, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 54–59 | Cite as

Blending Synchronous Face-to-face and Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning in a Hybrid Doctoral Seminar

  • Cary Roseth
  • Mete Akcaoglu
  • Andrea Zellner


Online education is often assumed to be synonymous with asynchronous instruction, existing apart from or supplementary to face-to-face instruction in traditional bricks-and-mortar classrooms. However, expanding access to computer- mediated communication technologies now make new models possible, including distance learners synchronous online attendance of face-to-face courses. Going beyond traditional uses of videoconferencing (e.g., real-time remote viewing with limited student interaction), this article describes the use of freely available technologies to support synchronous cooperative learning activities involving both face-to-face and hybrid doctoral students. Specifically, we describe the rationale behind pedagogical choices and specify how various technologies were re-purposed to create a virtual classroom space in which all possible combinations of face-to-face and hybrid students worked together in multiple small-groups across single class sessions. Implications for course development, the implementation of cooperative learning activities in online settings, and the use of both synchronous and asynchronous methods of online instruction are discussed.


blended learning distance education online learning computer supported collaborative learning cooperative learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 82103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1984). Systems of student and teacher motivation: Toward a qualitative definition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 535556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewiyanti, S. (2005). Learning together: A positive experience. The effect of reflection on group process in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open Universiteit, Maastricht, Nederland.Google Scholar
  7. Etherpad. (2012, August 1). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:32, September 14, 2012, from
  8. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Psychology Monographs, 131, 285–358.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2008). Cooperation in the classroom (8th ed.) Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
  12. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 10171054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  14. O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 781–802). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Piazza (Q&A platform). (2012, July 26). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:49, September 14, 2012, from
  16. Reich, J., Murnane, R. & Willett, J. (2012). The state of wiki usage in US K–12 schools: Leveraging web 2.0 data warehouses to assess quality and equity in online learning environments. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Resta, P., & Laferriere, T. (2007). Technology in support of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 6583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roseth, C. J., Saltarelli, A. J., & Glass, C. R. (2011). Effects of face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy on social interdependence, motivation, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 804820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saltarelli, A. J., & Roseth, C. J. (under review). Effects of belongingness and synchronicity on face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy.Google Scholar
  21. Slavin, R. E. (1995) Cooperative learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Smith, B., & McCallister, M. (2012). Wordpress in depth. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  22. Teras, H. & Teras, M. (2012). Using Google tools for authentic learning and progressive inquiry in 21st century faculty development. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cary Roseth
    • 1
  • Mete Akcaoglu
    • 1
  • Andrea Zellner
    • 1
  1. 1.Michigan State UniversityMichiganUSA

Personalised recommendations