Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Labels DO Matter! A Critique of AECT’s Redefinition of the Field

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

AECT has recently (yet again!) redefined our field, reverting back to the use of the term educational technology. We believe this recent change is problematic for a number of reasons, but primarily because of the weak rationale offered for the change. This change affects how external audiences view our profession and is likely to confuse practitioners in corporate and higher education settings in particular. We offer a review of job postings, program titles, and listserv discussions to support our case. The labels we use to define ourselves are critically important - and we hope to see a stronger case made for changes for our foundational definitions in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lowenthal, P., Wilson, B.G. Labels DO Matter! A Critique of AECT’s Redefinition of the Field. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 54, 38–46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0362-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0362-y

Keywords

Navigation