Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Experimental Investigation of Videotaped Lectures in Online Courses

TechTrends volume 58, pages 63–70 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Lecture videos are often praised as a great medium of instruction in online education. There is a lack of research, however, that tests whether videos are superior to other teaching tools in online classes. This article examines whether videos are better than lecture notes and still slides in an online introductory political science course. The results show that lecture videos might not be the best tool of instruction for introductory students. Students in the non-video course gave higher evaluations of the instructor and the course and scored higher on exams.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Althaus, Scott (1997) “Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions.” Communication Education 46: 158-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astleitner, Hermann (2002). “Teaching critical thinking online.” Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29(2).

  • Belcheir, Marcia J. & Cucek, Mira (2001) “Student perceptions of their distance education courses.” Retrieved March 1, 2011 from http://www.boisestate.edu/iassess/reports/2001/RR2001-04.pdf

  • Carr-Chellman, Allison & Duchastel, Philip (2000). “The ideal online course.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 31: 229-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, V. (1996) “Do media influence learning? Revisiting the debate in the context of distance education.” Open Learning, February: 31-40.

  • Cavanaugh, Joseph (2005) “Teaching online – a time comparison.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8.

  • Chanlin, Lih-Juan (1997) “The effects of verbal elaboration and visual elaboration on student learning.” International Journal of Instructional Media, 24: 333-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chanlin, Lih-Juan (1998) “Animation to teach students of different knowledge levels.” Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25: 166-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Hee Jun & Johnson, Scott D. (2005) “The effect of context-based video instruction on learning and motivation in online courses.” The American Journal of Distance Education 19(4): 215-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christel, Michael G. (1994) “The role of visual fidelity in computer-based instruction.” Human-Computer Interaction, 9: 183–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1982) “Review of media in instruction: 60 years of research.” Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(1): 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983) “Reconsidering research on learning from media.” Review of Educational Research, 53: 445-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1985) “Confounding in educational computing research.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2): 445-460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1991) “When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media.” Educational Technology 31(2): 34-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1994A) “Media will never influence learning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 42(2): 21-29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1994B) “Media and method.” Educational Technology Research and Development 42: 7-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, John, Dutton, Mary, & Perry, Jo (2001). “Do online students perform as well as lecture students?” Journal of Engineering Education, 131-136.

  • Dutton, John, Dutton, Mary, & Perry, Jo (2002) “How do online students differ from lecture students?” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1)

  • Edwards, Clark & Fritz, Janie H. (1997) “Evaluation of three educational online delivery approaches.” Mid-South Instructional Technology Conference Proceedings.

  • Evans, Heather K. (2012) “Making politics ‘click’: The costs and benefits of using clickers in an introductory political science course.” Journal of Political Science Education 8:85-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garson, G. David. (1998) “Evaluating implementation of web-based teaching in political science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31: 585-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, L. R., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2005). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris A. (1990) “Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news.” Journal of Communication 40(3): 134-156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, Kerstin, Pollock, Philip H. & Wilson, Bruce M. (2009) “Learning from ‘listening’ to peers in online political science classes.” Journal of Political Science Education 5:1-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Nancy E. & Gladfelter, John (1996) “Teaching graduate psychology seminars using electronic mail: Creative distance education.” Teaching of Psychology 23(4): 252-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartsell, Taralynn & Yuen, Steve Chi-Yin (2006) “Video streaming in online learning.”AACE Journal 14(1): 31-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Gail D. (2009) “Using videos to bring lecture to the online classroom.” College Quarterly 12(1).

  • Kozma, R. (1994) “Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.” Education Technology Research and Development 42(2): 7-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, Stephen G., Guffey, J. Stephen & Rampp, Larry C. (2000). Changes in student attitudes regarding a webbased health profession course. New York: Institute for Education and Social Policy. (ERIC Document No. ED 441-386)

  • McKay, Elspeth. (1999) “An investigation of text-based instructional materials enhanced with graphics.” Educational Psychology, 19, 323-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maag, Margaret (2004) “The effectiveness of an interactive multimedia learning tool on nursing students’ math knowledge and self-efficacy.” Computers, Informatics, Nursing 22 (1):26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Richard E. (2009) Multimedia learning. (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Richard E., Bove, William, Bryman, Alexandra, Mars, Rebecca & Tapangco, Lene (1996) “When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 88: 64-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, David. (2009) “Most college students to take classes online by 2014.” Campus Technology Available at: http://campustechnology.com/articles/2009/10/28/most-college-students-to-take-classes-onlineby-2014.aspx

  • Ngu, Bing Hiong (2002) “Online instruction versus faceto- face instruction at UNIMAS.” International Journal of Educational Technology 3(1): 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Clint N. & Ridley, Dennis R. (1997) “Factors affecting college students’ persistence in on-line computer-managed instruction.” College Student Journal 31(4).

  • Rose, Katherine Kensinger. (2009). “Student perceptions of the use of instructor-made videos in online and faceto-face classes.” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 5(3)

  • Schnitman, Ivana. (2007) The dynamics involved in Webbased learning environment (WLE) interface design and human-computer interactions (HCI): Connections with learning performance (Doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Stephen M. & Woody, Paul C. (2000) “Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles.” Teaching of Psychology, 27: 220-223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Patrick. (2002) “ “It’s easier to be yourself when you are invisible”: Female college students discuss their online classroom experiences.” Innovative Higher Education 27(2).

  • Stover, Catherine. (2005) “Measuring—and understanding—student retention.” Distance Education Report, 9(16).

  • Tallent-Runnels, Mary K., Thomas, Julie A., Lan, William Y. & Sandi Cooper. (2006). “Teaching courses online: A review of the research.” Review of Educational Research 76(1): 93-135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tantrarungroj, Pornsook (2008) Effect of embedded streaming video strategy in an online learning environment on the learning of neuroscience (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University, Terre Haute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatley, Janice & Ahmad, Amrey (2007). “Using video to record summary lectures to aid students’ revision.” Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3.

  • Williams, P., Lindsay, N.K., Howell, S., (2001). “Thirtytwo trends affecting distance education: An informed foundation for strategic planning.” Wiley Online Library.

  • Zhang, Dongsong, Zhou, Linda, Briggs, Robert O., & Nunamaker Jr., Jay F. (2006) “Instructional video in elearning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness.” Information and Management 43:15-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sam Houston State University, TX, USA

    Heather K. Evans

Authors
  1. Heather K. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather K. Evans.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evans, H.K. An Experimental Investigation of Videotaped Lectures in Online Courses. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 58, 63–70 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0753-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0753-6

Keywords

search

Navigation