, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 22–27 | Cite as

Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning

  • Selma Koc Vonderwell
  • Marius Boboc


Using effective assessment techniques can improve an instructor’s understanding of student needs and support learner-centered classrooms. Evaluating student learning takes on a new meaning in online classroom environment where students and instructors do not share physical proximity. According to Garrison (2011), the assessment strategies used to determine student learning send “a very strong signal as to what is important and how they should approach learning” (p. 14). This paper describes formative assessment techniques used by two instructors in their respective online courses at the graduate level. The authors give suggestions in designing assessment activities to improve online teaching and learning by making use of student learning data.


Formative Assessment Assessment for Learning Online Learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angelo, T.A., & Cross, P.K. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: a handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Beebe, R., Vonderwell, S., & Boboc, M. (2010). Emerging patterns in transferring assessment practices from face-toface to online environments. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, (8)1.Google Scholar
  3. Benson, A. D. (2003). Assessing participant learning in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 100, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment, Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–148.Google Scholar
  5. Black, P., & William, D. (2004). The formative purpose: Assessment must first promote learning. In Wilson, M. (Ed.), Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability (pp. 20–50). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals - Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: McKay.Google Scholar
  7. Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Retrieved May 10, 2012 from
  8. Chase, C. I. (1999). Contemporary assessment for educators. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, M. (2000). Getting participation through discussion. In S. Haller (Ed.), ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education SIGCSE’00, 32(1), 129–133. New York: ACM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crisp, V., & Ward, C. (2008). The development of a formative scenario-based computer assisted assessment tool in psychology for teachers: The PePCAA project. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1509–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elwood, J., & Klenowski, V. (2002). Creating communities of shared practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Herron, J. F., & Wright, V. H. (2006). Assessment in online learning: Are students really learning? In Wright, H.V., Syzmanski Sunal, C., & Wilson, E. K. (Eds.) Research on enhancing the interactivity of online learning (pp. 45–64). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Liang, X., & Creasy, K. (2004). Classroom assessment in web-based instructional environment: Instructors’ experience. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(7). Retrieved May 2, 2012 from
  15. Mandinach, E. B. (2005). The development of effective evaluation methods for elearning: A concept paper and action plan. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1814–1835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Manning, M. L., & Bucher, K. T. (2005). Teaching in the middle school (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  17. Mosteller, F. (1989). The muddiest point in the lecture’ as a feedback device. On Teaching and Learning: The Journal of the Harvard-Danforth Center, 3, 10–21.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson-LeGall, S. (1981). Help-seeking: An understudied problem-solving skill in children. Developmental Review, 1, 224–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Newman, R. S. (1994). Adaptive help-seeking: A strategy of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 283–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Popham, W. J. (2002). Classroom assessment - What teachers need to know. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  21. Powell, Davis S. (2005). Introduction to middle school. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  22. Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R.B., & Wilson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  23. Vonderwell, S. (2004). Assessing online learning and teaching: Adapting the Minute Paper. TechTrends, 48(4), 29–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213–230.Google Scholar
  25. Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 309–328.Google Scholar
  26. Wilen, W., Hutchinson, J., & Ishler, M. (2008). Dynamics of effective secondary teaching. (6th ed.). Boston, MA: PearsonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Selma Koc Vonderwell
    • 1
  • Marius Boboc
    • 1
  1. 1.Cleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations