TechTrends

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 54–62 | Cite as

Development of a Virtual Technology Coach to Support Technology Integration for K-12 Educators

Article

Abstract

In an effort to develop a virtual technology coach for K-12 educators, this article analyzed survey results from sixty teachers with regards to specific resources that a technology coach could provide within a virtual environment. A virtual technology coach was proposed as a possible solution to provide continual professional development for teachers to support their technology integration efforts. Results indicate that the Collaboration, Discussion, Learning, and Sharing resources of a virtual technology coach are considered valuable. This finding appears to corroborate the importance of developing a professional learning community to promote effective and sustained technology integration strategies among teachers. In addition, these virtual technology coaching attributes are identified in current education coaching (NETS*C) standards pointing to a potential support structure for schools and school districts implementing the NETS*C standards.

Keywords

Online learning, PreK-12 schools Professional Development Technology Coaches Technology Integration Virtual environments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beglau, M., Hare, J.C., Foltos, L., Gann, K., James, J., Jobe, H., Knight, J. & Smith, B. (2011). Technology, Coaching and Community [PDF document]. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/learn/coaching-white-paper.aspxGoogle Scholar
  2. Cifuentes, L., Maxwell, G., & Bulu, S. (2011). Technology integration through professional learning community. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 59-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Edmodo (2012). Edmodo. Retrieved from http://www.edmodo.comGoogle Scholar
  4. Gallucci, C., Van Lare, M., Yoon, I. H., & Boatright, B. (2010). Instructional coaching: Building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 919-963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Graesser, A. C., Jeon, M., & Dufty, D. (2008). Agent technologies designed to facilitate interactive knowledge construction. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 45(4-5), 298-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holmes, A., Signer, B., & MacLeod, A. (2011). Professional development at a distance: A mixed-method study exploring inservice teachers’ views on presence online. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(2), 76-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. International Society for Technology in Education (2012). Digital age coaching. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-coachesGoogle Scholar
  8. Lewis, L. A., Koston, Z., Quartley, M., & Adsit, J. (2010). Virtual communities of practice: Bridging research and practice using Web 2.0. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(2), 155-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Daniel Strahl, J. J., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45(3), 195-213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  11. Pella, S. (2011). A situative perspective on developing writing pedagogy in a teacher professional learning community. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(1), 107-125.Google Scholar
  12. Singer, J., Lotter, C., Feller, R., & Gates, H. (2011). Exploring a model of situated professional development: Impact on classroom practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(3), 203-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. UsabilityNet (2012). Paper prototyping. Retrieved from http://www.usabilitynet.net/tools/prototyping.htmGoogle Scholar
  14. Vanderburg, M., & Stephens, D. (2010). The impact of literacy coaches: What teachers value and how teachers change. Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 141-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the U.S. and abroad: Technical report. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, School Redesign Network and National School Development Council.Google Scholar
  16. Wong, J. N. (2010). Searching for good practice in teaching: A comparison of two subject-based professional learning communities in a secondary school in Shanghai. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(5), 623-639.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Sugar
    • 1
  • Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon
    • 1
  1. 1.East Carolina UniversityNCUSA

Personalised recommendations