Advertisement

TechTrends

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 17–19 | Cite as

The Educational Technology Program at Michigan State University

  • By Punya Mishra, Laura Terry and Danah Henriksen, Michigan State University
Introduction to the Spotlight Issue:
  • 146 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AACTE (2008). AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (tpck) for educators (pp. 3–29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.Google Scholar
  2. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as Experience. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  3. Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2010, Winter). On learning to subvert signs: Literacy, technology and the TPACK framework. The California Reader, 44(2), 12–18.Google Scholar
  4. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Bouck, E., De-Schryver, M., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Wolf, L. G. (2011). Deep-play: Developing TPACK for 21st century teachers. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6(2), 146–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mishra, P., and Koehler, M. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017 – 1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mishra, P., and Koehler, M. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Paper presented at the American Educational Association Research Conference. Google Scholar
  7. Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., & Terry, L., (2012). What would John Dewey Do: Programmatic design for developing TPACK for 21st Century Learning. Symposium presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education Conference (March 2012). Google Scholar
  8. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., Zellner, A., & Kereluik, K. (2012). Thematic considerations in integrating TPACK into a graduate program. In D. Polly, C. Mims, & K. Persichitte (Eds.),Creating technologyrich teacher education programs: Key issues. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  9. Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., Henriksen, D. & the Deep-Play Research Group (2013). Creativity, self directed learning, and the architecture of technology rich environments. Tech Trends, (57) 1. p. 10–13.Google Scholar
  10. Papert, S. & Harel, I. (eds). (1991) Constructionism: research reports and essays 1985–1990 by The Epistemology and Learning Research Group, the Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  11. Perkins, D.N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Perkins, D.N. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Wolf, L.G. (2011). Quality and Relevance: Evaluating a Master’s Program in Educational Technology. (Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and ThesesGoogle Scholar
  15. Wong, E. D., Pugh, K. J., & The Dewey Ideas Group at Michigan State University. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. The Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • By Punya Mishra, Laura Terry and Danah Henriksen, Michigan State University

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations