Abstract
In this first cross-linguistic study of the emergence and early development of synthetic compounds we present the strictly parallel analysis of systematically collected longitudinal data from seven languages: the Finno-Ugric languages Finnish, Saami, Estonian and the Indo-European languages Lithuanian, Russian, Greek and German. The data of spontaneous interactions between children and parents allow insights usually not obtainable via transversal formal tests. For example, the target of acquisition is the specific parental child-directed speech and not the target languages as represented in grammars, dictionaries and adult electronic corpora.
The distribution, dates and orders of emergence of various formal and semantic subtypes of synthetic compounds, i.e. instrument, agent, result, action, local deverbal synthetic compounds, differs among the languages studied. These differences are better explained by the relative richness of patterns of synthetic compounds than by other typological criteria such as belonging to, or approaching, the agglutinating vs. the inflecting-fusional language type.
The analyses offer support for a building-block model of the rise of morphological complexity, for synthetic compounds being taken up by children as compounds and not as derivations, but being more complex than other types of compounds. Thus, synthetic compounds become productive later than nominal compounds in general.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Notes
With the exception of a single lemma, personal communication by Laila Kjærbæk, University of Southern Denmark, Odense.
References
Alexiadou, A., & Rathert, M. (Eds.) (2010). The semantics of nominalizations across languages and frameworks. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Argus, R., & Kazakovskaya, V. V. (2013). Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics, 9, 23–42.
Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berman, R. A. (2004). Between emergence and mastery: The long developmental route of language acquisition. In R. A. Berman (Ed.), Language childhood and adolescence (pp. 9–34). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U., & Kilani-Schoch, M. (Eds.) (2003). Development of verb inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, H. (2013). Structuring sense, Vol. III: Taking form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brisard, F., Laarman, E., & Nicoladis, E. (2008). Clausal order and the acquisition of Dutch deverbal compounds. Morphology, 18, 143–166.
Bybee, J. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, E. V. (1998). Morphology in language acquisition. In A. Spencer & A. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of morphology (pp. 374–389). Oxford: Blackwell.
Clark, E. V., & Hecht, B. F. (1982). Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition, 12, 1–24.
Clark, E. V., Hecht, B. F., & Mulford, R. C. (1986). Acquiring complex compounds: Affixes and word order in English. Linguistics, 24, 7–29.
Dabašinskienė, I., & Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, L. (2017). The early production of compounds in Lithuanian. In W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez, & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Nominal compound acquisition (pp. 145–163). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dalalakis, J. E. (1999). Morphological representation in specific language impairment: Evidence from Greek. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 51, 20–35.
Donalies, E. (2001). Zur Entrümpelung vorgeschlagen: Die Wortbildungsarten Rückbildung, Zusammenbildung, Zusammenrückung, Klammerform und Pseudomotivierung. Studia Germanica Universitatis Vesprimiensis, 5, 129–145.
Dressler, W. U. (1999). On a semiotic theory of preferences in language. Peirce Seminar Papers, 4, 389–415.
Dressler, W. U. (2005). Word-formation in natural morphology. In P. Stekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 267–284). New York: Springer.
Dressler, W. U. (2007). Productivity in word formation. In G. Jarema & G. Libben (Eds.), The mental lexicon: Core perspectives (pp. 159–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dressler, W. U. (2011). The rise of complexity in inflectional morphology. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47, 159–176.
Dressler, W. U., Ketrez, F. N., & Kilani-Schoch, M. (Eds.) (2017). Nominal compound acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (Ed.) (2014) Poznan studies in contemporary linguistics, Vol. 50; Special volume on linguistic complexity: Editor’s preface (pp. 123–125).
Fellner, H. A., & Grestenberger, L. (2016). Greek and Latin verbal governing compounds in *-ā and their prehistory. In B. Simmelkjær, S. Hansen, B. N. Whitehead, T. Olander, & B. A. Olsen (Eds.), Etymology and the European lexicon (pp. 135–149). Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Gaeta, L. (2010). Synthetic compounds. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 219–236). Amsterdam: Benjamins. With special reference to German.
Gamache, J., & Schmitt, C. (2014). Compounds, learning mechanisms, and the continuity hypothesis in language acquisition. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 20, 110–118.
Griffin, Z. M. (2002). Recency effects for meaning and form in word selection. Brain and Language, 80, 465–487.
Haarmann, H. (2004). Elementare Wortordnung in den Sprachen der Welt: Dokumentation und Analysen zur Entstehung von Wortfolgemustern. Hamburg: Buske.
Iordăchioaia, G., Alexiadou, A., & Pairamidis, A. (2017). Morphosyntactic sources for nominal synthetic compounds in English and Greek. Journal of Word-Formation, 1, 47–71.
