Abstract
Most psycholinguistic models of lexical processing assume that the comprehension and production of inflected forms is mediated by morphemic constituents. Several more recent studies, however, have challenged this assumption by providing empirical evidence that information about individual inflected forms and their paradigmatic relations is available in long-term memory (Baayen et al. 1997; Milin et al. 2009a, 2009b). Here, we investigate how whole-word frequency, inflectional paradigm size and morphological family size affect production latencies and articulation durations when subjects are asked to read aloud isolated Estonian case-inflected nouns. In Experiment 1, we observed that words with a larger morphological family elicited shorter speech onset latencies, and that forms with higher whole-word frequency had shorter acoustic durations. Experiment 2, for which we increased statistical power by using 2,800 words, revealed that higher whole-word frequency, inflectional paradigm size, and morphological family size reduced both speech onset times and acoustic durations. These results extend our knowledge of morphological processing in three ways. First, whole-word frequency effects of inflected forms in morphologically rich languages are not restricted to a small number of very high-frequency forms, contrary to previous claims (Niemi et al. 1994; Hankamer 1989; Yang 2016). Second, we replicated the morphological family size effect in a new domain, the acoustic durations of inflected forms. Third, we showed that a novel paradigmatic measure, inflectional paradigm size, predicts word naming latencies and acoustic durations. These results fit well with Word-and-Paradigm morphology (Blevins 2016) and argue against strictly (de)compositional models of lexical processing.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
http://www.cl.ut.ee/korpused/grammatikakorpus/ (15.04.2017).
jalgadel and jalul both express adessive plurals, but jalgadel has more external locational meaning (something is on the feet) and jalul more a idiosyncratic meaning as ‘back on the feet’.
Hence, some inflected forms were counted neither as a part of inflectional paradigm nor orthographic neighbourhood count.
References
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61.
Arnold, D., Tomaschek, F., Lopez, F., Sering, T., & Baayen, R. H. (2017). Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0174,623. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174623.
Arnon, I., & Cohen Priva, U. (2013). More than words: the effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56(3), 349–371.
Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(1), 67–82.
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychology Research, 3, 12–28.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 94–117.
Baayen, R. H., McQueen, J., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: revisiting Dutch plurals. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 355–390). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: a regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 419–463.
Baayen, R. H., Levelt, W., Schreuder, R., & Ernestus, M. (2008). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society, 43(1), 1–29.
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović-Ðurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438–481.
Baayen, R. H., Sering, T., Shaoul, C., & Milin, P. (2017a). Language comprehension as a multiple label classification problem. In Proceedings of the 32nd international workshop on statistical modelling (IWSM). The Netherlands: Johann Bernoulli Institute, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. 3–7 July, 2017.
Baayen, R. H., Vasishth, S., Bates, D., & Kliegl, R. (2017b). The cave of shadows: addressing the human factor with generalized additive mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 206–234.
Balling, L., & Baayen, R. H. (2008). Morphological effects in auditory word recognition: evidence from Danish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1159–1190.
Balling, L. W., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words. Cognition, 125(1), 80–106.
Balota, D., Cortese, M., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition for single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 283–316.
Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: the effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19, 241–248.
Bien, H., Levelt, W., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Frequency effects in compound production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 17,876–17,881.
Bien, H., Baayen, R. H., & Levelt, W. J. (2011). Frequency effects in the production of Dutch deverbal adjectives and inflected verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 683–715.
Blevins, J. P. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 79, 737–767.
Blevins, J. P. (2013). Word-based morphology from Aristotle to modern WP. In K. Allan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics (pp. 375–395). Oxford: Oxfort University Press.
Blevins, J. P. (2016). Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blevins, J. P., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M. (2017). The Zipfian paradigm cell filling problem. In J. Kiefer, J. P. Blevins, & H. Bartos (Eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses. Leiden: Brill. Chap. 8.
Caselli, N. K., Caselli, M. K., & Cohen-Goldberg, A. M. (2016). Inflected words in production: evidence for a morphologically rich lexicon. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 432–454.
Cotterell, R., Kirov, C., Sylak-Glassman, J., Walther, G., Vylomova, E., Xia, P., Faruqui, M., Kübler, S., Yarowsky, D., Eisner, J., & Mans, H. (2017). CoNLL-SIGMORPHON 2017 shared task: universal morphological reinflection in 52 languages. Preprint, arXiv:170609031.
De Jong, N. H. (2002). Morphological families in the mental lexicon. MPI series in psycholinguistics. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
De Jong, N. H., Feldman, L. B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81, 555–567.
Fasiolo, M., Goude, Y., Nedellec, R., & Wood, S. N. (2016). Fast calibrated additive quantile regression. R package version 1.0.
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion.
Fruchter, J., & Marantz, A. (2015). Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: meg evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 143, 81–96.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), Current studies in linguistics: Vol. 24. The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hanique, I., & Ernestus, M. (2012). The role of morphology in acoustic reduction. Lingue E Linguaggio, 11(2), 147–164.
Hankamer, J. (1989). Morphological parsing and the lexicon. In W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 392–408). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1990). Generalized additive models. New York: Wiley Online Library.
Hay, J. B. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative? Linguistics, 39, 1041–1070.
Hendrix, P. (2015). Experimental explorations of a discrimination learning approach to language processing. PhD thesis, University of Tübingen.
Hothorn, T., Buehlmann, P., Dudoit, S., Molinaro, A., & Van Der Laan, M. (2006). Survival ensembles. Biostatistics, 7, 355–373.
Janssen, N., & Barber, H. A. (2012). Phrase frequency effects in language production. PLoS ONE, 7(3), 202, e3
Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(7–8), 1191–1223.
