TechTrends

, 55:53 | Cite as

The Creative Spirit of Design

Article

Abstract

If instructional designers hold limited views about their practice they sometimes adopt formulaic routines that do not help them accomplish the goals they believe are important, or develop instruction of a quality envisioned by the field’s innovative theorists. Fortunately, designers can avoid these unfavorable results in part by understanding and exemplifying the creative spirit of design. In this article the author examines the creative spirit of design, exploring its imaginative, creation-oriented, and inter-disciplinary character. The author also describes how the creative spirit can help instructional designers remain flexible and perceptive in their practice, and by so doing be better able to create effective and innovative instruction of a quality consistent with their ultimate ideals.

Keywords

creativity innovation instructional design design 

References

  1. Brooks Jr., F. P. (2010). The design of design: Essays from a computer scientist. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  3. Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Birkhäuser Basel.Google Scholar
  4. Davies, I. K. (1978). Educa tional technology: Archetypes, paradigms, and models. In J. Hartley & I. K. Davies (Eds.), Contributions to an educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 9–24). New York: Crane, Russak & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Gabler, N. (2006). Walt Disney: The triumph of the American imagination. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  6. Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? A theory of design structure. TechTrends, 47(5), 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibbons, A. S., & Brewer, E. K. (2005). Elementary principles of design languages and design notation systems for instructional design. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. Van Schaack & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 111–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Gibbons, A. S., & Yanchar, S. C. (2010). An alternative view of the instructional design process: A response to Smith and Boling. Educational Technology, 50(4), 16–26.Google Scholar
  9. Hargadon, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 716–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hertzfeld, A. (2005). Revolution in the valley: The insanely great story of how the Mac was made. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Hokanson, B., & Miller, C. (2009). Role-based design: A contemporary framework for innovation and creativity in instructional design. Educational Technology, 49(2), 21–28.Google Scholar
  12. Hokanson, B., Miller, C., & Hooper, S. (2008). Role-based design: A contemporary perspective for innovation in instructional design. TechTrends, 52(6), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inouye, D. K., Merrill, P. F., & Swan, R. H. (2005). Help: Toward a new ethics-centered paradigm for instructional design and technology. IDT Record. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~idt/articles/documents/Inouye_print_version.pdf
  14. Kelley, T. (2001). Prototyping is the shorthand of innovation. Design Management Review, 12(3), 35–42.Google Scholar
  15. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Lockwood, T. (Ed.). (2010). Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York: Allworth Press.Google Scholar
  18. McDonald, J. K. (2010). Resisting technological gravity: Using guiding principles for instructional design. Educational Technology, 50(2), 8–13.Google Scholar
  19. McDonald, J. K., & Gibbons, A. S. (2009). Technology I, II, and III: Criteria for understanding and improving the practice of instructional technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(3), 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Osguthorpe, R. D. (2007). Instructional design as a living practice: Toward a conscience of craft. Educational Technology, 47(4), 13–23.Google Scholar
  22. Price, D. A. (2008). The Pixar touch: The making of a company. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  23. Rao, H., Sutton, R., & Webb, A. P. (2008). Innovation lessons from Pixar: An interview with oscar-winning director Brad Bird. The McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Innovation_lessons_from_Pixar_An_interview_with_Oscarwinning_director_Brad_Bird_2127
  24. Smith, K. M., & Boling, E. (2009). What do we make of design? Design as a concept in educational technology. Educational Technology, 49(4), 3–17.Google Scholar
  25. van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LDS Motion Picture StudioSalt LakeUSA

Personalised recommendations