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und Allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Kazakovskaya, V. V. (2017). Acquisition of nominal compounds in Russian. In W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez, & M. Kilani-Schoch (Eds.), Nominal compound acquisition (pp. 63–90). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kirk, C., & Demuth, K. (2005). Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language, 31(4), 709–734.
Köpcke, K.-M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: Schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language, 25, 293–319.
Lieber, R. (2010). On the lexical semantics of compounds: non-affixal (de)verbal compounds. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel (Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding (pp. 127–144). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lieber, R. (2016). On the interplay of facts and theory: Revisiting synthetic compounds in English. In D. Siddiqi & H. Harley (Eds.), Morphological metatheory (pp. 513–536). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Meibauer, J. (1999). Über Nomen–Verb-Beziehungen im frühen Wortbildungserwerb. In J. Meibauer & M. Rothweiler (Eds.), Das Lexikon im Spracherwerb, Tübingen: Francke (pp. 184–207).
Meibauer, J., & Vogel, P. M. (2017). Preface of the special issue: Zusammenbildungen/Synthetic compounds. Journal of Word-Formation, 1, 13–14.
Nagpal, J., & Nicoladis, E. (2009). Why are noun-verb-er compounds so difficult for English-speaking children? Mental Lexicon, 4, 276–301.
Olsen, S. (2017). Synthetic compounds from a lexicalist perspective. Journal of Word-Formation, 1, 17–45.
Pye, C., & Pfeiler, B. (2013). The comparative method of language acquisition research: A Mayan case study. Journal of Child Language, 41, 382–415.
Rainer, F. (2010). Carmens Erwerb der deutschen Wortbildung. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
Ralli, A. (2013). Compounding in modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ravid, D., & Avidor, A. (1998). Acquisition of derived nominals in Hebrew: Developmental and linguistic principles. Journal of Child Language, 25(2), 229–266.
Ravid, D., Dressler, W. U., Nir-Sagiv, B., Korecky-Kröll, K., Souman, A., Rehfeldt, K., Laaha, S., Bertl, J., Basbøll, H., & Gillis, S. (2008). Core morphology in child directed speech: Crosslinguistic corpus analyses of noun plurals. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Corpora in language acquisition research (pp. 25–60). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Savickienė, I., & Dressler, W. U. (Eds.) (2007). The acquisition of diminutives: a cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Schiff, R., & Katan, P. (2014). Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–10.
Simone, R., & Insacco, G. (2017). Cicli lessicali e polisemia nelle nominalizzazioni: Analisi di un corpus italiano [Lexical cycles and polysemy in nominalizations: Analysis of an italian corpus]. Studi e Saggi Linguistici, 55, 9–46.
Skalička, V. (1979). Typologische studien. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Stephany, U. (1980). Zur psychischen Realität der Dimension der Deskriptivität [On the psychological reality of descriptivity]. In G. Brettschneider & C. Lehmann (Eds.), Wege zur Universalienforschung: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 60. Geburtstag von Hansjakob Seiler [Perspectives of research in language universals: Linguistic contributions. on the occasion of the 60th birthday of Hansjakob Seiler (pp. 549–555). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Stephany, U., & Thomadaki, E. (2016). Compounds in early Greek first language acquisition—including an onomasiological approach to lexical typology of Greek and German. Arbeitspapier 60 (N.F.). Köln: Institut für Linguistik.
Stephany, U., & Voeikova, M. D. (Eds.) (2009). Development of nominal inflection in first language acquisition: A cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. D., & Noccetti, S. (Eds.) (2015). Semantics and morphology of early adjectives in first language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publ.
Van den Bos, E., & Poletiek, F. H. (2008). Effects of complexity on artificial grammar learning. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1122–1131.
Werner, M. (2017). Zur Entwicklung der synthetischen Komposition in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Journal of Word-Formation, 1, 73–92.
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmović, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D., & Dressler, W. U. (2011). On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language, 31, 461–479.
Xarčenko, V. K., & Ozerova, E. G. (1999). Složnye slova v detskoj reči [Compounds in child language]. Belgorod: Belgorod University Press.
Yang, C. (2016). The price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Zurek, W. H. (Ed.) (1990). Complexity, entropy and the physics of information. Redwood City: Addison–Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
S. Sommer-Lolei is recipient of a DOC-team fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dressler, W.U., Sommer-Lolei, S., Korecky-Kröll, K. et al. First-language acquisition of synthetic compounds in Estonian, Finnish, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian and Saami. Morphology 29, 409–429 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-019-09339-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-019-09339-0
Keywords
- Acquisition
- Building-block model
- Complexity
- Language typology
- Morphological richness
- Synthetic compounds