Kaalep, H. J. (1997). An Estonian morphological analyser and the impact of a corpus on its development. Computers and the Humanities, 31(2), 115–133.
Karlsson, F. (1986). Frequency considerations in morphology. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 39(1–4), 19–28.
Karlsson, F., & Koskenniemi, K. (1985). A process model of morphology and lexicon. Folia Linguistica, 19(1–2), 207–232.
Keuleers, E. (2013). vwr: useful functions for visual word recognition research. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vwr, R package version 0.3.0.
Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: a lexical decision study on 14,000 Dutch mono- and disyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 174.
Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304.
Koskenniemi, K. (1984). A general computational model for word-form recognition and production. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on computational linguistics, association for computational linguistics (pp. 178–181).
Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2006). Morphological predictability and acoustic salience of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 122, 2018–2024.
Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading of multimorphemic Dutch compounds: towards a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876–895.
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., & Baayen, R. H. (2017, submitted for publication). Whole-word frequency and inflectional paradigm size facilitate Estonian case-inflected noun processing. Manuscript.
Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., & Hyönä, J. (1995). Morphological processing of polymorphemic nouns in a highly inflecting language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(5), 457–502.
Laine, M., Vainio, S., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(1), 109–135.
Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2003). How word frequency affects morphological processing in monolinguals and bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(03), 213–225.
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
Lin, X., & Zhang, D. (1999). Inference in generalized additive mixed models by using smoothing splines. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Statistical Methodology, 61(2), 381–400.
Marantz, A. (2013). No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(7), 905–916.
Marcus, G. F., Brinkman, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: the exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189–256.
Matthews, P. H. (1974). Morphology: an introduction to the theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milin, P., Filipović Durdević, D., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009a). The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 50–64.
Milin, P., Kuperman, V., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2009b). Paradigms bit by bit: an information-theoretic approach to the processing of paradigmatic structure in inflection and derivation. In J. P. Blevins & J. Blevins (Eds.), Analogy in grammar: form and acquisition (pp. 214–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Bertram, R., Häikiö, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: the case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1271–1278.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: an information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94, 1–18.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Changing places: a cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496–512.
Mulder, K., Dijkstra, T., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2014). Effects of primary and secondary morphological family size in monolingual and bilingual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 59–84.
Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423–446.
Pham, H. (2014). Visual processing of Vietnamese compound words: a multivariate analysis of using corpus linguistic and psycholinguistic paradigms. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Canada.
Pham, H., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Vietnamese compounds show an anti-frequency effect in visual lexical decision. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(9), 1077–1095.
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: the ingredients of language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Plag, I., Homann, J., & Kunter, G. (2017). Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics, 53(1), 181–216.
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.
Roelofs, A. (1996). Morpheme frequency in speech production: testing WEAVER. In G. E. Booij, & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 135–154). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schmidtke, D., Matsuki, K., & Kuperman, V. (2017). Surviving blind decomposition: a distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118–139.
Shaoul, C., Westbury, C. F., & Baayen, R. H. (2013). The subjective frequency of word n-grams. Psihologija, 46(4), 497–537.
Shaoul, C., Baayen, R. H., & Westbury, C. F. (2014). N-gram probability effects in a cloze task. The Mental Lexicon, 9(3), 437–472.
Soveri, A., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2007). Word frequency and morphological processing in Finnish revisited. The Mental Lexicon, 2(3), 359–385.
Sprenger, S., & van Rijn, H. (2013). It’s time to do the math: computation and retrieval in phrase production. The Mental Lexicon, 8(1), 1–25.
Stump, G. (2001). Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sun, C. C. (2016). Lexical processing in simplified Chinese: An investigation using a new large-scale lexical database. PhD thesis, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen.
Tabak, W., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Lexical statistics and lexical processing: semantic density, information complexity, sex, and irregularity in Dutch. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (Eds.), Linguistic Evidence—Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives (pp. 529–555). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Tabak, W., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Producing inflected verbs: a picture naming study. The Mental Lexicon, 5(1), 22–46.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745–765.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620.
Tomaschek, F., & Baayen, R. H. (2017, in preparation). The consequences of lexical proficiency for articulation. Manuscript.
Tomaschek, F., Wieling, M., Arnold, D., & Baayen, R. H. (2013). Word frequency, vowel length and vowel quality in speech production: an EMA study of the importance of experience. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 1302–1306).
Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., Wieling, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2014). Vowel articulation affected by word frequency. In Proceedings of 10th ISSP, Cologne (pp. 429–432).
Traficante, D., & Burani, C. (2003). Visual processing of Italian verbs and adjectives: the role of the inflectional family size. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 45–64). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Tremblay, A., & Tucker, B. V. (2011). The effects of n-gram probabilistic measures on the recognition and production of four-word sequences. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2), 302–324.
Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61(2), 569–613.
Vare, S. (2012). Eesti keele sõnapered. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Statistical Methodology, 73(1), 3–36.
Wood, S. N., Goude, Y., & Shaw, S. (2015). Generalized additive models for large data sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C. Applied Statistics, 64(1), 139–155.
Yang, C. (2010). Three factors in language variation. Lingua, 120(5), 1160–1177.
Yang, C. (2016). The price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Pärtel Lippus and Einar Meister for their assistance with the data collection as well as the editor-in-chief Olivier Bonami and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful reviews on the earlier version of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the national scholarship program Kristjan Jaak, funded and managed by Archimedes Foundation in collaboration with the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research and by an Alexander von Humboldt research award (grant number 1141527) to the first and last author, respectively.
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lõo, K., Järvikivi, J., Tomaschek, F. et al. Production of Estonian case-inflected nouns shows whole-word frequency and paradigmatic effects. Morphology 28, 71–97 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9318-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-017-9318-7