Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional Design as Critical and Creative Thinking: A Journey Through a Jamestown-Era Native American Village

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of critical and creative thinking has been debated within the field of instructional design. Through an instructional design and development project we have identified how critical and creative thinking are essential to the instructional design process. This paper highlights a recent project focused on a virtual Native American village and the development of supporting instructional materials. The materials combine instruction on content-area material, technology and critical and creative thinking skills. Our concept of critical and creative thinking skills is guided by a model that includes idea generation, reflective judgment, attitudes and dispositions and self-regulation. Through the process of designing instruction to teach critical and creative thinking skills, we recognized that these critical and creative thinking skills are essential in the design process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, L.M., Cennamo, K.S. & Newbill, P.L. (2009). Developing critical and creative thinkers. Educational Technology, 49(5), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. (2005). Teaching Students to Think Critically. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 70(6), 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats: An essential approach to business management. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. (1995a). Instructional design and creativity: A response to the critics. Educational Technology, 35(4), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. (1995b). Response to Gordon Rowland on “Instructional design and creativity.” Educational Technology, 35(5), 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 142–151). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. (1987). Creativity research: Past, present, and future. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 33–65). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson, B., Miller, C., & Hooper, S. (2008). Role-based design: A contemporary perspective for innovation in instructional design. TechTrends 52(6), 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., & Arredondo, D. E. (1986). Restructuring schools through the teaching of thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(8), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B. Z., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1988). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Kinds of thinking taught in current programs. Educational Leadership, 42(1), 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for 21st century skills. (2004). The partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved January 12, 2008, from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/

  • Raths, L. E., Wassermann, S., Jonas, A., & Rothstein, A. M. (1986). Teaching for thinking: Theory, strategies, and activities for the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G. (1995). Instructional design and creativity: A response to the criticized. Educational Technology, 35(5), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starko, A. J. (2005). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liesl M. Baum and Phyllis Leary Newbill. Instructional Design as Critical and Creative Thinking: A Journey Through a Jamestown-Era Native American Village. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 54, 27–37 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-010-0434-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-010-0434-z

Keywords

Navigation