, Volume 58, Issue 2, pp 59–77 | Cite as

EFL Writers' Attitudes and Perceptions toward F-Portfolio Use

  • Selami AydinEmail author
Original Paper


Atitudes toward and perceptions of using Facebook as a portfolio-keeping tool in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. In general, existing research reveals primarily positive effects of Facebook on educational activities, and research on portfolio keeping in EFL writing shows both benefits and problem areas. Thus, the current study aims to investigate EFL writers’ attitudes toward using Facebook as a portfolio (F-Portfolio) tool and their perceptions regarding its benefits and problems. The sample group consisted of 101 EFL learners. A portfolio attitude scale, portfolio contribution questionnaire and a portfolio problem questionnaire were used to collect data. Four results were obtained from the study: (1) EFL writers have positive attitudes toward the use of F-Portfolios in EFL writing; (2) F-Portfolios improve EFL learNo results have been reported regarding at- ners’ knowledge of vocabulary and grammar, as well as their research, reading and writing skills; (3) EFL learners perceive some problems during the F-Portfolio process; and (4) some independent variables are significantly correlated with a limited number of items in the scales.


English as a foreign language Writing Portfolio Facebook Attitudes Perceptions 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Long Grove, IL; Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aydin, S. (2010a). EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping. Assessing Writing, 15(3), 194–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aydin, S. (2010b). A qualitative research on portfolio keeping in English as a foreign language writing. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 475–488.Google Scholar
  4. Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on Facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 6(6), 1093–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baturay, M. H. & Daloglu, A. (2010). E-portfolio assessment in an online language course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(5), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boon, S. & Sinclair, C. (2009). A world I don’t inhabit: Disquiet and identity in Second Life and Facebook. Educational Media International, 46(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowers-Campbell, J. (2008). Cyber “pokes: Motivational antidote for developmental college readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 39(1), 74–87.Google Scholar
  8. Boyden-Knudsen, T. (2001). The effects of analytic corrections and revisions on college composition students in a portfolio assessment setting. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J. D., Keller, S. Stern, S. (2009). Sex, sexuality, sex- ting, and sexed: Adolescents and the media. Prevention Researcher, 16(4), 12–16.Google Scholar
  10. Burksaitiene, N., & Tereseviciene, M. (2008). Integrating alternative learning and assessment in a course of English for law students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catanzaro, M. F. (2011). Indirect aggression, bullying and female teen victimization: A literature review. Pastoral Care in Education, 29(2), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chang, Y., Wu, C., & Ku, H. (2005). The introduction of electronic portfolios to teach and assess English as a foreign language. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 49(1), 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charlton, T., Devlin, M. & Drummond, S. (2009). Using “Facebook” to improve communication in undergraduate software development teams. Computer Science Education, 19(4), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, D. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  15. Corda, A. & Jager, S. (2004). ELLIPS: Providing web-based language learning for higher education in the Netherlands. ReCALL, 16(1), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, M. R. (2010). Social networking goes to school. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 76(3), 14–19.Google Scholar
  17. Decarie, C. (2010). Facebook: Challenges and opportunities for business communication students. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delett, J. S., Barnhardt, S., & Kevorkian, J. A. (2001). A framework for portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34(6), 559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denny, H. (2010). Introduction to “multiliteracies, social futures, and writing centers. Writing Center Journal, 30(1), 84–87.Google Scholar
  20. DePew, K. E. (2011). Social media at academia’s periphery: Studying multilingual developmental writers’ Facebook composing strategies. Reading Matrix, 11(1), 54–75.Google Scholar
  21. Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drouin, M. A. (2011). College students’ text messaging, use of textese and literacy skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Durkee, D., Brant, S, Nevin, P, Odell, A., Williams, G. Melomey, D., Roberts, H., Imafidon, C., Perryman, R. & Lopes, A. (2009). Implementing e-learning and Web 2.0 innovation: Didactical scenarios and practical implication. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenhow, C. (2009). Tapping the wealth of social networks for professional development. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(8), 10–11.Google Scholar
  26. Hirvela, A., & Sweetland, Y. L. (2005). Two case studies of L2 writers’ experiences across learning directed portfolio contexts. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 192–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang, J. J. S., Yang, S. J. H., Huang, Y. M. and Hsiao, I. Y. T. (2010). Social learning networks: Build mobile learning networks based on collaborative services. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 78–92.Google Scholar
