Skip to main content
Log in

Notes on exponents. A review of Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, 568 pp., ISBN 978-0-19-957373-8

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackema, P. (1995). Syntax below zero. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.

  • Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: a general theory of inflection and word formation. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, J. D. (2000). The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 35–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax. Doctoral dissertation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Carstairs, A. (1987). Allomorphy in inflection. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Besten, H. (1977). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Ms., University of Amsterdam [Published in 1983, in W. Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the West Germania (pp. 47–131). Amsterdam: Benjamins].

  • Embick, D. (2010). Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10, 210–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1975). Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language, 51, 639–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuryłowicz, J. (1949). La nature des procès dits analogiques. Acta Linguistica, 5, 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, A. (1993). Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar (pp. 113–150). Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J. (1968). Lexical insertion in a grammar without deep structure. In B. Darden, C. Bailey, & A. Davison (Eds.), CLS 4. Papers from the fourth meeting of the Chicago linguistic society (pp. 71–80). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mel’cuk, I. (1994). Suppletion: toward a logical analysis of the concept. Studies in Language, 18, 339–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. (1984). Zero derivation and inflection. In M. Speas & R. Sproat (Eds.), MIT working papers in linguistics (Vol. 7, pp. 53–69). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmeyer, F. (1992). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language, 68, 756–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In D. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing (pp. 216–271). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starke, M. (2009). Nanosyntax: a short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd, 36(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommer, J. (2008). A feature-geometric approach to Amharic verb classes. In A. Bachrach & A. Nevins (Eds.), Inflectional identity (pp. 206–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuggy, D. (2005). Cognitive approach to word-formation. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of word-formation (pp. 233–265). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, R. (1996). Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 27, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Fábregas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fábregas, A. Notes on exponents. A review of Jochen Trommer (ed.), The morphology and phonology of exponence. Morphology 24, 71–82 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9233-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-014-9233-0

Navigation