Blending Synchronous Face-to-face and Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning in a Hybrid Doctoral Seminar
- 762 Downloads
Online education is often assumed to be synonymous with asynchronous instruction, existing apart from or supplementary to face-to-face instruction in traditional bricks-and-mortar classrooms. However, expanding access to computer- mediated communication technologies now make new models possible, including distance learners synchronous online attendance of face-to-face courses. Going beyond traditional uses of videoconferencing (e.g., real-time remote viewing with limited student interaction), this article describes the use of freely available technologies to support synchronous cooperative learning activities involving both face-to-face and hybrid doctoral students. Specifically, we describe the rationale behind pedagogical choices and specify how various technologies were re-purposed to create a virtual classroom space in which all possible combinations of face-to-face and hybrid students worked together in multiple small-groups across single class sessions. Implications for course development, the implementation of cooperative learning activities in online settings, and the use of both synchronous and asynchronous methods of online instruction are discussed.
Keywordsblended learning distance education online learning computer supported collaborative learning cooperative learning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Dewiyanti, S. (2005). Learning together: A positive experience. The effect of reflection on group process in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open Universiteit, Maastricht, Nederland.Google Scholar
- Etherpad. (2012, August 1). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:32, September 14, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Etherpad&oldid=505283415
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Psychology Monographs, 131, 285–358.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2008). Cooperation in the classroom (8th ed.) Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
- Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 781–802). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Piazza (Q&A platform). (2012, July 26). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 00:49, September 14, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Piazza_(Q%26A_platform)&oldid=504211651
- Saltarelli, A. J., & Roseth, C. J. (under review). Effects of belongingness and synchronicity on face-to-face and computer-mediated constructive controversy.Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. (1995) Cooperative learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Smith, B., & McCallister, M. (2012). Wordpress in depth. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Teras, H. & Teras, M. (2012). Using Google tools for authentic learning and progressive inquiry in 21st century faculty development. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/39754.