  28. Hung, S. T. (2008). Promoting self-assessment strategies: An electronic portfolio approach. The Asian EFL Journal, 11(2), 129146.Google Scholar
  29. Ikeda, M. & Takeuchi, O. (2006). Clarifying the differences in learning EFL reading strategies: An analysis of portfolios. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 384–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N. & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaminsky, D. E. (1993). Helping Elementary English as a second language students to become independent learners by improving their reading strategies. Retrieved on 7 March 2012 from (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED36510).Google Scholar
  32. Kitsis, S. M. (2008). The Facebook generation: Homework as social networking. English Journal, 98(2), 30–36.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis, P. (1997). Using productivity software for beginning language learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 24(8), 14–17.Google Scholar
  34. Lu, D. (2010). A salutary lesson from computer-based self-access language learning project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(4), 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mathews, T. F. & Hansen, C. M. (2004). Ongoing assessment of a university foreign language program. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mazman, S. H. & Usluel, Y. K. (2011). Gender differences in using social networks. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(2), 133–139.Google Scholar
  37. Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The Development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345–368.Google Scholar
  38. Newman, C., Smolen, L., & Lee, D. J. (1995). Implementation of portfolios in an ESL classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  39. Ozturk, H., & Cecen, S. (2007). The effects of portfolio keeping on writing anxiety of EFL students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 3(2), 218–236.Google Scholar
  40. Paesani, K. (2006). “Exercices de style”: Developing multiple competencies through a writing portfolio. Foreign Language Annals, 39(4), 618–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pally, M. (1998). Film studies drive literacy development for ESL university students. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41(8), 20–28.Google Scholar
  42. Papanastasiou, E. C. & Angeli, C. (2008). Evaluating the use of ICT in education: Psychometric properties of the survey of factors affecting teachers teaching with technology (SFA-T3). Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 69–86.Google Scholar
  43. Pascopella, A. & Richardson, W. (2009). The new writing pedagogy. District Administration, 45(10), 44–50.Google Scholar
  44. Pollari, P. (2000). “This is my portfolio”: Portfolios in upper secondary school English studies. Retrieved on 10 March 2012 from (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED450415).Google Scholar
  45. Quan-Haase, A. & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramirez, A., Hine, M., Ji, S., Ulbrich, F. & Riordan, R. (2009). Learning to succeed in a flat world: Information and communication technologies for a new generation of business students. Learning Inquiry, 3Learning Inquiry, 3(3), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robelia, B. A., Greenhow, C. & Burton, L. (2011). Environmental learning in online social networks: Adopting environmentally responsible behaviors. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J. & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: A comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Romano, T. (2009). Defining fun and seeking flow in English language arts. English Journal, 98(6), 30–37.Google Scholar
  50. Ryan, S. D., Magro, M. J. & Sharp, J. H. (2011). Exploring educational and cultural adaptation through social networking sites. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
  51. Schroeder, J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (2009). The Chemistry of Facebook: Using social networking to create an online community for the Organic Chemistry. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4).Google Scholar
  52. Shin, R. (2010). Taking digital creativity to the art classroom: Mystery box swap. Art Education, 63 (2), 38–42.Google Scholar
  53. Siegle, D. (2010). Cyberbullying and sexting: Technology abuses of 21st century. Gifted Child Today, 33(2), 14–16.Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, M. (2008). Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning. Information Science Reference, Hershey, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Trenchs, M. (1996). Writing strategies in a second language: Three case studies of learners using electronic mail. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(3), 464–497.Google Scholar
  56. Walker, A. (2010). Using social networks and ICTs to enhance literature circles: A practical approach. Paper presented at the School Library Association of Queensland and the International Association of School Librarianship Conference, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  57. Waters, J. K. (2009). E-portfolios come of age. T.H.E. Journal, 36(10), 23–29.Google Scholar
  58. West, A., Lewis, J. & Currie, P. (2009). Students’ Facebook “friends”: Public and private spheres. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(6), 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yancey, K. B. (2009). Writing by any other name. Principal Leadership, 10(1), 26–29.Google Scholar
  60. Ybarra, R. & Green, T. (2003). Using technology to help ESL / EFL students develop language skills. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(3). Retrieved on 14 March 2012 from Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Balikesir UniversityBalikesirTurkey

Personalised recommendations