Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Homemade PowerPoint Games: A Constructionist Alternative to WebQuests

  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambron, J. (1987) Writing to improve learning in biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 16(4), 263–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J., & Street, M. (2007). The quest for deeper learning: An investigation into the impact of a knowledge-pooling WebQuest in primary initial teacher training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1102–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbitt, J., & Ophus, J. (2008). What we know about the impacts of WebQuests: A review of Research. AACE Journal, 16(4), 441–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. K., Thomas, G. B., Rauscher, D., & Rieber, L. P. (in press). Homemade Power-Point games: Preparing the next generation of teachers to use creative design activities in the classroom. In A Hirumi (Ed.), Digital video games for PreK-12 education: Engaging learners through interactive entertainment. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

  • Bell, L., Schrum, L., Thompson, A., & Bull, G. (2008). Introduction. In L. Bell & A. Thompson (Eds.), Framing research on technology and student learning in the content areas: Implications for teacher educators (pp. 1–12). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthoff, A. (1982). Forming/thinking/writing. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palinscar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charsky, D. G. (2004). Evaluation of the effectiveness of integrating concept maps and computer games to teach historical understanding. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO.

  • Griffin, C. (1983). Using writing to teach many disciplines. Improving College and University Teaching, 31(3). 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, J., Lucassen, B., Gilley, W., & Rasmussen, K. (1993–1994). Since Malone’s theory of intrinsically motivating instruction: What’s the score in the gaming literature? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 22(2), 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskill, M., McNulty, A., & Brooks, D. W. (2006). Learning from WebQuests. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 133–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M. E. (2003). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 571–581). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 1, 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harel, I., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, P. (1999). Designing computer models that teach. In W. Feurzeig & N. Roberts (Eds.), Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education (pp. 179–196). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. (1994). Electronic play worlds: Children’s construction of video games. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Rethinking the roles of technology in learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. (1995). Minds in play: Computer game design as a context for children’s learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students’ science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(3), 323–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., Ching, C., & Marshall, S. (1997). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers and Education, 29, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., & Harel, I. (1991). Learning through design and teaching: Exploring social and collaborative aspects of constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 85–106). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. D., & Pittendrigh, A. S. (1984). A writing teacher in the physics classroom. The Physics Teacher, 22, 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature review in games and learning: A report for NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved on September 1, 2004 from http://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/reviews/08_01.htm

  • McDivitt, D. (2006). Making a game of it. T.H.E. Journal, 33(17), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (1993). Does writing about science improve learning about science? Journal of College Science Teaching, 22(4), 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (1994). Writing to learn biology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimes, A. (1980). Writing and learning across the curriculum: The experience of a college faculty seminar. College English, 41 (7). 797–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickards, J. P., & DiVesta, F. J. (1974). Type and frequency of questions in processing textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(3), 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P. (2001). Designing learning environments that excite serious play. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the crossroads. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 1–10). Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, The University of Melbourne. [Online]. Available: http://www.nowhereroad.com/seriousplay/Rieber-ASCILITEseriousplay.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P., Barbour, M., Thomas, G., & Rauscher, D. (2008). Learning by designing games: Homemade PowerPoint games. In C. T. Miller (Ed.), Games: Their purpose and potential in education (pp. 23–42). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P., Davis, J. M., Matzko, M. J., & Grant, M. M. (2009). Children as critics of educational computer games designed by other children. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (pp. 1234–1256). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P., Luke, N., & Smith, J. (1998). Project KID DESIGNER: Constructivism at work through play. Meridian: Middle School Computer Technology Journal, 1(1), [On-line]. Available http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/jan98/index.html.

  • Rieber, L. P., Barbour, M. K., Thomas, G. B., & Rauscher, D. (2008). Learning by designing games: Homemade PowerPoint games. In C. T. Miller (Ed.), Games: Their purpose and potential in education (pp. 23–42). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., & Stroup, W. (2000). SimCalc: Accelerating student engagement with the mathematics of change. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Learning the sciences of the 21st century: Research, design, and implementing advanced technology learning environments (pp. 47–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, K. D. (2004). Replaying History. Unpublished Dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

  • Strickland, J., & Nazzal, A. (2005). Using Web-Quests to teach content: Comparing instructional strategies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol5/iss2/socialstudies/article1.cfm

  • Teague, M., & Teague, G. (1995). Planning with computers - A social studies simulation. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(1), 20, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidoni, K. L., & Maddux, C. D. (2002). Web-Quests: Can they be used to improve critical thinking skills in students? Computers in the Schools, 19, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Integrating WebQuests in preservice teacher education. Educational Media International, 45(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (2000). Technological tools and instructional approaches for making scientific inquiry accessible to all. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 321–359). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Work, J. C. (1979). Reducing three papers to ten: A method in literature courses. In G. Stanford (ed.), How to handle the paper load: Classroom practices in teaching English (pp. 80–88). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Homemade PowerPoint Games: A Constructionist Alternative to WebQuests. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 53, 54–59 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0326-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0326-2

Search

Navigation