, 55:45 | Cite as

Understanding Technology Literacy: A Framework for Evaluating Educational Technology Integration

  • Randall S. Davies


Federal legislation in the United States currently mandates that technology be integrated into school curricula because of the popular belief that learning is enhanced through the use of technology. The challenge for educators is to understand how best to teach with technology while developing the technological expertise of their students. This article outlines a framework of technological literacy designed to help educators understand, evaluate, and promote effective and appropriate technology integration.


Technology Integration Technology Literacy Educational Technology 


  1. Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519–546.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess-Limerick, R., Abernathy, B., & Limerick, B. (1994). Identification of underlying assumptions is an integral part of research: An example from motor control. Theory & Psychology, 4, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies, R., & Linton , J. (2008a). Understanding Dispositional Dissonance. Paper presented at the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts & Letters Annual Meeting at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.Google Scholar
  4. Davies, R., Sprague, C., & New, C. (2008b) Integrating Technology into a Science Classroom: An evaluation of inquiry-based technology integration. In D.W. Sunal, E. L. Wright, & C. Sundberg (Eds.), The Impact of Technology and the Laboratory on K-16 Science Learning series: Research in Science Education (pp. 207–237).Google Scholar
  5. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc. Eisenberg, M.B., & Johnson, D. (2002) Learning and teaching information technology: Computer skills in context. ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 465377.Google Scholar
  6. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall, B., & Khan, B. (2003). Adoption of new technology. NBER Working Paper. Retrieved from = 410656.
  8. Hansen, J. W. (2003) To change perceptions of technology programs. Journal of Technology Studies, 29, 1619. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for students. Retrieved from
  9. International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers. Retrieved from
  10. Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(1), 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leu, D.J. (2006). New literacies, reading research, and the challenges of change: A Deictic perspective. (NRC Presidential Address). In J. Hoffman, D. Schallert, C. M. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, & B. Maloch (Eds.) The 55th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. (1–20). Milwaukee, WI: National Reading Conference.Google Scholar
  12. McMillan, S. (1996). Literacy and computer literacy: Definitions and comparisons. Computer & Education, 27(3–4), 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McMillan-Culp, K., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of educational technology policy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2009). Measurement and assessment in teaching (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogicalcontent knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroomtechnology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(4), 40–42. Retrieved from
  17. National Research Council Committee on Information Technology Literacy. (1999). Being fluent with information technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Peck, C., Cuban, L., & Kirkpatrick, H. (2003). High-tech’s high hopes meet student realities. Education Digest, 67(8), 47–54.Google Scholar
  19. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (ed.), The handbook of research in teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119), New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  21. Rogers, P. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(4), 455–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation . Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Technology in Schools Task Force. (2002). Technology in schools: Suggestions, tools, and guidelines for assessing technology in elementary and secondary education. Retrieved from
  24. Topper, A. (2004). How are we doing? Using self-assessment to measure changing teacher technology literacy within a graduate educational technology program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 303–317.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of Education (2001). Enhancing Education Through Technology, SEC. 2402 - purposes and goals. Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Retrieved from
  26. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002). No child left behind: A desktop reference. Retrieved from
  27. Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational Psychology, (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations