This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Borich, G. D. (2000). Effective teaching methods (44th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1984). Teacher behavior and student achievement. Occasional paper no. 73. East Lansing, MI: East Lansing Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
Charles, D. F. (1991). Implementing a program using zoological treasure hunt to enhance word attack skills of low performing first grade students. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Nova University. (ERICDocument Reproduction Service No. ED 338 584)
Christie, K. (2001). Oh, no! not Texas again! Phi Delta Kappan, 83(1), 5–6.
Clark, K. D. (2000). Urban middle school teachers’ use of instructional technology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 178–196.
Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L., Taylor, R., Bottage, B., & Daley, D. (1997). The computer doesn’t embarrass me. Educational Leadership, 55(3), 30–33.
Kajder, S. B. (2003). The tech-savvy English classroom. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
Maslin, J. E., & Nelson, M. E. (2002). Peering into the future: Students using technology to create literacy products. The Reading Teacher, 55(7), 628–639.
Merkley, D. J., Schmidt, D. A., & Allen, G. (2001). Addressing the English language arts technology standard in a secondary reading methodology course. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(3), 220–231.
National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Retrieved January 10, 2005, from http://www.ncte.org/edpolicy/quality
Norris, C., Soloway, E., & Sullivan, T. (2002). Examining 25 years of technology in U.S. education. Communications of the ACM, 45(8), 15–18.
Potter, L., & Small, J. (1998). Utilizing computers for reading improvement in a junior high: A case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(4), 383–387.
Riley, R. W., Holleman, F. S., & Roberts, L. G. (2000). The national educational technology plan: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Shiah, R. L., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. (1995). Computer-assited instruction and students with learning disabilities: Does research support the rhetoric? Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 9, 161–192.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). Enhancing Education Through Technology Act of 2001. Retrieved April 25, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg34.html
Wepner, S. B., & Tao, L. (2002). From master teacher to master novice: Shifting responsibilities in technology-infused classrooms. Reading Teacher, 55(7), 642–652.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.
Dr. Robert M. Maninger is an instructor of technology applications in the School of Education at Texas Christian University. His interests include technology integration, educational foundations and school administration. Dr. Maninger has taught at the secondary and university level, and has been both an elementary and secondary administrator.
About this article
Cite this article
Maninger, R.M. Student Test Scores Improved in an English Literature Course through the Use of Supportive Devices. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 50, 37–45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0045-x
- Technology Integration
- Passing Rate
- Reading Test
- TechTrends Volume
- Remote Device