
  36. Thurmond, V., Wambach, K., Connors, H., & Frey, B. (2002). Evaluation of student satisfaction: Determining the impact of a web-based environment by controlling for student characteristics. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 169-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Middle East Technical UniversityÇankayaTurkey
  2. 2.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  3. 3.Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü Dumlupınar BulvarıÇankayaTurkey

Personalised recommendations