, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 20–25 | Cite as

Situated Learning with Online Portfolios, Classroom Websites and Facebook

  • Chris ShaltryEmail author
  • Danah Henriksen
  • Min Lun Wu
  • W. Patrick Dickson
Teaching Pre-Service Teachers to Integrate Technology:


In this article we describe the evolution of an elective course designed specifically for undergraduate students in our pre-service teacher education program. This course is intended to prepare these undergraduate students as future teachers—helping them to make effective and creative uses of technology in learning settings. This course emphasizes learning to learn with and about technology, in the ever-changing context of educational technology. Generally speaking, we outline and describe three key goals of teaching young teachers to thoughtfully integrate technology into a real-world classroom. First, the course emphasizes learning to explore and learn proactively by engaging in learning by design activities. Second, students are given an opportunity to try a wide variety of innovative technologies through explorations of their own choosing. Finally, we attempt to leverage the power of online community building for learning by harnessing the ubiquity and convenience of tools like Facebook. We look into the future with great hope and enthusiasm that our preservice teachers will lead the way in integrating new technologies into their teaching in ways that will benefit their students, colleagues, and the greater education community.


creativity educational technology courses future teachers e-portfolios learning by design online communities pre-service teachers social media technology integration website design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bauer, J. & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t Happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frank, K. Zhao, Y., & Boreman, K. (2004). Social Capital and the Implementation of Computers in Schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Granger, C. A., Morbey, M. L., Lotherington, H., Owston, R. D., & Wideman, H. H. (2002). Factors contributing to teachers’ successful implementation of IT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(4), 480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gulbahar, Y (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4). 943–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hampton, K., Goulet, L., Rainie, L., Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  8. Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers and Education, 58(1), 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kardos, S., & Moore Johnson, S. (2007). On their own and presumed expert: New teachers’ experience with their colleagues. The Teachers College Record, 109(9), 2083–2106.Google Scholar
  10. Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Eduation, 38(4), 383–408.Google Scholar
  11. Koehler, M. J. & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 32(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambert, J., Gong, Y., & Cuper, P. (2008). Technology, transfer, and teaching: The impact of a single technology course on preservice teachers’ computer attitudes and ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 385–410.Google Scholar
  13. Michigan State Board of Education (2008). Professional Standards for Michigan Teachers. Retrieved January 9, 2012.
  14. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the tpack framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11(2), 22–28.Google Scholar
  16. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools: The Center Madison, Wis.Google Scholar
  17. Peppler, K. & Kafai, Y. B. (2010). Gaming Fluencies: Pathways into a Participatory Culture in a Community Design Studio. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  18. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Resnick, L. B. (1987). The 1987 presidential address: learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–54.Google Scholar
  20. Thompson, A., & Mishra, P. (2007–2008). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24 (2), 38–64.Google Scholar
  21. Thompson, P., (2012). “The Popular Profile of the Digital Learner: Technology use Patterns and Approaches to Learning.” Michigan State University, 2012. United States. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D.,Google Scholar
  22. Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.Google Scholar
  23. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J.(2005). Understanding by Design. Expanded 2nd Ed. USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Shaltry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Danah Henriksen
    • 1
  • Min Lun Wu
    • 1
  • W. Patrick Dickson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Special EducationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations