Skip to main content

The Creative Spirit of Design

Abstract

If instructional designers hold limited views about their practice they sometimes adopt formulaic routines that do not help them accomplish the goals they believe are important, or develop instruction of a quality envisioned by the field’s innovative theorists. Fortunately, designers can avoid these unfavorable results in part by understanding and exemplifying the creative spirit of design. In this article the author examines the creative spirit of design, exploring its imaginative, creation-oriented, and inter-disciplinary character. The author also describes how the creative spirit can help instructional designers remain flexible and perceptive in their practice, and by so doing be better able to create effective and innovative instruction of a quality consistent with their ultimate ideals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Brooks Jr., F. P. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Birkhäuser Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K. (1978). Educa tional technology: Archetypes, paradigms, and models. In J. Hartley & I. K. Davies (Eds.), Contributions to an educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 9–24). New York: Crane, Russak & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler, N. (2006). Walt Disney: The triumph of the American imagination. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends, 47(5), 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S., & Brewer, E. K. (2005). Elementary principles of design languages and design notation systems for instructional design. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 111–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. S., & Yanchar, S. C. (2010). An alternative view of the instructional design process: A response to Smith and Boling. Educational Technology, 50(4), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzfeld, A. (2005). Revolution in the valley: The insanely great story of how the Mac was made. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson, B., & Miller, C. (2009). Role-based design: A contemporary framework for innovation and creativity in instructional design. Educational Technology, 49(2), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson, B., Miller, C., & Hooper, S. (2008). Role-based design: A contemporary perspective for innovation in instructional design. TechTrends, 52(6), 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye, D. K., Merrill, P. F., & Swan, R. H. (2005). Help: Toward a new ethics-centered paradigm for instructional design and technology. IDT Record. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~idt/articles/documents/Inouye_print_version.pdf

  • Kelley, T. (2001). Prototyping is the shorthand of innovation. Design Management Review, 12(3), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, T. (Ed.). (2010). Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. K. (2010). Resisting technological gravity: Using guiding principles for instructional design. Educational Technology, 50(2), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. K., & Gibbons, A. S. (2009). Technology I, II, and III: Criteria for understanding and improving the practice of instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osguthorpe, R. T., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2007). Instructional design as a living practice: Toward a conscience of craft. Educational Technology, 47(4), 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. A. (2008). The Pixar touch: The making of a company. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Sutton, R., & Webb, A. P. (2008). Innovation lessons from Pixar: An interview with oscar-winning director Brad Bird. The McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Innovation_lessons_from_Pixar_An_interview_with_Oscarwinning_director_Brad_Bird_2127

  • Smith, K. M., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason K. McDonald.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonald, J.K. The Creative Spirit of Design. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 55, 53 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0528-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0528-2

Keywords

  • creativity
  • innovation
  • instructional design
  • design