TechTrends

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 16–24 | Cite as

Examining PT3 Projects Designed to Improve Preservice Education

  • Clif Mims
  • Drew Polly
  • Craig Shepherd
  • Fethi Inan

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, C. A. (1983). Computer literacy: Changes for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(5), 6–9.Google Scholar
  2. Barron, A. E., Hogarty, K. Y., Kromrey, J. D., & Lenkway, P. (1999). An examination of the relationships between student conduct and the number of computers per student in Florida schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 98–107.Google Scholar
  3. Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vannatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 105–127.Google Scholar
  4. Boccia, J. (2003). Ready To Teach (RTT) project final report. Lowell, MA: University of Massachusetts at Lowell.Google Scholar
  5. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M. H., Stock, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology into a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57–72.Google Scholar
  8. Claxton, D., & Bedford, J. (2003). East Central University PT3 project annual report. Ada, OK: East Central University, School of Education and Psychology.Google Scholar
  9. Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. CognitionandTechnologyGroupatVanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. DePaepe, J. (2005). Enhancing the technological proficiencies of educators though community-based research. Ellensburg, WA: Central Washington University, College of Education and Professional Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Diggs, L, Laffey, J., Wedman, J., & Marra, R. (2001). University of Missouri PT3 project final report. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri.Google Scholar
  13. Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
  14. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, C., Culatta, R., Pratt, M., & West, R. (2004). Redesigning the teacher education technology course to emphasize integration. Computers in the Schools, 21, 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hannafin, M. J. (1992). Emerging technologies, ISD, and learning environments: Critical perspectives. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howland, J., & Wedman, J. (2004). A process model for faculty development: Individualized technology learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 239–263.Google Scholar
  19. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000a). National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETSS). Eugene, OR: Author.Google Scholar
  20. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000b). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (NETST). Eugene, OR: Author.Google Scholar
  21. Jenkins, T. (2005). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to use technology: Final performance report. Plano, TX: Collin County Community College.Google Scholar
  22. Jonas, R. (2004). The University of Mary PT3 Project final report. Bismarck, ND: The University of Mary.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, D. L., & Paolucci, R. (1999). Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 17–27.Google Scholar
  24. Krueger, K., Boboc, M., Smaldino, S., Cornish, Y., & Callahan, W. (2004). InTime impact report: What was InTime’s effectiveness and impact on faculty and preservice teachers? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 185–210.Google Scholar
  25. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lowther, D. L., Bassoppo-Moya, T., & Morrison, G. R. (1998). Moving from computer literate to technologically competent: The next educational reform. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ludwig, M., & Booz, W. H. (2001). Teacher technology leaders. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.Google Scholar
  28. Ludwig, M, & Booz, W. H. (2002). Teacher technology leaders. Washington, DC: George Washington University, Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.Google Scholar
  29. Mills, S. (2003). Pittsburg State University PT3 project final report. Pittsburg, KS: Pittsburg State University.Google Scholar
  30. Millken Family Foundation (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
  31. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (Eds.). (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). (2000). Revisioning professional development: What learner-centered professional development looks like. Oxford, OH: Author.Google Scholar
  33. Nave, B. (2004). Boston University Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers for Technology (BUPT3): Final summative report. Boston, MA: Boston University, School of Education.Google Scholar
  34. Norris, C., Smolka, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Extracting value from research: A guide for the perplexed. Technology & Learning, 20(11), 45–48.Google Scholar
  35. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers & technology: Making the connection Washington, DC: U.S. Congress. (ERIC Document OTA-EHR-616)Google Scholar
  36. Paige, J. R. (2004). St. Edward’s University PT3 project final report. Austin, TX: St. Edward’s University.Google Scholar
  37. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Persichitte, K. A., Tharp, D. D., & Caffarella, E. P. (1997). The use of technology by schools, colleges, and departments of education: Fall, 1996. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  39. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teaching? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Resta, P. E., Petrosino, A., & Confrey, J. (2004). Inventing new strategies for integrating technology into education: Project INSITE evaluation report. Austin, TX: University of Texas–Austin.Google Scholar
  41. Salinas, S. E. (2000, April). Exploring motivational factors in technology standards integration with a preservice educator: An action research inquiry. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  42. Schank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1995). Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Schrum, L. (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snow, S. S., & Millar, D. (2003). Saginaw Valley State University PT3 Project final report. Saginaw, MI: Saginaw Valley State University.Google Scholar
  45. Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D., & Weiss, R. (2003). Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 41–56.Google Scholar
  46. Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D. & Weiss, R. (2004). Final report for Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Las Vegas, NE: University of Nevada–Las Vegas.Google Scholar
  47. Swain, C., & Dawson, K. (2003). The University of Florida Teaching and Technology Initiative (UFTTI) PT3 implementation grant final report. Gainesville, FL: The University of Florida.Google Scholar
  48. Tiene, D., & Luft, P. (2001). Teaching in a technology-rich classroom. Educational Leadership, 41(4), 23–31.Google Scholar
  49. United States Department of Education (USDoE) (2004). Preparing tomorrow’s teachers to teach with technology. Retrieved January 20, 2006, from http://www.pt3.org
  50. Vetter, R., Sologuk, S., & Stammen, R. (2001). A collaborative approach for creating curriculum and instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 199–210.Google Scholar
  51. Waddoups, G. L., Wentworth, N., & Earle, R. (2004). Principles of technology integration and curriculum development: A faculty design team approach. Computers in the Schools, 21, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wakabayashi, I. (1997). From internet user to cyberspace citizen. Educom Review, 32, 46–55.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, Y. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Preservice teachers’ perception of the teacher’s role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Teacher Education, 35, 150–161.Google Scholar
  54. Wentworth, N., Waddoups, G. L., & Earle, R. (2004). Technology integration into a teacher education program. Computers in the Schools, 21, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clif Mims
  • Drew Polly
  • Craig Shepherd
  • Fethi Inan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations